BACKGROUND: Although it is well recognized that recovery of pulmonary vein (PV) conduction is common among patients who fail atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, little is known about the precise time course of recurrence. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and time course of early recurrence of conduction after PV isolation during AF ablation. METHODS: The patient population was composed of 14 consecutive patients (9 men [64%]; age 56 +/- 7 years) with AF who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation via circumferential ablation with PV isolation, determined by a circular mapping catheter. After successful isolation of the PVs, repeat circular electrode recordings from each PV were obtained at 30 and 60 minutes. RESULTS: After complete isolation of all PVs, early PV recurrence was observed in 13 (93%) patients and 26 veins (50%). Seventeen veins (33%) showed a first recurrence at 30 minutes, while nine veins (17%) showed a first recurrence at 60 minutes. CONCLUSION: The results reveal an extremely high rate of early recurrence of PV conduction following AF ablation. It is particularly notable that about one-fifth of the veins remained isolated at 30 minutes, but subsequently developed recurrence between 30 and 60 minutes. Of the veins that showed early recurrence, one-third developed a first recurrence at 60 minutes. These findings suggest that AF ablation procedures should incorporate a 60-minute waiting period after initial isolation in order to detect early recurrence of conduction.
BACKGROUND: Although it is well recognized that recovery of pulmonary vein (PV) conduction is common among patients who fail atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, little is known about the precise time course of recurrence. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and time course of early recurrence of conduction after PV isolation during AF ablation. METHODS: The patient population was composed of 14 consecutive patients (9 men [64%]; age 56 +/- 7 years) with AF who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation via circumferential ablation with PV isolation, determined by a circular mapping catheter. After successful isolation of the PVs, repeat circular electrode recordings from each PV were obtained at 30 and 60 minutes. RESULTS: After complete isolation of all PVs, early PV recurrence was observed in 13 (93%) patients and 26 veins (50%). Seventeen veins (33%) showed a first recurrence at 30 minutes, while nine veins (17%) showed a first recurrence at 60 minutes. CONCLUSION: The results reveal an extremely high rate of early recurrence of PV conduction following AF ablation. It is particularly notable that about one-fifth of the veins remained isolated at 30 minutes, but subsequently developed recurrence between 30 and 60 minutes. Of the veins that showed early recurrence, one-third developed a first recurrence at 60 minutes. These findings suggest that AF ablation procedures should incorporate a 60-minute waiting period after initial isolation in order to detect early recurrence of conduction.
Authors: Ravi Ranjan; Ritsushi Kato; Menekhem M Zviman; Timm M Dickfeld; Ariel Roguin; Ronald D Berger; Gordon F Tomaselli; Henry R Halperin Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2011-04-14
Authors: Ehud J Schmidt; Maggie M Fung; Pelin Aksit Ciris; Ting Song; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; Godtfred Holmvang; Sandeep N Gupta; Miguel Chaput; Robert A Levine; Jeremy Ruskin; Vivek Y Reddy; Andre D'avila; Anthony H Aletras; Stephan B Danik Journal: Europace Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; José Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Ehud J Schmidt; Zion T H Tse; Tobias R Reichlin; Gregory F Michaud; Ronald D Watkins; Kim Butts-Pauly; Raymond Y Kwong; William Stevenson; Jeffrey Schweitzer; Israel Byrd; Charles L Dumoulin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ravi Ranjan; Eugene G Kholmovski; Joshua Blauer; Sathya Vijayakumar; Nelly A Volland; Mohamed E Salama; Dennis L Parker; Rob MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2012-10-15