Literature DB >> 24481528

One-step generation of knockout pigs by zygote injection of CRISPR/Cas system.

Tang Hai1, Fei Teng2, Runfa Guo1, Wei Li1, Qi Zhou1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481528      PMCID: PMC3945887          DOI: 10.1038/cr.2014.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Res        ISSN: 1001-0602            Impact factor:   25.617


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor,

The pig is an important livestock for food supply and an ideal model for various human diseases. Efficient and precise genetic engineering in pigs holds great promise in agriculture and biomedicine[1]. Using currently available approach, generating specific gene modifications in pigs requires two steps. First, site-specific nucleases such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) are used to generate targeted mutations in pig somatic cells. Then the engineered somatic nucleus is used to generate cloned animals using somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) technology[2,3]. The complex design and generation of ZFNs and TALENs, as well as the technical challenges of SCNT, greatly limit the application of this method. Recently a new type of site-specific nuclease was identified in CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) RNA-based adaptive immune system in bacteria and archaea[4]. The Cas9 endonuclease from Streptococcus pyogenes type II CRISPR/Cas system can be engineered to produce targeted genome modification under the guidance of a synthetic single guide RNA (sgRNA) with simple base-pair complementarities with a target genomic DNA sequence[5,6,7]. Although highly efficient one-step generation of mice and rats carrying single or multiple mutations have been achieved through direct injection of CRISPR/Cas system into one-cell embryo[8,9], it remains to be tested whether the same strategy could be applied to generation of genome-engineered large animals. Here we report the efficient generation of biallelic knockout pigs in one step by direct cytoplasmic injection of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA into zygotes. To demonstrate the application of genome engineering in disease modeling and agriculture, we chose to target vWF gene, whose deficiency in human causes severe von Willebrand disease (vWD)[10] (Supplementary information, Figure S1). As mouse model does not fully recapitulate the disease phenotype and response to treatment in human patients, a large animal model with similar size of organ and circulatory system is highly desirable. In food industry, bleeding is an important procedure before meat production, as the leftover blood is an ideal medium for bacterial growth. vWF knockout could improve bleeding efficiency for slaughtering procedures and blood collection. We designed an sgRNA targeting exon 5 of the pig vWF gene, which lies in the first trysin-inhibitor-like domain and its mutation could lead to the loss of function of vWF protein. The in vitro developmental efficiencies of embryos injected with Cas9 mRNA/sgRNA (∼79%) and embryos injected with water (∼77%) were both very high and comparable with each other, suggesting that the microinjection manipulation and the Cas9 mRNA/sgRNA had little effect on pig early embryonic development (Supplementary information, Table S1). We next transferred the injected embryos into surrogate pigs to produce piglets. A total of 76 injected embryos were transplanted into 5 surrogate mothers in 5 independent experiments. Three surrogates were successfully pregnant and delivered a total of 16 piglets (Figure 1A). T7 endonuclease I (T7EI) assay showed that 10 piglets contained insertions or deletions (indels) in the targeting site, indicating that vWF mutation efficiency reached about 63% (10/16) (Figure 1A and 1B). We further analyzed the genotype by Sanger sequencing of the PCR products containing the targeting site of each individual piglet. The sequencing results confirmed the indels and revealed that one mutant pig yielding uncut PCR product in the T7EI assay (fourth lane in Figure 1B) contained only one type of mutant allele. Most pigs contained more than two different alleles (Figure 1C, pig #4 and #11), suggesting that the Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage may occur at embryonic stage later than the one-cell stage, as previously observed with ZFN, TALEN and CRISPR-mediated targeting[11]. In each pig, if no wild-type allele was detected by sequencing, we categorized the pig as biallelic mutant. If both wild-type and mutant alleles were observed in the sequence reads, we categorized the pig as monoallelic mutant, although the ratio of wild-type to mutant alleles might not always be 1. In total, we identified six vWF biallelic mutant piglets and five monoallelic mutant piglets (11/16, 68%) (Figure 1A and 1C). Of these piglets, two died shortly after birth and the other 14 survived until now (Figure 1D). The high birth rate (16/76, 21%) and survival rate (14/16, 88%) indicated that Cas9 mRNA/sgRNA had little toxicity to pig embryonic development (Figure 1A). These results demonstrate that the CRISPR/Cas system could efficiently generate both monoallelic and biallelic mutant pigs in one step through direct zygote injection.
Figure 1

Generation of vWF-knockout pigs using the CRISPR/Cas system and phenotypic analyses. (A) Summary of generated vWF mutant pigs via zygote injection of Cas9 mRNA/sgRNA. Two piglets #7 and #8 died soon after birth. Biallelic mutant pigs are #3, #4, #7, #9, #10 and #11. (B) T7 Endonuclease I (T7EI) assay of the pigs produced by zygote injection of Cas9 mRNA/sgRNA from experiment 3. The PCR product encompassing the vWF targeting site of each pig is shown in the upper panel. The denatured and re-annealed PCR product was then digested using T7EI, and the result is shown in the lower panel. The red * indicates the pigs with mutations, the ** indicates the wild-type pig, and the fourth lane shows one biallelic mutant pig that cannot be cut but contains only one type of mutant allele as examined by Sanger sequencing. (C) Sanger sequencing of the targeting site in mutant pigs. The PAM sequence is bold and labeled in red. On the right side of each allele, the sizes of insertions (+) or deletions (Δ) are indicated. (D) Piglets carrying vWF mutation. The red arrowheads mark the biallelic mutant piglets. (E) Western blot detection of vWF expression of monoallelic mutant (Mono), biallelic mutant (Bi) and wild-type (WT) pigs. (F) Plasma vWF antigen levels of Mono, Bi and WT pigs. **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. (G) FVIII activity of Mono, Bi and WT pigs. *P < 0.05. (H) Bleeding time of Mono, Bi and WT pigs. ***P < 0.001. Five wild-type pigs, three monoallelic mutant pigs and five biallelic mutant pigs are included in the assays shown in F-H. The P values are calculated using Student's t-test. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

We further examined whether the vWF mutations cause the vWD phenotypes. Western blot analysis showed that the vWF expression in lung was largely reduced in monoallelic mutant pigs, and was undetectable in biallelic mutant pigs, confirming the vWF knockout at protein levels (Figure 1E). We next performed hematological analysis with pigs having different genotypes. The plasma vWF antigen level was significantly reduced in the monoallelic mutant pig group, and was nearly undetectable in biallelic mutant group (Figure 1F). In human vWD, the level of coagulation factor FVIII may be reduced due to rapid degradation in the absence of vWF[10]. Consistently, the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-based assay for FVIII activity showed a significantly lower activity in the biallelic mutant group, indicating that FVIII level was decreased in the plasma of vWF-null pigs (Figure 1G). No significant differences were observed between wild-type and knockout pigs with regard to other parameters in the hematological analysis (Supplementary information, Table S2). The most prominent phenotype resulting from vWF mutation is a severe bleeding tendency[10]. We found that the bleeding time of biallelic mutant pigs (512 ± 121 min) was much longer than that of wild-type pigs (34 ± 11 min) (Figure 1H). Taken together, our results demonstrate that the one-step generated biallelic mutant pigs developed similar phenotypes of the human vWD. A certain level of off-target cleavage by CRISPR/Cas system was suggested by recent studies in human cell lines[12], indicating that Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage tolerates small numbers of mismatches between sgRNA and target DNA especially in protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)-distal region[12]. We thus sought to test the possible off-target effects in genome-modified pigs derived from zygote injection. By screening the genome based on sequence homology (> 14 base pair identity to 3′ end of the sgRNA spacer), around 20 potential off-target sites were found (Supplementary information, Figure S2). In all 11 mutant animals tested, none of them contained indels at 2 randomly chosen sites based on T7EI assay (Supplementary information, Figure S2). We further analyzed the potential off-target effects by Sanger sequencing of 10 randomly selected potential off-target sites in 3 biallelic mutant pigs (#9, #10 and #11). None of the sequencing reads had mutations, suggesting no off-target effects at these sites (Supplementary information, Figure S2). However, we could not exclude the possible existence of certain off-target effects due to the high number of potential off-target sites. Thus a systematic off-target evaluation would be needed in the future before the wide application of such knockout pig models. Also, modified CRISPR/Cas-methods with less off-target tendency can be used for genome engineering in pigs and other large animals[13]. Germline transmission of the mutations to next generation is essential for expanding the knockout pig population. To examine the germline transmission potential of the mutations, we dissected an ovary from a monoallelic mutant female pig and a testis from a biallelic mutant male pig by biopsy and analyzed their genotypes by Sanger sequencing. Both the ovary and the testis were morphologically normal (Supplementary information, Figure S3). More than half sequence reads of the ovary and all the sequence reads of the testis were mutant, indicating that the mutations had been efficiently transmitted into the germline (Supplementary information, Figure S3). Considering the highly efficient germline transmission in rodents using the same procedure[14], germline transmission of the mutations to next generation is highly expected. In summary, we have shown that zygote injection of the CRISPR/Cas system can efficiently generate genome-modified pigs in one step, resulting in rapid establishment of large animal model for important human diseases. The high efficiency of Cas9-mediated genome editing in pigs demonstrated here, together with the versatile functionality of the CRISPR/Cas system such as multiplexed genome editing and epigenetic modification[5], opens up unlimited possibilities of genome engineering in livestock for applications in agriculture and biomedicine.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Transgenic swine for biomedicine and agriculture.

Authors:  R S Prather; R J Hawley; D B Carter; L Lai; J L Greenstein
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Blake Wiedenheft; Samuel H Sternberg; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Simultaneous generation and germline transmission of multiple gene mutations in rat using CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors:  Wei Li; Fei Teng; Tianda Li; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Efficient generation of a biallelic knockout in pigs using zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Janet Hauschild; Bjoern Petersen; Yolanda Santiago; Anna-Lisa Queisser; Joseph W Carnwath; Andrea Lucas-Hahn; Lei Zhang; Xiangdong Meng; Philip D Gregory; Reinhard Schwinzer; Gregory J Cost; Heiner Niemann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Efficient TALEN-mediated gene knockout in livestock.

Authors:  Daniel F Carlson; Wenfang Tan; Simon G Lillico; Dana Stverakova; Chris Proudfoot; Michelle Christian; Daniel F Voytas; Charles R Long; C Bruce A Whitelaw; Scott C Fahrenkrug
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; Kevin M Esvelt; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Knockout rats via embryo microinjection of zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Aron M Geurts; Gregory J Cost; Yevgeniy Freyvert; Bryan Zeitler; Jeffrey C Miller; Vivian M Choi; Shirin S Jenkins; Adam Wood; Xiaoxia Cui; Xiangdong Meng; Anna Vincent; Stephen Lam; Mieczyslaw Michalkiewicz; Rebecca Schilling; Jamie Foeckler; Shawn Kalloway; Hartmut Weiler; Séverine Ménoret; Ignacio Anegon; Gregory D Davis; Lei Zhang; Edward J Rebar; Philip D Gregory; Fyodor D Urnov; Howard J Jacob; Roland Buelow
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9.

Authors:  Prashant Mali; Luhan Yang; Kevin M Esvelt; John Aach; Marc Guell; James E DiCarlo; Julie E Norville; George M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  von Willebrand factor and von Willebrand disease.

Authors:  Z M Ruggeri; T S Zimmerman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering.

Authors:  Haoyi Wang; Hui Yang; Chikdu S Shivalila; Meelad M Dawlaty; Albert W Cheng; Feng Zhang; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  193 in total

1.  Pigs pave a way to de novo formation of functional human kidneys.

Authors:  Elisabeth Kemter; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Interspecies chimeric complementation for the generation of functional human tissues and organs in large animal hosts.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  Genome editing revolutionize the creation of genetically modified pigs for modeling human diseases.

Authors:  Jing Yao; Jiaojiao Huang; Jianguo Zhao
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Tracking and transforming neocortical progenitors by CRISPR/Cas9 gene targeting and piggyBac transposase lineage labeling.

Authors:  Fuyi Chen; Joel Rosiene; Alicia Che; Albert Becker; Joseph LoTurco
Journal:  Development       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 5.  A CRISPR Path to Engineering New Genetic Mouse Models for Cardiovascular Research.

Authors:  Joseph M Miano; Qiuyu Martin Zhu; Charles J Lowenstein
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 6.  Genome Editing with mRNA Encoding ZFN, TALEN, and Cas9.

Authors:  Hong-Xia Zhang; Ying Zhang; Hao Yin
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 7.  Genome editing and genetic engineering in livestock for advancing agricultural and biomedical applications.

Authors:  Bhanu P Telugu; Ki-Eun Park; Chi-Hun Park
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Mosaicism diminishes the value of pre-implantation embryo biopsies for detecting CRISPR/Cas9 induced mutations in sheep.

Authors:  Marcela Vilarino; Fabian Patrik Suchy; Sheikh Tamir Rashid; Helen Lindsay; Juan Reyes; Bret Roberts McNabb; Talitha van der Meulen; Mark O Huising; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Pablo Juan Ross
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 9.  Exogenous enzymes upgrade transgenesis and genetic engineering of farm animals.

Authors:  Pablo Bosch; Diego O Forcato; Fabrisio E Alustiza; Ana P Alessio; Alejandro E Fili; María F Olmos Nicotra; Ana C Liaudat; Nancy Rodríguez; Thirumala R Talluri; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  TALEN-mediated gene targeting in porcine spermatogonia.

Authors:  Lin Tang; Alla Bondareva; Raquel González; Jose R Rodriguez-Sosa; Daniel F Carlson; Dennis Webster; Scott Fahrenkrug; Ina Dobrinski
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.