Literature DB >> 28712062

Genome editing and genetic engineering in livestock for advancing agricultural and biomedical applications.

Bhanu P Telugu1,2,3, Ki-Eun Park4,5,6, Chi-Hun Park4,5.   

Abstract

Genetic modification of livestock has a longstanding and successful history, starting with domestication several thousand years ago. Modern animal breeding strategies predominantly based on marker-assisted and genomic selection, artificial insemination, and embryo transfer have led to significant improvement in the performance of domestic animals, and are the basis for regular supply of high quality animal derived food. However, the current strategy of breeding animals over multiple generations to introduce novel traits is not realistic in responding to the unprecedented challenges such as changing climate, pandemic diseases, and feeding an anticipated 3 billion increase in global population in the next three decades. Consequently, sophisticated genetic modifications that allow for seamless introgression of novel alleles or traits and introduction of precise modifications without affecting the overall genetic merit of the animal are required for addressing these pressing challenges. The requirement for precise modifications is especially important in the context of modeling human diseases for the development of therapeutic interventions. The animal science community envisions the genome editors as essential tools in addressing these critical priorities in agriculture and biomedicine, and for advancing livestock genetic engineering for agriculture, biomedical as well as "dual purpose" applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28712062     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-017-9709-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  117 in total

1.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer and transgenesis in large animals: current and future insights.

Authors:  C Galli; I Lagutina; A Perota; S Colleoni; R Duchi; F Lucchini; G Lazzari
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.005

2.  Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells.

Authors:  I Wilmut; A E Schnieke; J McWhir; A J Kind; K H Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Psychosocial risk factors for hypertension: an update of the literature.

Authors:  Yendelela Cuffee; Chinwe Ogedegbe; Natasha J Williams; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Antoinette Schoenthaler
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection.

Authors:  R E Hammer; V G Pursel; C E Rexroad; R J Wall; D J Bolt; K M Ebert; R D Palmiter; R L Brinster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jun 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Generation of RUNX3 knockout pigs using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting.

Authors:  J-T Kang; J Ryu; B Cho; E-J Lee; Y-J Yun; S Ahn; J Lee; D-Y Ji; K Lee; K-W Park
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.005

6.  Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype.

Authors:  D W Threadgill; A A Dlugosz; L A Hansen; T Tennenbaum; U Lichti; D Yee; C LaMantia; T Mourton; K Herrup; R C Harris
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Diet-induced obesity in two C57BL/6 substrains with intact or mutant nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (Nnt) gene.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholson; Peter C Reifsnyder; Rachel D Malcolm; Charlotte A Lucas; Grant R MacGregor; Weidong Zhang; Edward H Leiter
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Growth and tissue accretion rates of swine expressing an insulin-like growth factor I transgene.

Authors:  V G Pursel; A D Mitchell; G Bee; T H Elsasser; J P McMurtry; R J Wall; M E Coleman; R J Schwartz
Journal:  Anim Biotechnol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.282

9.  Somatic expression of herpes thymidine kinase in mice following injection of a fusion gene into eggs.

Authors:  R L Brinster; H Y Chen; M Trumbauer; A W Senear; R Warren; R D Palmiter
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  What have we learned from mouse models for cystic fibrosis?

Authors:  Isabel Carvalho-Oliveira; Bob J Scholte; Deborah Penque
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.225

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Improvements in pig agriculture through gene editing.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Jonathan A Green; Bethany K Redel; Rodney D Geisert; Kiho Lee; Bhanu P Telugu; Kevin D Wells; Randall S Prather
Journal:  CABI Agric Biosci       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 2.  Conserved features of non-primate bilaminar disc embryos and the germline.

Authors:  Ramiro Alberio; Toshihiro Kobayashi; M Azim Surani
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 7.294

Review 3.  Unintended consequences of selection for increased production on the health and welfare of livestock.

Authors:  Este van Marle-Köster; Carina Visser
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2021-05-25

4.  Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior.

Authors:  Daniel Martin-Collado; Tim J Byrne; Jonh J Crowley; Tom Kirk; Guillermo Ripoll; C B A Whitelaw
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 5.  Application of Gene Editing Technology in Resistance Breeding of Livestock.

Authors:  Sutian Wang; Zixiao Qu; Qiuyan Huang; Jianfeng Zhang; Sen Lin; Yecheng Yang; Fanming Meng; Jianhao Li; Kunli Zhang
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.