Literature DB >> 25537467

Retention of proprioceptive recalibration following visuomotor adaptation.

Nilufer Nourouzpour1, Danielle Salomonczyk, Erin K Cressman, Denise Y P Henriques.   

Abstract

We have recently shown that visuomotor adaptation following reaches with a misaligned cursor not only induces changes in an individual's motor output, but their proprioceptive sense of hand position as well. Long-term changes are seen in motor adaptation; however, very little is known about the retention of changes in felt hand position. We sought to evaluate whether this recalibration in proprioception, following visuomotor adaptation, is sufficiently robust to be retained the following day (~24 h later), and if so, to determine its extent. Visuomotor adaptation was induced by having subjects perform reaches to visual targets using a cursor representing their unseen hand, which had been gradually rotated 45° counterclockwise. Motor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration were determined by assessing subjects' reach aftereffects and changes in hand bias, respectively. We found that subjects adapted their reaches and recalibrated their sense of hand position following training with a misaligned cursor, as shown in Cressman and Henriques (J Neurophysiol 102:3505-3518, 2009). More importantly, subjects who showed proprioceptive recalibration in the direction of motor adaptation on Day 1 did retain changes in felt hand position and motor adaptation on Day 2. These findings suggest that in addition to motor changes, individuals are capable of retaining sensory changes in proprioception up to 24 h later.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25537467     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4176-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  O Bock; S Schneider; J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration in older adults.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Danielle Salomonczyk; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Two waves of a long-lasting aftereffect of prism adaptation measured over 7 days.

Authors:  Y Hatada; R C Miall; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Internalizing agency of self-action: perception of one's own hand movements depends on an adaptable prediction about the sensory action outcome.

Authors:  Matthis Synofzik; Peter Thier; Axel Lindner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  9 in total

1.  Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Srikantan Nagarajan; James M McQueen; John Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Proprioceptive recalibration arises slowly compared to reach adaptation.

Authors:  Basel Zbib; Denise Y P Henriques; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Movements following force-field adaptation are aligned with altered sense of limb position.

Authors:  Hiroki Ohashi; Ruy Valle-Mena; Paul L Gribble; David J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Sensory Plasticity in Human Motor Learning.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Time Course of Reach Adaptation and Proprioceptive Recalibration during Visuomotor Learning.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ruttle; Erin K Cressman; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Motor learning without moving: Proprioceptive and predictive hand localization after passive visuoproprioceptive discrepancy training.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mostafa; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Intermanual transfer and retention of visuomotor adaptation to a large visuomotor distortion are driven by explicit processes.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Bouchard; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Separating Predicted and Perceived Sensory Consequences of Motor Learning.

Authors:  Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ruttle; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.