Literature DB >> 25972587

Generalization patterns for reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration differ after visuomotor learning.

Erin K Cressman1, Denise Y P Henriques2.   

Abstract

Visuomotor learning results in changes in both motor and sensory systems (Cressman EK, Henriques DY. J Neurophysiol 102: 3505-3518, 2009), such that reaches are adapted and sense of felt hand position recalibrated after reaching with altered visual feedback of the hand. Moreover, visuomotor learning has been shown to generalize such that reach adaptation achieved at a trained target location can influence reaches to novel target directions (Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. J Neurosci 20: 8916-8924, 2000). We looked to determine whether proprioceptive recalibration also generalizes to novel locations. Moreover, we looked to establish the relationship between reach adaptation and changes in sense of felt hand position by determining whether proprioceptive recalibration generalizes to novel targets in a similar manner as reach adaptation. On training trials, subjects reached to a single target with aligned or misaligned cursor-hand feedback, in which the cursor was either rotated or scaled in extent relative to hand movement. After reach training, subjects reached to the training target and novel targets (including targets from a second start position) without visual feedback to assess generalization of reach adaptation. Subjects then performed a proprioceptive estimation task, in which they indicated the position of their hand relative to visual reference markers placed at similar locations as the trained and novel reach targets. Results indicated that shifts in hand position generalized across novel locations, independent of reach adaptation. Thus these distinct sensory and motor generalization patterns suggest that reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration arise from independent error signals and that changes in one system cannot guide adjustments in the other.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  altered visual feedback; generalization; proprioception; reach adaptation; recalibration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25972587      PMCID: PMC4507963          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00415.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  47 in total

1.  Adaptation to displaced vision: visual, motor, or proprioceptive change?

Authors:  C S HARRIS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Evidence for an eye-centered spherical representation of the visuomotor map.

Authors:  P Vetter; S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method.

Authors:  Gordon M Redding; Yves Rossetti; Benjamin Wallace
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Internalizing agency of self-action: perception of one's own hand movements depends on an adaptable prediction about the sensory action outcome.

Authors:  Matthis Synofzik; Peter Thier; Axel Lindner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Sensory recalibration of hand position following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert; M I Jordan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching.

Authors:  D M Clower; J M Hoffman; J R Votaw; T L Faber; R P Woods; G E Alexander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements.

Authors:  Z M Pine; J W Krakauer; J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; A K Rao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Generalization of reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration at different distances in the workspace.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mostafa; Rozbeh Kamran-Disfani; Golsa Bahari-Kashani; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Movement and perception recalibrate differently across multiple days of locomotor learning.

Authors:  Kristan A Leech; Kevin A Day; Ryan T Roemmich; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Making Sense of Cerebellar Contributions to Perceptual and Motor Adaptation.

Authors:  Matthew A Statton; Alejandro Vazquez; Susanne M Morton; Erin V L Vasudevan; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.648

4.  Increase in weighting of vision vs. proprioception associated with force field adaptation.

Authors:  Brandon M Sexton; Yang Liu; Hannah J Block
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The effects of awareness of the perturbation during motor adaptation on hand localization.

Authors:  Shanaathanan Modchalingam; Chad Michael Vachon; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A robot-aided visuo-motor training that improves proprioception and spatial accuracy of untrained movement.

Authors:  Naveen Elangovan; Leonardo Cappello; Lorenzo Masia; Joshua Aman; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Split-Belt walking induces changes in active, but not passive, perception of step length.

Authors:  Carly Sombric; Marcela Gonzalez-Rubio; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  External error attribution dampens efferent-based predictions but not proprioceptive changes in hand localization.

Authors:  Raphael Q Gastrock; Shanaathanan Modchalingam; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.