Literature DB >> 21741546

Motor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration.

Erin K Cressman1, Denise Y P Henriques.   

Abstract

Goal-directed reaches are rapidly adapted after reaching with misaligned visual feedback of the hand. It has been suggested that reaching with misaligned visual feedback of the hand also results in proprioceptive recalibration (i.e., realigning proprioceptive estimates of hand position to match visual estimates). In this chapter, we review a series of experiments conducted in our lab which examine this proposal. We assessed proprioceptive recalibration by comparing subjects' estimates of the position at which they felt their hand was aligned with a reference marker (visual or proprioceptive) before and after aiming with a misaligned cursor that was typically rotated 30° clockwise (CW) with respect to the hand. In general, results indicated that subjects recalibrated proprioception such that their estimates of felt hand position were shifted in the same direction that they adapted their reaches. Moreover, proprioception was recalibrated to a similar extent of motor adaptation (∼30%), regardless of how the hand was positioned during the estimate trials (active or passive placement), the location or modality of the reference marker (visual or proprioceptive), the hand used during reach training (right or left), how the distortion was introduced (gradual or abrupt), and age (young or older subjects) and the magnitude of the visuomotor distortion introduced (30° or 50° or 70°). These results suggest that in addition to recalibrating the sensorimotor transformations underlying reaching movements, visuomotor adaptation results in partial proprioceptive recalibration.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741546     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53752-2.00011-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  15 in total

1.  Split-belt walking: adaptation differences between young and older adults.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Bruijn; Annouchka Van Impe; Jacques Duysens; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Trial-by-trial analysis of intermanual transfer during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Greg J Wojaczynski; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Generalization patterns for reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration differ after visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Intermanual transfer and proprioceptive recalibration following training with translated visual feedback of the hand.

Authors:  Ahmed A Mostafa; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Influence of movement kinematics on visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Anja Simon; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Humans use predictive kinematic models to calibrate visual cues to three-dimensional surface slant.

Authors:  Peter Scarfe; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Brain representations for acquiring and recalling visual-motor adaptations.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Jerome N Sanes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Sinusoidal error perturbation reveals multiple coordinate systems for sensorymotor adaptation.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Sensorimotor recalibration depends on attribution of sensory prediction errors to internal causes.

Authors:  Carlo Wilke; Matthis Synofzik; Axel Lindner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand.

Authors:  Victoria Barkley; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.