Literature DB >> 26424581

Intermanual transfer characteristics of dynamic learning: direction, coordinate frame, and consolidation of interlimb generalization.

Christian Stockinger1, Benjamin Thürer2, Anne Focke2, Thorsten Stein2.   

Abstract

Intermanual transfer, i.e., generalization of motor learning across hands, is a well-accepted phenomenon of motor learning. Yet, there are open questions regarding the characteristics of this transfer, particularly the intermanual transfer of dynamic learning. In this study, we investigated intermanual transfer in a force field adaptation task concerning the direction and the coordinate frame of transfer as well as the influence of a 24-h consolidation period on the transfer. We tested 48 healthy human subjects for transfer from dominant to nondominant hand, and vice versa. We considered two features of transfer. First, we examined transfer to the untrained hand using force channel trials that suppress error feedback and learning mechanisms to assess intermanual transfer in the form of a practice-dependent bias. Second, we considered transfer by exposing the subjects to the force field with the untrained hand to check for faster learning of the dynamics (interlimb savings). Half of the subjects were tested for transfer immediately after adaptation, whereas the other half were tested after a 24-h consolidation period. Our results showed intermanual transfer both from dominant to nondominant hand and vice versa in extrinsic coordinates. After the consolidation period, transfer effects were weakened. Moreover, the transfer effects were negligible compared with the subjects' ability to rapidly adapt to the force field condition. We conclude that intermanual transfer is a bidirectional phenomenon that vanishes with time. However, the ability to transfer motor learning seems to play a minor role compared with the rapid adaptation processes.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  force field adaptation; interlimb transfer; motor learning; motor memory; reaching movements

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26424581      PMCID: PMC4686290          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00727.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural averaging in motor learning.

Authors:  Andrew A G Mattar; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Intermittent practice facilitates stable motor memories.

Authors:  Simon A Overduin; Andrew G Richardson; Courtney E Lane; Emilio Bizzi; Daniel Z Press
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Trial-by-trial analysis of intermanual transfer during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Greg J Wojaczynski; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  About sleep's role in memory.

Authors:  Björn Rasch; Jan Born
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Catch trials in force field learning influence adaptation and consolidation of human motor memory.

Authors:  Christian Stockinger; Anne Focke; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Evidence of multiple coordinate representations during generalization of motor learning.

Authors:  Pritesh N Parmar; Felix C Huang; James L Patton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Distinct neural circuits for control of movement vs. holding still.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Lateralized motor control processes determine asymmetry of interlimb transfer.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer; Vivek Yadav
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Feedforward compensation for novel dynamics depends on force field orientation but is similar for the left and right arms.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Reuter; Ross Cunnington; Jason B Mattingley; Stephan Riek; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Samuel D McDougle; Mathias Hegele; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Unstable Memories Create a High-Level Representation that Enables Learning Transfer.

Authors:  Neechi Mosha; Edwin M Robertson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Simulated practice effects on the transfer and retention of gait sequences from the upper to the lower extremity.

Authors:  Mohammad R Saeedpour-Parizi; Surabhi Shripad Date; Luis Dominguez; Tayebeh Baniasadi; John B Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Random Practice Enhances Retention and Spatial Transfer in Force Field Adaptation.

Authors:  Michael Herzog; Anne Focke; Philipp Maurus; Benjamin Thürer; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  Mechanisms within the Parietal Cortex Correlate with the Benefits of Random Practice in Motor Adaptation.

Authors:  Benjamin Thürer; Christian Stockinger; Felix Putze; Tanja Schultz; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Consecutive learning of opposing unimanual motor tasks using the right arm followed by the left arm causes intermanual interference.

Authors:  Christian Stockinger; Benjamin Thürer; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Memory instability as a gateway to generalization.

Authors:  Edwin M Robertson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.