Literature DB >> 24467711

Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Ayman El Nakeeb1, Emad Hamdy, Ahmad M Sultan, Tarek Salah, Waleed Askr, Helmy Ezzat, Mohamed Said, Mostaffa Abu Zeied, Tallat Abdallah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The optimal strategy for the reconstruction of the pancreas following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy (IRPJ) with those of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) after PD.
METHODS: Consecutive patients submitted to PD were randomized to either method of reconstruction. The primary outcome measure was the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Secondary outcomes included operative time, day to resumption of oral feeding, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions.
RESULTS: Ninety patients treated by PD were included in the study. The median total operative time was significantly longer in the IRPJ group (320 min versus 300 min; P = 0.047). Postoperative pancreatic fistula developed in nine of 45 patients in the IRPJ group and 10 of 45 patients in the PG group (P = 0.796). Seven IRPJ patients and four PG patients had POPF of type B or C (P = 0.710). Time to resumption of oral feeding was shorter in the IRPJ group (P = 0.03). Steatorrhea at 1 year was reported in nine of 42 IRPJ patients and 18 of 41 PG patients (P = 0.029). Albumin levels at 1 year were 3.6 g/dl in the IRPJ group and 3.3 g/dl in the PG group (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Isolated Roux loop PJ was not associated with a lower rate of POPF, but was associated with a decrease in the incidence of postoperative steatorrhea. The technique allowed for early oral feeding and the maintenance of oral feeding even if POPF developed.
© 2014 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24467711      PMCID: PMC4113253          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  47 in total

1.  Risk-adapted anastomosis for partial pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces the risk of pancreatic fistula: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marco Niedergethmann; Niloufar Dusch; Rizky Widyaningsih; Christel Weiss; Peter Kienle; Stefan Post
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [Pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis with invagination on isolated loop after cephalic pancreatoduodenectomy].

Authors:  C Meyer; S Rohr; N De Manzini; C L Thiry; O Firtion
Journal:  Ann Ital Chir       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.766

4.  A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Duffas; Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Gilles Fourtanier; Fabrice Muscari; Jean Marie Hay; Abe Fingerhut; Bertrand Millat; Alexandre Radovanowic; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Isolated Roux Loop duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy avoids pancreatic leaks in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Abdaal W Khan; Anil K Agarwal; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 7.  The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis.

Authors:  Axel Kleespies; Markus Albertsmeier; Firas Obeidat; Hendrik Seeliger; Karl-Walter Jauch; Christiane J Bruns
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with reconstruction by Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy: no operative mortality in a series of 25 cases.

Authors:  D A Albertson
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Isolated Roux-loop pancreaticojejunostomy: a series of 61 patients with zero postoperative pancreaticoenteric leaks.

Authors:  Christopher D Sutton; Giuseppe Garcea; Stephen A White; Emily O'Leary; Leslie-Jane Marshall; David P Berry; Ashley R Dennison
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Alternative reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michael G Wayne; Irving A Jorge; Avram M Cooperman
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic fistula and postoperative pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Miroslav Ryska; Jan Rudis
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Defining the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy around the world.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Giuseppe Malleo; Claudio Bassi; Michael H Sprys; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  Pancreaticojejunostomy is comparable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Stefano Crippa; Roberto Cirocchi; Justus Randolph; Stefano Partelli; Giulio Belfiori; Alessandra Piccioli; Amilcare Parisi; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, predictors of severity and outcome. A single center experience of 588 cases.

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Waleed Askr; Youssef Mahdy; Ahmed Elgawalby; Mohamed El Sorogy; Mostaffa Abu Zeied; Talaat Abdallah; Mohamed Abd Elwahab
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Pancreaticojejunostomy With Externalized Stent vs Pancreaticogastrostomy With Externalized Stent for Patients With High-Risk Pancreatic Anastomosis: A Single-Center, Phase 3, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Giuseppe Malleo; Gaia Masini; Alberto Balduzzi; Salvatore Paiella; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Landoni; Luca Casetti; Massimiliano Tuveri; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 6.  Clinical trials to reduce pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery-review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yuji Kitahata; Manabu Kawai; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-16

Review 7.  [Pancreaticogastrostomy: when and how?]

Authors:  D Tittelbach-Helmrich; T Keck; U F Wellner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Comparison of Modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Shin-E Wang; Shih-Chin Chen; Bor-Uei Shyr; Yi-Ming Shyr
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Pancreatic Fistula and Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreatectomy: Where do We Stand?

Authors:  Ammar A Javed; Kanza Aziz; Fabio Bagante; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 10.  Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yao Cheng; Marta Briarava; Mingliang Lai; Xiaomei Wang; Bing Tu; Nansheng Cheng; Jianping Gong; Yuhong Yuan; Pierluigi Pilati; Simone Mocellin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.