Literature DB >> 20333381

Risk-adapted anastomosis for partial pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces the risk of pancreatic fistula: a pilot study.

Marco Niedergethmann1, Niloufar Dusch, Rizky Widyaningsih, Christel Weiss, Peter Kienle, Stefan Post.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula (PF) is the main cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality after pancreatectomy. Two reasons for PF are a "soft" pancreatic texture and a narrow pancreatic duct (high-risk gland). Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) may lead to a higher fistula rate in such glands. In the literature there are no data available on risk-adapted assignment of pancreatogastrostomy (PG) in a high-risk gland. Therefore, an observational pilot study was conducted to address this issue.
METHODS: Since January 2007 the concept of a "risk-adapted pancreatic anastomosis" (RAP) was introduced (PG for high-risk glands). The PF rate, morbidity, and mortality during this period (January 2007 to December 2008, n = 74) were compared to those between January 2004 and December 2006 (n = 119, only PJ). PF was defined according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery.
RESULTS: Through RAP the PF rate was reduced from 22 to 11% (P = 0.0503). Grade C PF rate was reduced from 6.7 to 1.4% (P = 0.1569) and grade A PF from 6 to 1.4% (P = 0.2537). The PF-associated mortality was reduced from 3.4 to 1.4%. PG revealed a PF rate of 7% and PJ accounted for 19% of PFs (P = 0.1765). There was no incidence of grade C PF following PG. The incidence of intraluminal hemorrhage (P = 0.0422) and delayed gastric emptying (P = 0.0572) was higher following PG.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of PF could be significantly reduced with the use of RAP. One should be cautious about the indication for PG, since it is associated with a higher rate of intraluminal hemorrhage and delayed gastric emptying. There are no long-term results on PG with respect to its durability and function. A general recommendation for its use cannot currently be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20333381     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0521-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  42 in total

Review 1.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Andrew L Warshaw; Sarah P Thayer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Pancreatogastrostomy: a safe drainage procedure after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  R Delcore; J H Thomas; G E Pierce; A S Hermreck
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Jeffrey S Barkun
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  An end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy using a mechanical purse-string device.

Authors:  M M Murr; D M Nagorney
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Min P Kim; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; Joann A Coleman; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Duffas; Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Gilles Fourtanier; Fabrice Muscari; Jean Marie Hay; Abe Fingerhut; Bertrand Millat; Alexandre Radovanowic; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience.

Authors:  Axel Richter; Marco Niedergethmann; Jörg W Sturm; Dietmar Lorenz; Stefan Post; Michael Trede
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Abe Fingerhut; Gilles Fourtanier; Jean-Marie Hay; Franck Holmières; Bernard Sastre; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis.

Authors:  Axel Kleespies; Markus Albertsmeier; Firas Obeidat; Hendrik Seeliger; Karl-Walter Jauch; Christiane J Bruns
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) of the pancreas: its diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

Authors:  Robert Grützmann; Stefan Post; Hans Detlev Saeger; Marco Niedergethmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Pancreaticogastrostomy for high-risk gland after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an eligible choice?

Authors:  Yang Sun Hu; Dou Ke Feng; Wang Hai Ying
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ulrich F Wellner; Olivia Sick; Manfred Olschewski; Ulrich Adam; Ulrich T Hopt; Tobias Keck
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  [Pancreaticogastrostomy: when and how?]

Authors:  D Tittelbach-Helmrich; T Keck; U F Wellner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Double omental flap reduced perianastomotic collections and relaparotomy rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Edoardo Rosso; Patricia Lopez; Marie Noel Roedlisch; Masato Narita; Elie Oussoultzoglou; Philippe Bachellier
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Emad Hamdy; Ahmad M Sultan; Tarek Salah; Waleed Askr; Helmy Ezzat; Mohamed Said; Mostaffa Abu Zeied; Tallat Abdallah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Hiromichi Kawaida; Hiroshi Kono; Naohiro Hosomura; Hidetake Amemiya; Jun Itakura; Hideki Fujii; Daisuke Ichikawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Modified technique of pancreaticogastrostomy for soft pancreas with two continuous hemstitch sutures: a single-center prospective study.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Min Wang; Xin Wang; Rui Tian; Chengjian Shi; Meng Xu; Ming Shen; Juan Han; Ninanian Luo; Renyi Qin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.