Literature DB >> 26373586

Defining the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy around the world.

Matthew T McMillan1, Giuseppe Malleo2, Claudio Bassi2, Michael H Sprys1, Charles M Vollmer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a technically challenging operation characterized by numerous management decisions.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that there is significant variation in the contemporary global practice of PD.
METHODS: A survey with native-language translation was distributed to members of 22 international gastrointestinal surgical societies. Practice patterns and surgical decision making for PD were assessed. Regions were categorized as North America, South/Central America, Asia/Australia, and Europe/Africa/Middle East.
RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 897 surgeons, representing six continents and eight languages. The median age and length of experience of respondents were 45 years and 13 years, respectively. In 2013, surgeons performed a median of 12 PDs and reported a median career total of 80 PDs; only 53.8% of respondents had surpassed the number of PDs considered necessary to surmount the learning curve (>60). Significant regional differences were observed in annual and career PD volumes (P < 0.001). Only 3.7% of respondents practised pancreas surgery exclusively, but 54.8% performed only hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Worldwide, the preferred form of anastomotic reconstruction was pancreatojejunostomy (88.7%). Regional variability was evident in terms of anastomotic/suture technique, stent use and drain use (including type and number), as well as in the use of octreotide, sealants and autologous patches (P < 0.02 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: Globally, there is significant variability in the practice of PD. Many of these choices contrast with established randomized evidence and may contribute to variance in outcomes.
© 2015 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26373586      PMCID: PMC4644368          DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  31 in total

1.  Use of the round ligament of the liver to decrease pancreatic fistulas: a novel technique.

Authors:  David A Iannitti; Natalie G Coburn; Joy Somberg; Beth A Ryder; Jack Monchik; William G Cioffi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; David C Chang; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; JoAnn Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Christopher J Sonnenday; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael R Marohn; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Giovanni Butturini; Abe Fingerhut; Charles Yeo; Jakob Izbicki; John Neoptolemos; Michael Sarr; William Traverso; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Hiroshi Terasawa; Shinomi Ina; Seiko Hirono; Ryohei Nishioka; Motoki Miyazawa; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The learning curve in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer F Tseng; Peter W T Pisters; Jeffrey E Lee; Huamin Wang; Henry F Gomez; Charlotte C Sun; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Duffas; Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Gilles Fourtanier; Fabrice Muscari; Jean Marie Hay; Abe Fingerhut; Bertrand Millat; Alexandre Radovanowic; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition.

Authors:  Moritz N Wente; Johannes A Veit; Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Abe Fingerhut; Dirk J Gouma; Jakob R Izbicki; John P Neoptolemos; Robert T Padbury; Michael G Sarr; Charles J Yeo; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with significantly less pancreatic fistula than pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Fu-Bao Liu; Jiang-Ming Chen; Wei Geng; Sheng-Xue Xie; Yi-Jun Zhao; Li-Quan Yu; Xiao-Ping Geng
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Benjamin Menahem; Lydia Guittet; Andrea Mulliri; Arnaud Alves; Jean Lubrano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  15 in total

1.  Evolving the Paradigm of Early Drain Removal Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Thomas F Seykora; Laura Maggino; Giuseppe Malleo; Major K Lee; Robert Roses; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Gregory T Kennedy; Matthew T McMillan; Michael H Sprys; Claudio Bassi; Paul D Greig; Paul D Hansen; Dhiresh R Jeyarajah; Tara S Kent; Giuseppe Malleo; Giovanni Marchegiani; Rebecca M Minter; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Why the Resistance: Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy-Saving the Patient from Tigers.

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal; Neeraj Dhamija; Shruti Sharma; Sneh Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Externalized Stents for Pancreatoduodenectomy Provide Value Only in High-Risk Scenarios.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Brett L Ecker; Stephen W Behrman; Mark P Callery; John D Christein; Jeffrey A Drebin; Douglas L Fraker; Tara S Kent; Major K Lee; Robert E Roses; Michael H Sprys; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Pancreaticojejunostomy With Externalized Stent vs Pancreaticogastrostomy With Externalized Stent for Patients With High-Risk Pancreatic Anastomosis: A Single-Center, Phase 3, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Giuseppe Malleo; Gaia Masini; Alberto Balduzzi; Salvatore Paiella; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Landoni; Luca Casetti; Massimiliano Tuveri; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Pancreatogastrostomy Vs. Pancreatojejunostomy: a Risk-Stratified Analysis of 5316 Pancreatoduodenectomies.

Authors:  Brett L Ecker; Matthew T McMillan; Laura Maggino; Valentina Allegrini; Horacio J Asbun; Chad G Ball; Claudio Bassi; Joal D Beane; Stephen W Behrman; Adam C Berger; Mark Bloomston; Mark P Callery; John D Christein; Euan Dickson; Elijah Dixon; Jeffrey A Drebin; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; William E Fisher; Zhi Ven Fong; Ericka Haverick; Robert H Hollis; Michael G House; Steven J Hughes; Nigel B Jamieson; Tara S Kent; Stacy J Kowalsky; John W Kunstman; Giuseppe Malleo; Ronald R Salem; Kevin C Soares; Vicente Valero; Ammara A Watkins; Christopher L Wolfgang; Amer H Zureikat; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Different types of pancreatico-enteric anastomosis.

Authors:  Savio George Barreto; Parul J Shukla
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-11-14

8.  Evidence Versus Practice in Early Drain Removal After Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Nicole Villafane-Ferriol; Katherine A Baugh; Amy L McElhany; George Van Buren; Andrew Fang; Erisha K Tashakori; Jose E Mendez Reyes; Hop S Tran Cao; Eric J Silberfein; Nader Massarweh; Cary Hsu; Omar Barakat; Carl Schmidt; Nicholas J Zyromski; Mary Dillhoff; Joshua A Villarreal; William E Fisher
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Polyester Preserves the Highest Breaking Point After Prolonged Incubation in Pancreatic Juice.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Biagio Anselmi; Erica Secchettin; Fabrizio Boriero; Giuseppe Malleo; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Recent Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Laura Maggino; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.