Literature DB >> 26722205

Pancreatic Fistula and Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreatectomy: Where do We Stand?

Ammar A Javed1, Kanza Aziz2, Fabio Bagante2, Christopher L Wolfgang2.   

Abstract

Pancreatic resection has become a feasible treatment of pancreatic neoplasms, and with improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative management, mortality associated with pancreatic surgery has decreased considerably. Despite this improvement, a high rate of complications is still associated with these procedures. Among these complications, delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) have a substantial impact on patient outcomes and burden our healthcare system. Technical modifications and postoperative approaches have been proposed to reduce rates of both POPF and DGE in patients undergoing pancreatectomy; however, to date, their rates have remained unchanged. In the present study, we summarize the findings of the most significant studies that have investigated these complications. In particular, several studies focused on technical modifications including extent of dissection, stent placement, nature of anastomosis, type of reconstruction, and application of biological or non-biological agents to site of anastomosis. Moreover, postoperatively, drain placement, duration of drain usage, postoperative feeding, and use of pharmacological agents were studied to reduce rates of POPF and DGE. In this review, we summarize the most relevant literature on this fundamental aspect of pancreatic surgery. Despite studies identifying the potential benefit of technical modifications and postoperative approaches, these findings remain controversial and suggest need for further extensive investigation. Most importantly, we recommend that all surgeons performing these procedures base their practice on the most updated and highest available level of evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Delayed gastric emptying; Pancreatic surgery; Postoperative outcomes; Postoperative pancreatic fistula

Year:  2015        PMID: 26722205      PMCID: PMC4689708          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1366-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  113 in total

1.  Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; David C Chang; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; JoAnn Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Christopher J Sonnenday; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael R Marohn; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Improvement of delayed gastric emptying in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Hiroshi Terasawa; Manabu Kawai; Shinomi Ina; Seiko Hirono; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A prospective randomized comparison between pylorus- and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy on postoperative delayed gastric emptying occurrence and long-term nutritional status.

Authors:  Ippei Matsumoto; Makoto Shinzeki; Sadaki Asari; Tadahiro Goto; Sachiyo Shirakawa; Tetsuo Ajiki; Takumi Fukumoto; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Yonson Ku
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

Review 6.  Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Christina Fitzmaurice; Guido Schwarzer; Christoph M Seiler; Felix J Hüttner; Gerd Antes; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-11

7.  Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  R E Jimenez; C Fernandez-del Castillo; D W Rattner; Y Chang; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Is pylorospasm a cause of delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Dong K Kim; Alexander A Hindenburg; Sushil K Sharma; Chang Ho Suk; Frank G Gress; Harry Staszewski; James H Grendell; William P Reed
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Inga Rossion; Jörg Kleeff; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Ales Tomazic; Christiane J Bruns; Olivier R C Busch; Stefan Farkas; Orlin Belyaev; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran; Tobias Keck; Marco Niedergethmann; Klaus Gellert; Helmut Witzigmann; Otto Kollmar; Peter Langer; Ulrich Steger; Jens Neudecker; Frederik Berrevoet; Silke Ganzera; Markus M Heiss; Steffen P Luntz; Thomas Bruckner; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Abe Fingerhut; Gilles Fourtanier; Jean-Marie Hay; Franck Holmières; Bernard Sastre; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive central pancreatectomy and pancreatogastrostomy: current surgical technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Ammar A Javed; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-08-10

2.  Post-discharge venous thromboembolism after pancreatectomy for malignancy: Predicting risk based on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors.

Authors:  Cary Jo R Schlick; Ryan P Merkow; Anthony D Yang; David J Bentrem
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.454

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.