Literature DB >> 24466384

Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now.

Errol R Norwitz1, Brynn Levy2.   

Abstract

Prenatal detection of chromosome abnormalities has been offered for more than 40 years, first by amniocentesis in the early 1970s and additionally by chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in the early 1980s. Given the well-recognized association between increasing maternal age and trisomy,1-3 the primary utilization of prenatal testing has been by older mothers. This has drastically reduced the incidence of aneuploid children born to older mothers.4 Although younger women have relatively low risks of conceiving a child with aneuploidy, the majority of pregnant women are in their late teens, 20s, and early 30s. As such, most viable aneuploid babies are born to these younger mothers.5 Invasive prenatal diagnosis (CVS and amniocentesis) is not a feasible option for all low-risk mothers, as these procedures carry a small but finite risk and would ultimately cause more miscarriages than they would detect aneuploidy. For this reason, a number of noninvasive tests have been developed-including first-trimester risk assessment at 11 to 14 weeks, maternal serum analyte (quad) screening at 15 to 20 weeks, and sonographic fetal structural survey at 18 to 22 weeks-all of which are designed to give a woman an adjusted (more accurate) estimate of having an aneuploid fetus using as baseline her a priori age-related risk. Ultrasound and maternal serum analysis are considered screening procedures and both require follow up by CVS or amniocentesis in screen-positive cases for a definitive diagnosis of a chromosome abnormality in the fetus. The ability to isolate fetal cells and fetal DNA from maternal blood during pregnancy has opened up exciting opportunities for improved noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Direct analysis of fetal cells from maternal circulation has been challenging given the scarcity of fetal cells in maternal blood (1:10,000-1:1,000,000) and the focus has shifted to the analysis of cell-free fetal DNA, which is found at a concentration almost 25 times higher than that available from nucleated blood cells extracted from a similar volume of whole maternal blood. There have now been numerous reports on the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for NIPT for chromosomal aneuploidies-especially trisomy (an extra copy of a chromosome) or monosomy (a missing chromosome)-and a number of commercial products are already being marketed for this indication. This article reviews the various techniques being used to analyze cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation for the prenatal detection of chromosome abnormalities and the evidence in support of each. A number of areas of ongoing controversy are addressed, including the timing of maternal blood sampling, the need for genetic counseling, and the use of confirmatory invasive testing. Future applications for this technology are also reviewed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-free fetal DNA; Noninvasive prenatal testing; Prenatal diagnosis; Trisomy 21

Year:  2013        PMID: 24466384      PMCID: PMC3893900     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1941-2797


  95 in total

1.  First trimester prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in fetal cells from maternal blood.

Authors:  S Elias; J Price; M Dockter; S Wachtel; A Tharapel; J L Simpson; K W Klinger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-10-24       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells.

Authors:  R E BILLINGHAM; L BRENT; P B MEDAWAR
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1953-10-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Chromosome abnormalities investigated by non-invasive prenatal testing account for approximately 50% of fetal unbalances associated with relevant clinical phenotypes.

Authors:  Francesca Romana Grati; Andrea Barlocco; Beatrice Grimi; Silvia Milani; Giuditta Frascoli; Anna Maria Di Meco; Rosaria Liuti; Anna Trotta; Sara Chinetti; Francesca Dulcetti; Anna Maria Ruggeri; Simona De Toffol; Maurizio Clementi; Federico Maggi; Giuseppe Simoni
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  First-trimester nasal bone evaluation for aneuploidy in the general population.

Authors:  Fergal D Malone; Robert H Ball; David A Nyberg; Christine H Comstock; George Saade; Richard L Berkowitz; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Tara Tripp; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  The use of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Caroline F Wright; Hilary Burton
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; Lawrence D Platt; James D Goldberg; Alfred Z Abuhamad; Amy J Sehnert; Richard P Rava
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Detection of fetal trisomies 21 and 18 from maternal blood using triple gradient and magnetic cell sorting.

Authors:  D Gänshirt-Ahlert; R Börjesson-Stoll; M Burschyk; A Dohr; H S Garritsen; E Helmer; P Miny; M Velasco; C Walde; D Patterson
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 9.  Isolating fetal cells from maternal blood. Advances in prenatal diagnosis through molecular technology.

Authors:  J L Simpson; S Elias
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Sequential pathways of testing after first-trimester screening for trisomy 21.

Authors:  Lawrence D Platt; Naomi Greene; Anthony Johnson; Julia Zachary; Elizabeth Thom; David Krantz; Joe Leigh Simpson; Richard K Silver; Rosalinde J M Snijders; Laura Goetzl; Eugene Pergament; Karen Filkins; Maurice J Mahoney; W Allen Hogge; R Douglas Wilson; Patrick Mohide; Douglas Hershey; Scott MacGregor; Ray Bahado-Singh; Laird G Jackson; Ronald Wapner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  43 in total

1.  "This lifetime commitment": Public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening.

Authors:  Rosemary J Steinbach; Megan Allyse; Marsha Michie; Emily Y Liu; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 2.  Next-generation molecular diagnosis: single-cell sequencing from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Wanjun Zhu; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Sadie L Marjani; Jialing Zhang; Wengeng Zhang; Shixiu Wu; Xinghua Pan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Cell Free Fetal DNA: Marker for Predicting Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Subir Kumar Das; Mriganka Mouli Saha
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2017-07-03

4.  Investigation of the Capture of Magnetic Particles From High-Viscosity Fluids Using Permanent Magnets.

Authors:  Alexandra Garraud; Camilo Velez; Yash Shah; Nicolas Garraud; Bettina Kozissnik; Elena G Yarmola; Kyle D Allen; Jon Dobson; David P Arnold
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Trophoblast retrieval and isolation from the cervix (TRIC) is unaffected by early gestational age or maternal obesity.

Authors:  Rani Fritz; Hamid Reza Kohan-Ghadr; Alex Sacher; Alan D Bolnick; Brian A Kilburn; Jay M Bolnick; Michael P Diamond; Sascha Drewlo; D Randall Armant
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 6.  Defining the Clinical Value of a Genomic Diagnosis in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Natasha T Strande; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 8.929

7.  About one-half of early spontaneous preterm deliveries can be identified by a rapid matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) bedside test at the time of mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis.

Authors:  Sun Min Kim; Roberto Romero; JoonHo Lee; Piya Chaemsaithong; Min-Woo Lee; Noppadol Chaiyasit; Hyo-Jin Lee; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-12-07

8.  Relationship between blastocoel cell-free DNA and day-5 blastocyst morphology.

Authors:  Kiersten Rule; Renee J Chosed; T Arthur Chang; J David Wininger; William E Roudebush
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Recent omics technologies and their emerging applications for personalised medicine.

Authors:  Dong-Hyuk Kim; Young-Sook Kim; Nam-Il Son; Chan-Koo Kang; Ah-Ram Kim
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.615

Review 10.  Current Overview of Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Authors:  Mari Deguchi; Shunichiro Tsuji; Daisuke Katsura; Kyoko Kasahara; Fuminori Kimura; Takashi Murakami
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.