Literature DB >> 20503318

Chromosome abnormalities investigated by non-invasive prenatal testing account for approximately 50% of fetal unbalances associated with relevant clinical phenotypes.

Francesca Romana Grati1, Andrea Barlocco, Beatrice Grimi, Silvia Milani, Giuditta Frascoli, Anna Maria Di Meco, Rosaria Liuti, Anna Trotta, Sara Chinetti, Francesca Dulcetti, Anna Maria Ruggeri, Simona De Toffol, Maurizio Clementi, Federico Maggi, Giuseppe Simoni.   

Abstract

During the past 20 years non-invasive screening tests have been increasingly utilized in prenatal diagnosis (PD) practice. Considerable effort has been exerted by multicenter consortia to evaluate the reliability of non-invasive screening tests in detecting those women with an increased risk of having a pregnancy affected by trisomies 21, 18, and 13, monosomy X, and triploidies. To what extent this group of abnormal karyotypes accounts for the total number of phenotypically relevant fetal chromosome abnormalities has, however, never been investigated. The present report is an attempt aimed to quantify this proportion. A retrospective analysis of a homogeneous survey of 115,128 consecutive invasive prenatal tests was undertaken. All cases were classified in accordance with the indication given for the invasive testing. Cytogenetic results regarding 96,416 karyotype analyses performed because of advanced maternal age (>or=35 years) or gestational anxiety (<35 years) were considered since these are the patients who usually undergo non-invasive screening tests. We calculated the number of cases (T21, T18, T13, 45,X, and triploidy) that would have been detected by prenatal screening on the basis of the published detection rate of the combined-2 test or the quadruple test. Our findings indicate that the chromosomal abnormalities investigated by screening tests represent <50% of the fetal chromosomal abnormalities associated with an abnormal outcome ranging from intermediate-to-severe in women <35 years (45.8% and 39.6% in the first and second trimesters, respectively), and sensitivity >50% in women >or=35 years (65.1% and 61.8%, respectively). To conclude, approximately 50% of the phenotypically relevant abnormal karyotypes cannot be detected by non-invasive prenatal screening tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20503318     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  14 in total

1.  Assessment of Foetal DNA in Maternal Blood - A Useful Tool in the Hands of Prenatal Specialists.

Authors:  K O Kagan; M Hoopmann; P Kozlowski
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 3.  First and second trimester serum tests with and without first trimester ultrasound tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

4.  BACs-on-Beads™ assay, a rapid aneuploidy test, improves the diagnostic yield of conventional karyotyping.

Authors:  Chantal Farra; Anwar H Nassar; Fadi Mirza; Lina Abdouni; Mirna Souaid; Johnny Awwad
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  A prospective clinical trial to compare the performance of dried blood spots prenatal screening for Down's syndrome with conventional non-invasive testing technology.

Authors:  Huiying Hu; Yulin Jiang; Minghui Zhang; Shanying Liu; Na Hao; Jing Zhou; Juntao Liu; Xiaojin Zhang; Liangkun Ma
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-01-05

6.  Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Kyle J Tobler; Paul R Brezina; Andrew T Benner; Luke Du; Xin Xu; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now.

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; Brynn Levy
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

Review 8.  First trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

9.  Prenatal diagnosis of 17p13.1p13.3 duplication.

Authors:  Kirsi Kiiski; Tiiu Roovere; Riina Zordania; Harriet von Koskull; Nina Horelli-Kuitunen
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 10.  Beyond Trisomy 21: Additional Chromosomal Anomalies Detected through Routine Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Catriona Hippman; Melanie Pastuck; Jo-Ann Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.