Literature DB >> 15572480

First-trimester nasal bone evaluation for aneuploidy in the general population.

Fergal D Malone1, Robert H Ball, David A Nyberg, Christine H Comstock, George Saade, Richard L Berkowitz, Lorraine Dugoff, Sabrina D Craigo, Stephen R Carr, Honor M Wolfe, Tara Tripp, Mary E D'Alton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of fetal nasal bone imaging at 10 3/7 to 13 6/7 weeks as a screening tool for aneuploidy, in a prospective multicenter trial.
METHODS: Unselected patients from the general population with viable singleton pregnancies at 10 3/7 to 13 6/7 weeks were recruited at 15 U.S. centers. All had screening with nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasound by specially trained sonographers. In the last 8 months of this trial, first trimester nasal bone evaluation was added to the screening protocol. Nasal bones were described as present, absent, or unable to determine.
RESULTS: A total of 38,189 patients completed first trimester NT screening, of whom 6,324 also underwent nasal bone sonography. An acceptable nasal image was obtained in 4,801 cases (76%), with nasal bones described as present in 4,779 (99.5%), and absent in 22 (0.5%). There were 11 identified cases of trisomy-21 in the population of 6,324 patients. In 9 of the 11 cases (82%) the nasal bones were described as present, and 2 cases were described as unable to determine. The only other aneuploidies were 2 cases of trisomy-18, in 1 of which the nasal bones were described as absent, and in 1 present. Absence of nasal bones had sensitivity for aneuploidy of 7.7%, false-positive rate 0.3%, and positive predictive value 4.5%.
CONCLUSION: First-trimester nasal bone evaluation was not a useful test for population screening for trisomy-21 and added little to first-trimester NT screening. The difficulty in performing first-trimester nasal bone sonography consistently, in the general population setting, will significantly limit the usefulness of this aneuploidy screening technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15572480     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000143255.46196.7a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 3.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now.

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; Brynn Levy
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

4.  Adjusted classification for ultrasound scoring index for antenatal detection of fetal trisomy.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05

Review 5.  2014 First-trimester ultrasound forum from the Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Soo-Young Oh; Joon Seok Hong; Hyun-Joo Seol; Han Sung Hwang; Hyun Soo Park; Kunwoo Kim; Hyun Sun Ko; Dong-Wook Kwak; Moon Young Kim; Mi Hye Park; Min Jeong Oh; Joong Shin Park; Sa Jin Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-01-16

6.  Reliability of fetal nasal bone length measurement at 11-14 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Chitkasaem Suwanrath; Ninlapa Pruksanusak; Ounjai Kor-Anantakul; Thitima Suntharasaj; Tharangrut Hanprasertpong; Savitree Pranpanus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.