Literature DB >> 25673736

Formation of model-free motor memories during motor adaptation depends on perturbation schedule.

Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry1, Philippe Lefèvre2.   

Abstract

Motor adaptation to an external perturbation relies on several mechanisms such as model-based, model-free, strategic, or repetition-dependent learning. Depending on the experimental conditions, each of these mechanisms has more or less weight in the final adaptation state. Here we focused on the conditions that lead to the formation of a model-free motor memory (Huang VS, Haith AM, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Neuron 70: 787-801, 2011), i.e., a memory that does not depend on an internal model or on the size or direction of the errors experienced during the learning. The formation of such model-free motor memory was hypothesized to depend on the schedule of the perturbation (Orban de Xivry JJ, Ahmadi-Pajouh MA, Harran MD, Salimpour Y, Shadmehr R. J Neurophysiol 109: 124-136, 2013). Here we built on this observation by directly testing the nature of the motor memory after abrupt or gradual introduction of a visuomotor rotation, in an experimental paradigm where the presence of model-free motor memory can be identified (Huang VS, Haith AM, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Neuron 70: 787-801, 2011). We found that relearning was faster after abrupt than gradual perturbation, which suggests that model-free learning is reduced during gradual adaptation to a visuomotor rotation. In addition, the presence of savings after abrupt introduction of the perturbation but gradual extinction of the motor memory suggests that unexpected errors are necessary to induce a model-free motor memory. Overall, these data support the hypothesis that different perturbation schedules do not lead to a more or less stabilized motor memory but to distinct motor memories with different attributes and neural representations.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  model-free memory; motor adaptation; motor learning; visuomotor rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25673736      PMCID: PMC4416610          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00673.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  60 in total

1.  Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning.

Authors:  E J Plautz; G W Milliken; R J Nudo
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Contributions of the motor cortex to adaptive control of reaching depend on the perturbation schedule.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Protection and expression of human motor memories.

Authors:  Sarah E Pekny; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  How each movement changes the next: an experimental and theoretical study of fast adaptive priors in reaching.

Authors:  Timothy Verstynen; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains.

Authors:  Mitsunari Abe; Heidi Schambra; Eric M Wassermann; Dave Luckenbaugh; Nicolas Schweighofer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning.

Authors:  Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Amy J Bastian; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  C M Bütefisch; B C Davis; S P Wise; L Sawaki; L Kopylev; J Classen; L G Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  20 in total

1.  Formation of a long-term memory for visuomotor adaptation following only a few trials of practice.

Authors:  David M Huberdeau; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The 24-h savings of adaptation to novel movement dynamics initially reflects the recall of previous performance.

Authors:  Katrina P Nguyen; Weiwei Zhou; Erin McKenna; Katrina Colucci-Chang; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Eghbal A Hosseini; Laith Alhussein; Meena Rezazad; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Task Errors Drive Memories That Improve Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Savings for visuomotor adaptation require prior history of error, not prior repetition of successful actions.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Aymar de Rugy; Welber Marinovic; Stephan Riek; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Disruption of M1 Activity during Performance Plateau Impairs Consolidation of Motor Memories.

Authors:  Raphaël Hamel; Maxime Trempe; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Accelerating locomotor savings in learning: compressing four training days to one.

Authors:  Kevin A Day; Kristan A Leech; Ryan T Roemmich; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Interactions between motor exploration and reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Shintaro Uehara; Firas Mawase; Amanda S Therrien; Kendra M Cherry-Allen; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; Kwang S Kim; Prince Z Wang; Robert J Hermosillo; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

9.  Savings upon Re-Aiming in Visuomotor Adaptation.

Authors:  J Ryan Morehead; Salman E Qasim; Matthew J Crossley; Richard Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Increased Adaptation Rates and Reduction in Trial-by-Trial Variability in Subjects with Cerebral Palsy Following a Multi-session Locomotor Adaptation Training.

Authors:  Firas Mawase; Simona Bar-Haim; Katherin Joubran; Lihi Rubin; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.