Literature DB >> 15101652

Simulations of cochlear implant hearing using filtered harmonic complexes: implications for concurrent sound segregation.

John M Deeks1, Robert P Carlyon.   

Abstract

Two experiments used simulations of cochlear implant hearing to investigate the use of temporal codes in speech segregation. Sentences were filtered into six bands, and their envelopes used to modulate filtered alternating-phase harmonic complexes with rates of 80 or 140 pps. Experiment 1 showed that identification of single sentences was better for the higher rate. In experiment 2, maskers (time-reversed concatenated sentences) were scaled by -9 dB relative to a target sentence, which was added with an offset of 1.2 s. When the target and masker were each processed on all six channels, and then summed, processing the masker on a different rate to the target improved performance only when the target rate was 140 pps. When the target sentence was processed on the odd-numbered channels and the masker on the even-numbered channels, or vice versa, performance was worse overall, but showed similar effects of pulse rate. The results, combined with recent psychophysical evidence, suggest that differences in pulse rate are unlikely to prove useful for concurrent sound segregation.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15101652     DOI: 10.1121/1.1675814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Streaming of vowel sequences based on fundamental frequency in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of electrode separation between speech and noise signals on consonant identification in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Simultaneous grouping in cochlear implant listeners: can abrupt changes in level be used to segregate components from a complex tone?

Authors:  Huw R Cooper; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-14

5.  Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; David A Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30

6.  Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-22

7.  Training improves cochlear implant rate discrimination on a psychophysical task.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Steven P Gianakas; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.