Literature DB >> 26723103

Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.

Yune-Sang Lee1, Nam Eun Min2, Arthur Wingfield3, Murray Grossman2, Jonathan E Peelle4.   

Abstract

The information contained in a sensory signal plays a critical role in determining what neural processes are engaged. Here we used interleaved silent steady-state (ISSS) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore how human listeners cope with different degrees of acoustic richness during auditory sentence comprehension. Twenty-six healthy young adults underwent scanning while hearing sentences that varied in acoustic richness (high vs. low spectral detail) and syntactic complexity (subject-relative vs. object-relative center-embedded clause structures). We manipulated acoustic richness by presenting the stimuli as unprocessed full-spectrum speech, or noise-vocoded with 24 channels. Importantly, although the vocoded sentences were spectrally impoverished, all sentences were highly intelligible. These manipulations allowed us to test how intelligible speech processing was affected by orthogonal linguistic and acoustic demands. Acoustically rich speech showed stronger activation than acoustically less-detailed speech in a bilateral temporoparietal network with more pronounced activity in the right hemisphere. By contrast, listening to sentences with greater syntactic complexity resulted in increased activation of a left-lateralized network including left posterior lateral temporal cortex, left inferior frontal gyrus, and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Significant interactions between acoustic richness and syntactic complexity occurred in left supramarginal gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus, and right inferior frontal gyrus, indicating that the regions recruited for syntactic challenge differed as a function of acoustic properties of the speech. Our findings suggest that the neural systems involved in speech perception are finely tuned to the type of information available, and that reducing the richness of the acoustic signal dramatically alters the brain's response to spoken language, even when intelligibility is high.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic; Executive function; Hearing; Language; Listening effort; Speech; Vocoding; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26723103      PMCID: PMC4798890          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  52 in total

1.  Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity.

Authors:  Arthur Wingfield; Sandra L McCoy; Jonathan E Peelle; Patricia A Tun; L Clarke Cox
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Frank Eisner; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-22

Review 5.  Cortical asymmetries in speech perception: what's wrong, what's right and what's left?

Authors:  Carolyn McGettigan; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation.

Authors:  Edward Gibson; Leon Bergen; Steven T Piantadosi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Richard J S Wise; M Alex Dresner; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) imaging: a new sparse imaging method applied to auditory fMRI.

Authors:  Christian Schwarzbauer; Matt H Davis; Jennifer M Rodd; Ingrid Johnsrude
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The pathways for intelligible speech: multivariate and univariate perspectives.

Authors:  S Evans; J S Kyong; S Rosen; N Golestani; J E Warren; C McGettigan; J Mourão-Miranda; R J S Wise; S K Scott
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  8 in total

1.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Cognitive and neural predictors of speech comprehension in noisy backgrounds in older adults.

Authors:  Megan C Fitzhugh; Sydney Y Schaefer; Leslie C Baxter; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 3.  Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Differences in Hearing Acuity among "Normal-Hearing" Young Adults Modulate the Neural Basis for Speech Comprehension.

Authors:  Yune S Lee; Arthur Wingfield; Nam-Eun Min; Ethan Kotloff; Murray Grossman; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-06-08

Review 5.  Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Dorothea Wendt; Thomas Koelewijn; Stefanie E Kuchinsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  The effect of age-related hearing loss and listening effort on resting state connectivity.

Authors:  Stephanie Rosemann; Christiane M Thiel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Perceptual Doping: An Audiovisual Facilitation Effect on Auditory Speech Processing, From Phonetic Feature Extraction to Sentence Identification in Noise.

Authors:  Shahram Moradi; Björn Lidestam; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Henrik Danielsson; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention Impairment Induced by Long-Term Exposure to Noise in the Absence of Threshold Shifts.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Xuan Huang; Jiajia Zhang; Shujian Huang; Jiping Wang; Yanmei Feng; Zhuang Jiang; Hui Wang; Shankai Yin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.