Literature DB >> 24442551

Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention.

Laura Rerko1, Alessandra S Souza, Klaus Oberauer.   

Abstract

In working memory (WM) tasks, performance can be boosted by directing attention to one memory object: When a retro-cue in the retention interval indicates which object will be tested, responding is faster and more accurate (the retro-cue benefit). We tested whether the retro-cue benefit in WM depends on sustained attention to the cued object by inserting an attention-demanding interruption task between the retro-cue and the memory test. In the first experiment, the interruption task required participants to shift their visual attention away from the cued representation and to a visual classification task on colors. In the second and third experiments, the interruption task required participants to shift their focal attention within WM: Attention was directed away from the cued representation by probing another representation from the memory array prior to probing the cued object. The retro-cue benefit was not attenuated by shifts of perceptual attention or by shifts of attention within WM. We concluded that sustained attention is not needed to maintain the cued representation in a state of heightened accessibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24442551     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0392-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  46 in total

1.  Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Authors:  Ivan C Griffin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Common fronto-parietal activity in attention, memory, and consciousness: shared demands on integration?

Authors:  Hamid Reza Naghavi; Lars Nyberg
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2004-12-08

3.  Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: protection or prioritization?

Authors:  Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-11

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: experiments and a computational model.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Alessandra S Souza; Michel D Druey; Miriam Gade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory.

Authors:  Laura Rerko; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  The benefit of forgetting.

Authors:  Melonie Williams; Sang W Hong; Min-Suk Kang; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

10.  Spatial attention can bias search in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Anna C Nobre; Ivan C Griffin; Anling Rao
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  26 in total

1.  Setting and changing feature priorities in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Zampeta Kalogeropoulou; Akshay V Jagadeesh; Sven Ohl; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

2.  Feature-based guidance of attention by visual working memory is applied independently of remembered object location.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Brett Bahle
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Behavioral and Neural Markers of Flexible Attention over Working Memory in Aging.

Authors:  Robert M Mok; Nicholas E Myers; George Wallis; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Retrospective Cues Mitigate Information Loss in Human Cortex during Working Memory Storage.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Asal Nouri; Laura Rodriguez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Clayton E Curtis; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Post-encoding control of working memory enhances processing of relevant information in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-02-17

7.  Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 8.  Prioritizing Information during Working Memory: Beyond Sustained Internal Attention.

Authors:  Nicholas E Myers; Mark G Stokes; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Eren Gunseli; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Temporal dynamics of attention during encoding versus maintenance of working memory: complementary views from event-related potentials and alpha-band oscillations.

Authors:  Nicholas E Myers; Lena Walther; George Wallis; Mark G Stokes; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.