Literature DB >> 30126971

Retrospective Cues Mitigate Information Loss in Human Cortex during Working Memory Storage.

Edward F Ester1,2,3, Asal Nouri4,3, Laura Rodriguez4.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) enables the flexible representation of information over short intervals. It is well established that WM performance can be enhanced by a retrospective cue presented during storage, yet the neural mechanisms responsible for this benefit are unclear. Here, we tested several explanations for retrospective cue benefits by quantifying changes in spatial WM representations reconstructed from alpha-band (8-12 Hz) EEG activity recorded from human participants (both sexes) before and after the presentation of a retrospective cue. This allowed us to track cue-related changes in WM representations with high temporal resolution (tens of milliseconds). Participants encoded the locations of two colored discs for subsequent report. During neutral trials, an uninformative cue instructed participants to remember the locations of both discs across a blank delay, and we observed a monotonic decrease in the fidelity of reconstructed spatial WM representations with time. During valid trials, a 100% reliable cue indicated that the color of the disc participants would be probed to report. Critically, valid cues were presented immediately after the termination of the encoding display ["valid early" (VE) trials] or midway through the delay period ["valid late" (VL) trials]. During VE trials, the gradual loss of location-specific information observed during neutral trials was eliminated, while during VL trials it was partially reversed. Our findings suggest that retrospective cues engage several different mechanisms that together serve to mitigate information loss during WM storage.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Working memory (WM) performance can be improved by a cue presented during storage. This effect, termed a retrospective cue benefit, has been used to explore the limitations of attentional prioritization in WM. However, the mechanisms responsible for retrospective cue benefits are unclear. Here we tested several explanations for retrospective cue benefits by examining how they influence WM representations reconstructed from human EEG activity. This approach allowed us to visualize, quantify, and track the effects of retrospective cues with high temporal resolution (on the order of tens of milliseconds). We show that under different circumstances retrospective cues can both eliminate and even partially reverse information loss during WM storage, suggesting that retrospective cue benefits have manifold origins.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/388538-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; alpha band; retrospective cue; selective attention; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30126971      PMCID: PMC6596221          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1566-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  49 in total

1.  Unloading and reloading working memory: attending to one item frees capacity.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Laura Rerko; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; David W Sutterer; John T Serences; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Restoration of fMRI Decodability Does Not Imply Latent Working Memory States.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Joshua J Foster; David W Sutterer; John T Serences; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-05-24

Review 5.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Method matters: systematic effects of testing procedure on visual working memory sensitivity.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Leah M Watson; Wilma Koutstaal; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Pim Mostert; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Decoding attended information in short-term memory: an EEG study.

Authors:  Joshua J LaRocque; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Andrew T Drysdale; Klaus Oberauer; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Mnemonic and attentional roles for states of attenuated alpha oscillations in perceptual working memory: a review.

Authors:  Freek van Ede
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Temporal dynamics of attention during encoding versus maintenance of working memory: complementary views from event-related potentials and alpha-band oscillations.

Authors:  Nicholas E Myers; Lena Walther; George Wallis; Mark G Stokes; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The role of alpha oscillations in spatial attention: limited evidence for a suppression account.

Authors:  Joshua J Foster; Edward Awh
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-08

2.  Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Clayton E Curtis; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Categorical Biases in Human Occipitoparietal Cortex.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  α-Band activity tracks a two-dimensional spotlight of attention during spatial working memory maintenance.

Authors:  David W Sutterer; Sean M Polyn; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Lateralized alpha oscillations are irrelevant for the behavioral retro-cueing benefit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Wanja A Mössing; Niko A Busch
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Item-specific delay activity demonstrates concurrent storage of multiple active neural representations in working memory.

Authors:  David W Sutterer; Joshua J Foster; Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Resting state electroencephalographic rhythms are affected by immediately preceding memory demands in cognitively unimpaired elderly and patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Alba Fernández; Giuseppe Noce; Claudio Del Percio; Diego Pinal; Fernando Díaz; Cristina Lojo-Seoane; Montserrat Zurrón; Claudio Babiloni
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.702

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.