Literature DB >> 23421511

Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory.

Laura Rerko1, Klaus Oberauer.   

Abstract

The study investigated the effect of selection cues in working memory (WM) on the fate of not-selected contents of WM. Experiments 1A and 1B showed that focusing on 1 cued item in WM does not impair memory for the remaining items. The nonfocused items are maintained in WM even when this is not required by the task. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that items that were once focused in WM remain strengthened after the focus shifts away from them. When defocused items are presented as mismatching recognition probes, they are rejected better than other mismatching probes (Experiments 2 and 3). When a defocused item was later cued again, such that the focus had to shift back to it, that item was recognized better than an item cued for the first time (Experiment 3). The results support the distinction between mechanisms for temporary maintenance and the focus of attention in WM, and they challenge theories that explain maintenance and focusing by the same mechanisms, such as a limited number of slots or a limited resource. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23421511     DOI: 10.1037/a0031172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  45 in total

1.  Erratum to: The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Eren Gunseli; Dirk van Moorselaar; Martijn Meeter; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

2.  Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Feature-based and object-based attention orientation during short-term memory maintenance.

Authors:  Yixuan Ku
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Eren Gunseli; Dirk van Moorselaar; Martijn Meeter; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

5.  Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; J Douglas Crawford; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

6.  Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm.

Authors:  Zhuolun Li; Mengxuan Tong; Shiting Chen; Jiehui Qian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Setting and changing feature priorities in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Zampeta Kalogeropoulou; Akshay V Jagadeesh; Sven Ohl; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

8.  Restoration of fMRI Decodability Does Not Imply Latent Working Memory States.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Retrospective Attention in Short-Term Memory Has a Lasting Effect on Long-Term Memory Across Age.

Authors:  Jonathan Strunk; Lauren Morgan; Sarah Reaves; Paul Verhaeghen; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Behavioral and Neural Markers of Flexible Attention over Working Memory in Aging.

Authors:  Robert M Mok; Nicholas E Myers; George Wallis; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.