Literature DB >> 35927036

Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.

Ying Zhou1,2, Clayton E Curtis2,3, Kartik K Sreenivasan4,2,5, Daryl Fougnie4,2.   

Abstract

Although previous studies point to qualitative similarities between working memory (WM) and attention, the degree to which these two constructs rely on shared neural mechanisms remains unknown. Focusing on one such potentially shared mechanism, we tested the hypothesis that selecting an item within WM utilizes similar neural mechanisms as selecting a visible item via a shift of attention. We used fMRI and machine learning to decode both the selection among items visually available and the selection among items stored in WM in human subjects (both sexes). Patterns of activity in visual, parietal, and to a lesser extent frontal cortex predicted the locations of the selected items. Critically, these patterns were strikingly interchangeable; classifiers trained on data during attentional selection predicted selection from WM, and classifiers trained on data during selection from memory predicted attentional selection. Using models of voxel receptive fields, we visualized topographic population activity that revealed gain enhancements at the locations of the externally and internally selected items. Our results suggest that selecting among perceived items and selecting among items in WM share a common mechanism. This common mechanism, analogous to a shift of spatial attention, controls the relative gains of neural populations that encode behaviorally relevant information.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT How we allocate our attention to external stimuli that we see and to internal representations of stimuli stored in memory might rely on a common mechanism. Supporting this hypothesis, we demonstrated that not only could patterns of human brain activity predict which items were selected during perception and memory, but that these patterns were interchangeable during external and internal selection. Additionally, this generalized selection mechanism operates by changes in the gains of the neural populations both encoding attended sensory representations and storing relevant memory representations.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; decoding; fMRI; selection; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35927036      PMCID: PMC9480871          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-22.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  116 in total

1.  Interactions between working memory, attention and eye movements.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Artem Belopolsky; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-23

2.  Cortical activity time locked to the shift and maintenance of spatial attention.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  S J Luck; L Chelazzi; S A Hillyard; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Yoni Pertzov
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Influence of activation pattern estimates and statistical significance tests in fMRI decoding analysis.

Authors:  Juan E Arco; Carlos González-García; Paloma Díaz-Gutiérrez; Javier Ramírez; María Ruz
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Laura Rerko; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

8.  Orientation decoding depends on maps, not columns.

Authors:  Jeremy Freeman; Gijs Joost Brouwer; David J Heeger; Elisha P Merriam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  John T Serences; Edward F Ester; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-01-08

Review 10.  Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: a tutorial overview.

Authors:  Francisco Pereira; Tom Mitchell; Matthew Botvinick
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.