Literature DB >> 24437857

Contour identification with pitch and loudness cues using cochlear implants.

Xin Luo1, Megan E Masterson1, Ching-Chih Wu1.   

Abstract

Different from speech, pitch and loudness cues may or may not co-vary in music. Cochlear implant (CI) users with poor pitch perception may use loudness contour cues more than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Contour identification was tested in CI users and NH listeners; the five-note contours contained either pitch cues alone, loudness cues alone, or both. Results showed that NH listeners' contour identification was better with pitch cues than with loudness cues; CI users performed similarly with either cues. When pitch and loudness cues were co-varied, CI performance significantly improved, suggesting that CI users were able to integrate the two cues.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24437857      PMCID: PMC3874060          DOI: 10.1121/1.4832915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Dynamic frequency change influences loudness perception: a central, analytic process.

Authors:  J G Neuhoff; M K McBeath; W C Wanzie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB)--a procedure for the assessment of loudness.

Authors:  J B Allen; J L Hall; P S Jeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Marion Cousineau; Laurent Demany; Bernard Meyer; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Enhancing Chinese tone recognition by manipulating amplitude envelope: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Christopher Turner; Jacob Oleson; Xuyang Zhang; Bruce Gantz; Rebecca Froman; Carol Olszewski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies.

Authors:  W J Dowling; D S Fujitani
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Is relative pitch specific to pitch?

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

9.  Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicity, and number of electrodes.

Authors:  Sonya Singh; Ying-Yee Kong; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Melodic interval perception by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Megan E Masterson; Ching-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interaction Between Pitch and Timbre Perception in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Samara Soslowsky; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-30

3.  High Oxygen Exchange to Music Indicates Auditory Distractibility in Acquired Brain Injury: An fNIRS Study with a Vector-Based Phase Analysis.

Authors:  Eunju Jeong; Hokyoung Ryu; Joon-Ho Shin; Gyu Hyun Kwon; Geonsang Jo; Ji-Yeong Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Vibrotactile Stimulation Based on the Fundamental Frequency Can Improve Melodic Contour Identification of Normal-Hearing Listeners With a 4-Channel Cochlear Implant Simulation.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Lauren Hayes
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Agathe Pralus; Ruben Hermann; Fanny Cholvy; Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Annie Moulin; Pascal Barone; Nicolas Grimault; Eric Truy; Barbara Tillmann; Anne Caclin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Melodic Contour Identification Reflects the Cognitive Threshold of Aging.

Authors:  Eunju Jeong; Hokyoung Ryu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.