Literature DB >> 20674733

What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.

Marion Cousineau1, Laurent Demany, Bernard Meyer, Daniel Pressnitzer.   

Abstract

Pitch perception has been extensively studied using discrimination tasks on pairs of single sounds. When comparing pitch discrimination performance for normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear implant (CI) listeners, it usually appears that CI users have relatively poor pitch discrimination. Tasks involving pitch sequences, such as melody perception or auditory scene analysis, are also usually difficult for CI users. However, it is unclear whether the issue with pitch sequences is a consequence of sound discriminability, or if an impairment exists for sequence processing per se. Here, we compared sequence processing abilities across stimulus dimensions (fundamental frequency and intensity) and listener groups (NH, CI, and NH listeners presented with noise-vocoded sequences). The sequence elements were firstly matched in discriminability, for each listener and dimension. Participants were then presented with pairs of sequences, constituted by up to four elements varying on a single dimension, and they performed a same/different task. In agreement with a previous study (Cousineau et al., 2009) fundamental frequency sequences were processed more accurately than intensity sequences by NH listeners. However, this was not the case for CI listeners, nor for NH listeners presented with noise-vocoded sequences. Intensity sequence processing was, nonetheless, equally accurate in the three groups. These results show that the reduced pitch cues received by CI listeners do not only elevate thresholds, as previously documented, but also affect pitch sequence processing above threshold. We suggest that efficient sequence processing for pitch requires the resolution of individual harmonics in the auditory periphery, which is not achieved with the current generation of implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674733     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  5 in total

1.  Contour identification with pitch and loudness cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Megan E Masterson; Ching-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Child implant users' imitation of happy- and sad-sounding speech.

Authors:  David J Wang; Sandra E Trehub; Anna Volkova; Pascal van Lieshout
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-21

3.  Pleasantness Ratings for Harmonic Intervals With Acoustic and Electric Hearing in Unilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Emily R Spitzer; David M Landsberger; David R Friedmann; John J Galvin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  What is a melody? On the relationship between pitch and brightness of timbre.

Authors:  Marion Cousineau; Samuele Carcagno; Laurent Demany; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-17

5.  A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Attentive Music Listening on Cochlear Implant Users' Speech Perception, Quality of Life, and Behavioral and Objective Measures of Frequency Change Detection.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Firestone; Kelli McGuire; Chun Liang; Nanhua Zhang; Chelsea M Blankenship; Jing Xiang; Fawen Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.