Literature DB >> 10464944

Dynamic frequency change influences loudness perception: a central, analytic process.

J G Neuhoff1, M K McBeath, W C Wanzie.   

Abstract

Three experiments showed that dynamic frequency change influenced loudness. Listeners heard tones that had concurrent frequency and intensity change and tracked loudness while ignoring pitch. Dynamic frequency change significantly influenced loudness. A control experiment showed that the effect depended on dynamic change and was opposite that predicted by static equal loudness contours. In a 3rd experiment, listeners heard white noise intensity change in one ear and harmonic frequency change in the other and tracked the loudness of the noise while ignoring the harmonic tone. Findings suggest that the dynamic interaction of pitch and loudness occurs centrally in the auditory system; is an analytic process; has evolved to take advantage of naturally occurring covariation of frequency and intensity; and reflects a shortcoming of traditional static models of loudness perception in a dynamic natural setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10464944     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

1.  The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change.

Authors:  Michael K McBeath; John G Neuhoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

2.  Examining auditory kappa effects through manipulating intensity differences between sequential tones.

Authors:  Doug Alards-Tomalin; Launa C Leboe-McGowan; Todd A Mondor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-27

3.  Interaction Between Pitch and Timbre Perception in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Samara Soslowsky; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-30

4.  Contour identification with pitch and loudness cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Megan E Masterson; Ching-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Phantoms in the brain: ambiguous representations of stimulus amplitude and timing in weakly electric fish.

Authors:  Bruce A Carlson
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2008-11-01

6.  Is relative pitch specific to pitch?

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

7.  Perception of visual apparent motion is modulated by a gap within concurrent auditory glides, even when it is illusory.

Authors:  Qingcui Wang; Lu Guo; Ming Bao; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-19

8.  Musical expertise and the ability to imagine loudness.

Authors:  Laura Bishop; Freya Bailes; Roger T Dean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.