Literature DB >> 15775923

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.

M Sevimay1, F Turhan, M A Kiliçarslan, G Eskitascioglu.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Primary implant stability and bone density are variables that are considered essential to achieve predictable osseointegration and long-term clinical survival of implants. Information about the influence of bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown is limited.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of 4 different bone qualities on stress distribution in an implant-supported mandibular crown, using 3-dimensional (3-D) finite element (FE) analysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 3-D FE model of a mandibular section of bone with a missing second premolar tooth was developed, and an implant to receive a crown was developed. A solid 4.1 x 10-mm screw-type dental implant system (ITI; solid implant) and a metal-ceramic crown using Co-Cr (Wiron 99) and feldspathic porcelain were modeled. The model was developed with FE software (Pro/Engineer 2000i program), and 4 types of bone quality (D1, D2, D3, and D4) were prepared. A load of 300 N was applied in a vertical direction to the buccal cusp and distal fossa of the crowns. Optimal bone quality for an implant-supported crown was evaluated.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated that von Mises stresses in D3 and D4 bone quality were 163 MPa and 180 MPa, respectively, and reached the highest values at the neck of the implant. The von Mises stress values in D1 and D2 bone quality were 150 MPa and 152 MPa, respectively, at the neck of the implant. A more homogenous stress distribution was seen in the entire bone. Conclusion For the bone qualities investigated, stress concentrations in compact bone followed the same distributions as in the D3 bone model, but because the trabecular bone was weaker and less resistant to deformation than the other bone qualities modeled, the stress magnitudes were greatest for D3 and D4 bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15775923     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  39 in total

1.  Relation between insertion torque and bone-implant contact percentage: an artificial bone study.

Authors:  Cheng Liu; Ming-Tzu Tsai; Heng-Li Huang; Michael Yuan-Chien Chen; Jui-Ting Hsu; Kuo-Chih Su; Chih-Han Chang; Aaron Yu-Jen Wu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of proximal contact strength on the three-dimensional displacements of implant-supported cantilever fixed partial dentures under axial loading.

Authors:  Zhen-zhen Peng; Xin-min Chen; Jun Wang; Ai-jie Li; Zu-jie Xu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Biomedical electrosurgery devices containing nanostructure for minimally invasive surgery: reduction of thermal injury and acceleration of wound healing for liver cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Tien Hsiao; Li-Hsiang Lin; Hsi-Jen Chiang; Keng-Liang Ou; Han-Yi Cheng
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  3D finite element analysis to detect stress distribution: spiral family implants.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Ilaria Zollino; Luigi Paracchini; Guidi Riccardo; Stefano Fanali; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2010-04-24

Review 5.  Digitization and its futuristic approach in prosthodontics.

Authors:  Ritika Bhambhani; Jayanta Bhattacharya; Saibal Kr Sen
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-10-07

6.  Evaluation of stress distribution in bone of different densities using different implant designs: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  K Premnath; J Sridevi; N Kalavathy; Prakash Nagaranjani; M Ranganath Sharmila
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-10-26

7.  Development of 3D CAD/FEM Analysis System for Natural Teeth and Jaw Bone Constructed from X-Ray CT Images.

Authors:  Aki Hasegawa; Akikazu Shinya; Yuji Nakasone; Lippo V J Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Akiyoshi Shinya
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2010-07-18

8.  An Evaluation of the Stress Distribution in Screw Retained Implants of Different Crown Implant Ratios in Different Bone Densities Under Various Loads-A FEM Study.

Authors:  Naveen Reddy Vootla; Sarat Chandra Barla; Vhc Kumar; Hemchand Surapaneni; Srilatha Balusu; Swetha Kalyanam
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01

Review 9.  Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Niklaus P Lang; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Parametric analysis of orthopedic screws in relation to bone density.

Authors:  Elisabetta M Zanetti; Massimiliano Salaorno; Giovanni Grasso; Alberto L Audenino
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2009-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.