Literature DB >> 16198176

Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review.

Jae-Hoon Lee1, Val Frias, Keun-Woo Lee, Robert F Wright.   

Abstract

Understanding and using biomechanical theories that effect endosseous implant design may improve the performance of implants in varying load conditions and allow the clinician to better apply this information with potentially improved success rates. The following article presents information from English peer-reviewed journals identified by a Medline search covering the years from 1974 through 2004, and attempts to integrate information available in the dental literature and address current controversies and issues in selecting diameter, length, and shapes of dental implants.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16198176     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  42 in total

Review 1.  Removal techniques for failed implants.

Authors:  A Bowkett; D Laverty; A Patel; L Addy
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Stress Distribution Around Single Short Dental Implants: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  S Vidya Bhat; Priyanka Premkumar; K Kamalakanth Shenoy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-09-10

3.  Evaluation of design parameters of dental implant shape, diameter and length on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  M Mohammed Ibrahim; C Thulasingam; K S G A Nasser; V Balaji; M Rajakumar; P Rupkumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-08-20

4.  Evaluation of stress distribution in bone of different densities using different implant designs: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  K Premnath; J Sridevi; N Kalavathy; Prakash Nagaranjani; M Ranganath Sharmila
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-10-26

5.  Radiographic Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants in Maxilla and Mandible: One Year Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Muhamed Ajanović; Adis Hamzić; Sead Redžepagić; Alma Kamber-Ćesir; Lejla Kazazić; Selma Tosum
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2015-06

6.  Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis.

Authors:  Dieter Busenlechner; Rudolf Fürhauser; Robert Haas; Georg Watzek; Georg Mailath; Bernhard Pommer
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Bioengineered periodontal tissue formed on titanium dental implants.

Authors:  Y Lin; G O Gallucci; D Buser; D Bosshardt; U C Belser; P C Yelick
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 8.  Is the shortened dental arch still a satisfactory option?

Authors:  M Manola; F Hussain; B J Millar
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  The application of locking-taper implants in posterior area implant restoration with insufficient occlusal-gingival distances.

Authors:  Guoxi Sun; Lei Cao; Haiying Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

10.  Implants and all-ceramic restorations in a patient treated for aggressive periodontitis: a case report.

Authors:  Jin-Sun Hong; In-Sung Yeo; Sung-Hun Kim; Jai-Bong Lee; Jung-Suk Han; Jae-Ho Yang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.