Literature DB >> 24431738

Evaluation of accuracy of direct transfer snapon impression coping closed tray impression technique and direct transfer open tray impression technique: an in vitro study.

T Balamurugan1, P Manimaran2.   

Abstract

Accuracy of the implant impression technique is one of the key factor determining the strain free fit of the prosthesis fabricated which influences the treatment success. Two implant impression techniques namely the closed tray technique with transfer coping and open tray technique were evaluated for accuracy with stone casts obtained from them. Casts were evaluated using a custom constructed bar on strain gage (SYSCOM) and abutment coordinates using Coordinate Measuring Machine (TESA micro-HITE). The statistical analysis with one way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney tests show that the casts obtained with open tray technique were accurate than the casts of closed tray technique (significance P < 0.001). Direct transfer impression technique with less number of components ensures the high accuracy of transfer of implant positions from master cast to the laboratory cast compared to the indirect transfer impression technique.

Keywords:  Closed tray impression technique with pick up transfer; Coordinate measuring machine; Implant impression technique accuracy; Open tray impression technique; Strain gage

Year:  2012        PMID: 24431738      PMCID: PMC3732721          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0141-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures.

Authors:  D Herbst; J C Nel; C H Driessen; P J Becker
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.

Authors:  Paolo Vigolo; Zeina Majzoub; Giampiero Cordioli
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions.

Authors:  R M Humphries; P Yaman; T J Bloem
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.

Authors:  A G Wee
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.

Authors:  Jason Burns; Richard Palmer; Leslie Howe; Ron Wilson
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.

Authors:  Heather J Conrad; Igor J Pesun; Ralph DeLong; James S Hodges
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model.

Authors:  A B Carr
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Accuracy of implant impression techniques.

Authors:  D Assif; B Marshak; A Schmidt
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques.

Authors:  S J Riedy; B R Lang; B E Lang
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.426

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Effect of technique and impression material on the vertical misfit of a screw-retained, three-unit implant bridge: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Hamidreza Rajati Haghi; Masoud Shiehzadeh; Mohammadreza Nakhaei; Fatemeh Ahrary; Saeid Sabzevari
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

2.  A Comparison of implant impression precision: Different materials and techniques.

Authors:  Mahtab Tabesh; Marzieh Alikhasi; Hakimeh Siadat
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-02-01

3.  Evaluation of positional accuracy in multiple implants using four different splinting materials: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Thara Maria Joseph; R Ravichandran; S Lylajam; Prasanth Viswabharan; Kavitha Janardhanan; Smitha Rajeev
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

4.  Need for a reliable alternative to custom-made Implant Impression trays: An in vitro study comparing accuracy of custom trays versus specialized aluminum stock tray.

Authors:  Mukti Goel; Pankaj Dhawan; Piyush Tandan; Pankaj Madhukar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

5.  Comparison of the accuracy of open-tray and snap-on impression techniques of implants with different angulations.

Authors:  Abbass Fallah Tafti; Mahnaz Hatami; Foroughsadat Razavi; Behnaz Ebadian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019-11-12

6.  A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant master casts fabricated from two different transfer impression techniques.

Authors:  Rupali Patil; Pankaj Kadam; Chetan Oswal; Seema Patil; Shweta Jajoo; Arati Gachake
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

7.  To evaluate and compare the accuracy of definitive casts using various splinting methods on implant level impressions in All-on-Four treatment: An in vitro study.

Authors:  S Daya Shankar; Santosh Doddamani
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-04-07

8.  The Accuracy of Open-Tray vs. Snap on Impression Techniques in A 6-Implant Model: An In Vitro 3D Study.

Authors:  Adi Arieli; Maram Adawi; Mahmoud Masri; Evgeny Weinberg; Ilan Beitlitum; Raphael Pilo; Shifra Levartovsky
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Dimensional accuracy of vinyl polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials in direct implant impression technique for multiple dental implants.

Authors:  Rohini Rajendran; N Gopi Chander; Kuttae Vishwanathan Anitha; Balasubramanian Muthukumar
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2021-05-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.