Literature DB >> 8666454

Accuracy of implant impression techniques.

D Assif1, B Marshak, A Schmidt.   

Abstract

Three impression techniques were assessed for accuracy in a laboratory cast that simulated clinical practice. The first technique used autopolymerizing acrylic resin to splint the transfer copings. The second involved splinting of the transfer copings directly to an acrylic resin custom tray. In the third, only impression material was used to orient the transfer copings. The accuracy of stone casts with implant analogs was measured against a master framework. The fit of the framework on the casts was tested using strain gauges. The technique using acrylic resin to splint transfer copings in the impression material was significantly more accurate than the two other techniques. Stresses observed in the framework are described and discussed with suggestions to improve clinical and laboratory techniques.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8666454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Jan-Frederik Güth; Arndt Happe; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Modification of Fixture Mount to be Used as an Impression Coping in Closely Placed Implants.

Authors:  Sudhindra Mahoorkar; Anoop Jain; Cauvery K; Pawan Kumar; Raghavendra Havale
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-04-15

Review 3.  Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Muaiyed Mahmoud Buzayan; Norsiah Binti Yunus
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-28

4.  Evaluation of accuracy of direct transfer snapon impression coping closed tray impression technique and direct transfer open tray impression technique: an in vitro study.

Authors:  T Balamurugan; P Manimaran
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-08-19

5.  Accuracy of a proposed implant impression technique using abutments and metal framework.

Authors:  Hyeok-Jae Lee; Young-Jun Lim; Chang-Whe Kim; Jung-Han Choi; Myung-Joo Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Implant-supported fixed hybrid acrylic complete dentures opposing fully restored mandibular metal ceramic restorations.

Authors:  Mohammed A Alfarsi; Sharaz Shaik
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-26

7.  Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods.

Authors:  Sang-Jik Lee; Sung-Bum Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  An implant-supported removable partial denture for a patient with post-inflammatory scar contracture caused by burn complications: a clinical report.

Authors:  Jee-Hwan Kim; Jae-Hoon Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  In vitro evaluation of the precision of working casts for implant-supported restoration with multiple abutments.

Authors:  Anderson Almeida Castilho; Alberto Noriyuki Kojima; Sarina Maciel Braga Pereira; Diego Klee de Vasconcellos; Marcos Koiti Itinoche; Renata Faria; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy between Open-Tray and Closed-Tray Implant Impression Technique in 15° Angled Implants.

Authors:  F Balouch; E Jalalian; M Nikkheslat; R Ghavamian; Sh Toopchi; F Jallalian; S Jalalian
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.