Literature DB >> 2094651

The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions.

R M Humphries1, P Yaman, T J Bloem.   

Abstract

The accuracy of master casts fabricated from three impression techniques commonly used with the Brånemark System was measured. Points placed in a metal surrogate model and onto master abutments were compared after abutments were transferred to stone casts using splinted and unsplinted impression coping techniques. The mean values and standard deviations of each of the reference points on 12 total casts were compared with the values for each point from the surrogate model. Values from techniques using splinted and unsplinted squared polymer copings as well as unsplinted tapered hydrocolloid copings were not significantly different from values recorded from the master surrogate model. Tapered hydrocolloid copings yielded a higher correlation to coordinate values on the master than unsplinted squared polymer copings or splinted squared copings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2094651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Jan-Frederik Güth; Arndt Happe; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Muaiyed Mahmoud Buzayan; Norsiah Binti Yunus
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-28

3.  Evaluation of accuracy of direct transfer snapon impression coping closed tray impression technique and direct transfer open tray impression technique: an in vitro study.

Authors:  T Balamurugan; P Manimaran
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-08-19

4.  Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.

Authors:  Maria Menini; Paolo Setti; Francesco Pera; Paolo Pera; Paolo Pesce
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Accuracy of a proposed implant impression technique using abutments and metal framework.

Authors:  Hyeok-Jae Lee; Young-Jun Lim; Chang-Whe Kim; Jung-Han Choi; Myung-Joo Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Arndt Happe; Markus Schlee; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods.

Authors:  Sang-Jik Lee; Sung-Bum Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Mansor Rismanchian; Badrosadat Dastgheib; Farshad Bajoghli
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

9.  Three-dimensional accuracy of different correction methods for cast implant bars.

Authors:  Ji-Yung Kwon; Chang-Whe Kim; Young-Jun Lim; Ho-Beom Kwon; Myung-Joo Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy between Open-Tray and Closed-Tray Implant Impression Technique in 15° Angled Implants.

Authors:  F Balouch; E Jalalian; M Nikkheslat; R Ghavamian; Sh Toopchi; F Jallalian; S Jalalian
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.