Literature DB >> 24421969

BPrevention of Cutaneous Tissue Contracture During Removal of Craniofacial Implant Superstructures for CT and MRI Studies.

Maureen Sullivan1, Rachael Rossitto1, David Casey1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Head and neck cancer patients who have lost facial parts following surgical intervention frequently require craniofacial implant retained facial prostheses for restoration. Many craniofacial implant patients require computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans as part of their long-term follow-up care. Consequently removal of implant superstructures and peri-abutment tissue management is required for those studies. The purpose of the present paper was to describe a method for eliminating cranial imaging artifacts in patients with craniofacial implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three patients wearing extraoral implant retained facial prostheses needing either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging studies were discussed. Peri-implant soft tissues contracture after removal of percutaneous craniofacial implant abutments during computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies was prevented using a method proposed by authors. The procedure involves temporary removal of the supra-implant components prior to imaging and filling of the tissue openings with polyvinyl siloxane dental impression material.
RESULTS: Immediately after filling of the tissue openings with polyvinyl siloxane dental impression material patients were sent for the imaging studies, and were asked to return for removal of the silicone plugs and reconnection of all superstructure hardware after imaging procedures were complete. The silicone plugs were easily removed with a dental explorer. The percutaneous abutments were immediately replaced and screwed into the implants which were at the bone level.
CONCLUSIONS: Presented herein method eliminates the source of artifacts and prevents contracture of percutaneous tissues upon removal of the implant abutments during imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray computed tomography; artifacts.; endosseous implantation; magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2010        PMID: 24421969      PMCID: PMC3886049          DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2010.1204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res        ISSN: 2029-283X


  18 in total

1.  Analysis of titanium induced CT artifacts in the development of biomechanical finite element models.

Authors:  C Zannoni; M Viceconti; L Pierotti; A Cappello
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Effects of titanium prosthesis, offset and size of field of view on bone mineral density measurements using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Z Feng; I Ziv; J Rho; S Han; Z Fishkin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla.

Authors:  F G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  [Artifacts in MRT caused by instruments and implants].

Authors:  Hansjörg Graf; Ulrike A Lauer; Thomas Klemm; Ludger Schnieder; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.820

5.  RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hansjörg Graf; Ulrike A Lauer; Alexander Berger; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Safety of orthopedic implants in magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental verification.

Authors:  Ritabh Kumar; Richard A Lerski; Stephen Gandy; Benedict A Clift; Rami J Abboud
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with dental implants: a clinical report.

Authors:  C Devge; A Tjellström; H Nellström
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies.

Authors:  P I Brånemark; R Adell; U Breine; B O Hansson; J Lindström; A Ohlsson
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1969

9.  CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique.

Authors:  T M Link; W Berning; S Scherf; U Joosten; A Joist; K Engelke; H E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials: comparison of 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic fields.

Authors:  Hideki Matsuura; Takashi Inoue; Kuniaki Ogasawara; Makoto Sasaki; Hiromu Konno; Yasutaka Kuzu; Hideaki Nishimoto; Akira Ogawa
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.