Literature DB >> 16127256

Quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials: comparison of 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic fields.

Hideki Matsuura1, Takashi Inoue, Kuniaki Ogasawara, Makoto Sasaki, Hiromu Konno, Yasutaka Kuzu, Hideaki Nishimoto, Akira Ogawa.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is an important diagnostic tool for neurosurgical diseases but susceptibility artifacts caused by biomaterial instrumentation frequently causes difficulty in visualizing postoperative changes. The susceptibility artifacts caused by neurosurgical biomaterials were compared quantitatively by 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla MR imaging. MR imaging of uniform size and shape of pieces ceramic (zirconia), pure titanium, titanium alloy, and cobalt-based alloy was performed at 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla. A linear region of interest was defined across the center of the biomaterial in the transverse direction, and the susceptibility artifact diameter was calculated. Susceptibility artifacts developed around all biomaterials at all magnetic field strengths. The artifact diameters caused by pure titanium, titanium alloy, and cobalt-based alloy increased in the order of 0.5, 1.5, to 3.0 Tesla magnetic fields. The artifact diameter of ceramic was not influenced by magnetic field strength, and was the smallest of all biomaterials at all magnetic field strengths. The artifacts caused by biomaterials except ceramic increase with the magnetic field strength. Ceramic instrumentation will minimize artifacts in all magnetic fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16127256     DOI: 10.2176/nmc.45.395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)        ISSN: 0470-8105            Impact factor:   1.742


  9 in total

1.  Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations.

Authors:  A R G Cortes; R Abdala-Junior; M Weber; E S Arita; J L Ackerman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Usefulness of metal artifact reduction with WARP technique at 1.5 and 3T MRI in imaging metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik; Stefan Landgraeber; Patrick Schulte; Oliver Kraff; Thomas C Lauenstein; Jens M Theysohn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Blankenstein; B T Truong; A Thomas; N Thieme; C Zachriat
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 4.  Research and development of metals for medical devices based on clinical needs.

Authors:  Takao Hanawa
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 8.090

5.  BPrevention of Cutaneous Tissue Contracture During Removal of Craniofacial Implant Superstructures for CT and MRI Studies.

Authors:  Maureen Sullivan; Rachael Rossitto; David Casey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2010-07-01

6.  Susceptibility artifacts induced by crowns of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xiaomeng Gao; Qianbing Wan; Qingping Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Development and evaluation of a numerical simulation approach to predict metal artifacts from passive implants in MRI.

Authors:  Tobias Spronk; Oliver Kraff; Jakob Kreutner; Gregor Schaefers; Harald H Quick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 2.533

8.  Reliability of slice-encoding for metal artefact correction (SEMAC) MRI to identify prosthesis loosening in patients with painful total hip arthroplasty - a single centre, prospective, surgical validation study.

Authors:  Tsuneari Takahashi; Siddharth Thaker; Giovanni Lettieri; Anthony Redmond; Michael R Backhouse; Martin Stone; Hemant Pandit; Philip O'Connor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Design and development of novel MRI compatible zirconium- ruthenium alloys with ultralow magnetic susceptibility.

Authors:  H F Li; F Y Zhou; L Li; Y F Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.