Literature DB >> 11536406

Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla.

F G Shellock1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use ex vivo testing to determine the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety aspects for seven different metallic neurosurgical implants in association with the 1.5-T MR environment. Ex vivo testing was performed using previously-described techniques for the evaluation of magnetic field interactions (deflection angle and torque), heating (gel-filled phantom and fluoroptic thermometry; 15 minutes of MRI at a specific absorption rate [SAR] of 1.4 W/kg), and artifacts (using T1-weighted, spin-echo and gradient-echo pulse sequences). None of the metallic implants displayed interactions with the magnetic field. The highest temperature change was +0.6 degrees C for the representative implant that was evaluated. Artifacts were relatively minor. The lack of magnetic field interactions and negligible heating indicate that MR procedures may be conducted safely in patients with these neurosurgical implants using MR systems with static magnetic fields of 1.5-T or less. Furthermore, these implants may be considered for use in interventional MR procedures insofar as the MR safe qualities and relatively small artifacts would likely be desirable for such procedures. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11536406     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  12 in total

1.  Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Glenn R Meininger; E Rene Rodrigues; Timm M Dickfeld; David A Bluemke; Albert Lardo; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Radiofrequency heating and magnetically induced displacement of dental magnetic attachments during 3.0 T MRI.

Authors:  K Miyata; M Hasegawa; Y Abe; T Tabuchi; T Namiki; T Ishigami
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  The influence of 1.5 and 3 T magnetic resonance unit magnetic fields on the movement of steel-jacketed projectiles in ordnance gelatin.

Authors:  Sebastian Eggert; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Martin Lory; John M Froehlich; Dominic Gascho; Michael J Thali; Stephan A Bolliger
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  The Contribution of Common Surgically Implanted Hardware to Functional MR Imaging Artifacts.

Authors:  A A Desai; M K Strother; C C Faraco; V L Morgan; T R Ladner; L M Dethrage; L C Jordan; M J Donahue
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Radiofrequency-induced heating near fixed orthodontic appliances in high field MRI systems at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Marc Regier; Jörn Kemper; Michael G Kaul; Markus Feddersen; Gerhard Adam; Bärbel Kahl-Nieke; Arndt Klocke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Magnetization and demagnetization of magnetic dental attachments in a 3-T MRI system.

Authors:  Norio Hayashi; Akio Ogura; Toshio Tsuchihashi; Daisuke Takahashi; Tsuyoshi Matsuda; Shinya Seino; Tsukasa Doi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-04-27

7.  Movement of steel-jacketed projectiles in biological tissue in the magnetic field of a 3-T magnetic resonance unit.

Authors:  Stephan A Bolliger; Michael J Thali; Dominic Gascho; Sebastian A Poschmann; Sebastian Eggert
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Radiofrequency heating of metallic dental devices during 3.0 T MRI.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; K Miyata; Y Abe; T Ishigami
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  BPrevention of Cutaneous Tissue Contracture During Removal of Craniofacial Implant Superstructures for CT and MRI Studies.

Authors:  Maureen Sullivan; Rachael Rossitto; David Casey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2010-07-01

10.  The Efficacy of Titanium Burr Hole Cover for Reconstruction of Skull Defect after Burr Hole Trephination of Chronic Subdural Hematoma.

Authors:  Tae-Seop Im; Yoon-Soo Lee; Sang-Jun Suh; Jeong-Ho Lee; Kee-Young Ryu; Dong-Gee Kang
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.