Literature DB >> 16838376

Safety of orthopedic implants in magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental verification.

Ritabh Kumar1, Richard A Lerski, Stephen Gandy, Benedict A Clift, Rami J Abboud.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an indispensable tool for musculoskeletal imaging. The presence of metal, however, raises concerns. The potential risks are loosening and migration of the implant, heating of the metal with surrounding tissue, causing thermal damage, and artifactual distortion which compromise the diagnostic value of the procedure. The aim of this study was to test experimentally the nature and extent of the first two of these effects in orthopedic implants. The degree of ferromagnetism was evaluated by deflection studies at the portals of a 0.25 Tesla permanent magnet and 1.0 Tesla clinical MRI scanner. None of the orthopedic implants exhibited any attraction. External fixator clamps, however, showed significant ferromagnetism. The heating of implants by "worst-case" scenario imaging sequences was insignificant. Many contemporary nonferromagnetic orthopedic implants can be imaged safely. It is prudent, however, to perform ex vivo deflection studies on a duplicate implant to confirm MR compatibility. With external fixator devices exhibiting strong ferromagnetism, MRI should be avoided. With expanding indications for MRI, orthopedic implants are unlikely to limit the potential of this powerful tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16838376     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

1.  The influence of 1.5 and 3 T magnetic resonance unit magnetic fields on the movement of steel-jacketed projectiles in ordnance gelatin.

Authors:  Sebastian Eggert; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Martin Lory; John M Froehlich; Dominic Gascho; Michael J Thali; Stephan A Bolliger
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  MRI evaluation of the knee with non-ferromagnetic external fixators: cadaveric knee model.

Authors:  Peter Elsissy; Yusuf T Akpolat; Alexander Chien; Wayne K Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-06-09

3.  Movement of steel-jacketed projectiles in biological tissue in the magnetic field of a 3-T magnetic resonance unit.

Authors:  Stephan A Bolliger; Michael J Thali; Dominic Gascho; Sebastian A Poschmann; Sebastian Eggert
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  Advances in imaging of vertebral and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andrew L Goldberg; Sharif M Kershah
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  BPrevention of Cutaneous Tissue Contracture During Removal of Craniofacial Implant Superstructures for CT and MRI Studies.

Authors:  Maureen Sullivan; Rachael Rossitto; David Casey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2010-07-01

6.  Numerical investigations of MRI RF field induced heating for external fixation devices.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Jianxiang Shen; Wolfgang Kainz; Songsong Qian; Wen Wu; Ji Chen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Compatibility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with orthopedic implants: manufacturer questionnaires.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Iwatsuki; Hidemasa Yoneda; Tetsuro Onishi; Hisao Ishii; Shigeru Kurimoto; Michiro Yamamoto; Masahiro Tatebe; Hitoshi Hirata
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.131

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.