Manoj Sarma1, Peng Hu2, Stanislas Rapacchi2, Daniel Ennis2, Albert Thomas2, Percy Lee3, Patrick Kupelian3, Ke Sheng4. 1. Department of Radiological Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California. 2. Department of Radiological Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: ksheng@mednet.ucla.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate a low-rank decomposition method to reconstruct down-sampled k-space data for the purpose of tumor tracking. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seven retrospective lung cancer patients were included in the simulation study. The fully-sampled k-space data were first generated from existing 2-dimensional dynamic MR images and then down-sampled by 5 × -20 × before reconstruction using a Cartesian undersampling mask. Two methods, a low-rank decomposition method using combined dynamic MR images (k-t SLR based on sparsity and low-rank penalties) and a total variation (TV) method using individual dynamic MR frames, were used to reconstruct images. The tumor trajectories were derived on the basis of autosegmentation of the resultant images. To further test its feasibility, k-t SLR was used to reconstruct prospective data of a healthy subject. An undersampled balanced steady-state free precession sequence with the same undersampling mask was used to acquire the imaging data. RESULTS: In the simulation study, higher imaging fidelity and low noise levels were achieved with the k-t SLR compared with TV. At 10 × undersampling, the k-t SLR method resulted in an average normalized mean square error <0.05, as opposed to 0.23 by using the TV reconstruction on individual frames. Less than 6% showed tracking errors >1 mm with 10 × down-sampling using k-t SLR, as opposed to 17% using TV. In the prospective study, k-t SLR substantially reduced reconstruction artifacts and retained anatomic details. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance reconstruction using k-t SLR on highly undersampled dynamic MR imaging data results in high image quality useful for tumor tracking. The k-t SLR was superior to TV by better exploiting the intrinsic anatomic coherence of the same patient. The feasibility of k-t SLR was demonstrated by prospective imaging acquisition and reconstruction.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a low-rank decomposition method to reconstruct down-sampled k-space data for the purpose of tumor tracking. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seven retrospective lung cancerpatients were included in the simulation study. The fully-sampled k-space data were first generated from existing 2-dimensional dynamic MR images and then down-sampled by 5 × -20 × before reconstruction using a Cartesian undersampling mask. Two methods, a low-rank decomposition method using combined dynamic MR images (k-t SLR based on sparsity and low-rank penalties) and a total variation (TV) method using individual dynamic MR frames, were used to reconstruct images. The tumor trajectories were derived on the basis of autosegmentation of the resultant images. To further test its feasibility, k-t SLR was used to reconstruct prospective data of a healthy subject. An undersampled balanced steady-state free precession sequence with the same undersampling mask was used to acquire the imaging data. RESULTS: In the simulation study, higher imaging fidelity and low noise levels were achieved with the k-t SLR compared with TV. At 10 × undersampling, the k-t SLR method resulted in an average normalized mean square error <0.05, as opposed to 0.23 by using the TV reconstruction on individual frames. Less than 6% showed tracking errors >1 mm with 10 × down-sampling using k-t SLR, as opposed to 17% using TV. In the prospective study, k-t SLR substantially reduced reconstruction artifacts and retained anatomic details. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance reconstruction using k-t SLR on highly undersampled dynamic MR imaging data results in high image quality useful for tumor tracking. The k-t SLR was superior to TV by better exploiting the intrinsic anatomic coherence of the same patient. The feasibility of k-t SLR was demonstrated by prospective imaging acquisition and reconstruction.
Authors: B W Raaymakers; J J W Lagendijk; J Overweg; J G M Kok; A J E Raaijmakers; E M Kerkhof; R W van der Put; I Meijsing; S P M Crijns; F Benedosso; M van Vulpen; C H W de Graaff; J Allen; K J Brown Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: B G Fallone; B Murray; S Rathee; T Stanescu; S Steciw; S Vidakovic; E Blosser; D Tymofichuk Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Jing Cai; Paul W Read; James M Larner; David R Jones; Stanley H Benedict; Ke Sheng Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Eugene Milshteyn; Cornelius von Morze; Galen D Reed; Hong Shang; Peter J Shin; Peder E Z Larson; Daniel B Vigneron Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2018-03-11 Impact factor: 2.734