Atul Tyagi1, Sanjay S Supe2, Man P Singh3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, BLK Memorial Hospital, New Delhi, India ; Department of Physics, MMH College, Ghaziabad, UP, India. 2. Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 3. Department of Physics, MMH College, Ghaziabad, UP, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is being used to treat carcinoma of cervix (Ca Cx). Integral dose to normal tissue and increased leakage are the concern about IMRT. 6 MV photon beam is a good choice of energy for Ca Cx IMRT treatment. AIM: The objective of this study was to compare intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans generated by 6 MV and 15 MV photon energies for carcinoma of cervix (Ca Cx) with regards to dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index at 98% level (CI 98%), integral dose to normal tissue (NTID) and total number of monitor units (MUs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 16 patients was selected for this study. All patients were to receive a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. IMRT plans were generated for both energies using same dose-volume constraints. RESULTS: Our results show a comparable coverage of planning target volume (PTV) for both energies. Volume of PTV receiving a prescription dose is 97.8 ± 0.5% and 98.8 ± 0.4% for the 6 MV and the 15 MV plans. Volume of PTV receiving a dose of 107% is 4.4 ± 7.8% and 16.1 ± 22.2%. Bladder and rectum mean doses for the 6 MV and the 15 MV photon plans were 39.8 ± 3.0 Gy and 40.0 ± 3.2 Gy, and 35.8 ± 3.1 Gy and 36.0 ± 3.1 Gy, respectively. Homogeneity index (HI) for both energies was 1.04. The conformity indices at 98% isodose (CI 98%) were 1.3 ± 0.1 and 1.4 ± 0.1 for 6 MV and 15 MV photon plans, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a 6 MV photon is a good choice for Ca Cx IMRT as it produces a highly conformal, homogeneous plan with superior target coverage and better OAR sparing.
BACKGROUND: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is being used to treat carcinoma of cervix (Ca Cx). Integral dose to normal tissue and increased leakage are the concern about IMRT. 6 MV photon beam is a good choice of energy for Ca Cx IMRT treatment. AIM: The objective of this study was to compare intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans generated by 6 MV and 15 MV photon energies for carcinoma of cervix (Ca Cx) with regards to dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index at 98% level (CI 98%), integral dose to normal tissue (NTID) and total number of monitor units (MUs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 16 patients was selected for this study. All patients were to receive a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. IMRT plans were generated for both energies using same dose-volume constraints. RESULTS: Our results show a comparable coverage of planning target volume (PTV) for both energies. Volume of PTV receiving a prescription dose is 97.8 ± 0.5% and 98.8 ± 0.4% for the 6 MV and the 15 MV plans. Volume of PTV receiving a dose of 107% is 4.4 ± 7.8% and 16.1 ± 22.2%. Bladder and rectum mean doses for the 6 MV and the 15 MV photon plans were 39.8 ± 3.0 Gy and 40.0 ± 3.2 Gy, and 35.8 ± 3.1 Gy and 36.0 ± 3.1 Gy, respectively. Homogeneity index (HI) for both energies was 1.04. The conformity indices at 98% isodose (CI 98%) were 1.3 ± 0.1 and 1.4 ± 0.1 for 6 MV and 15 MV photon plans, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a 6 MV photon is a good choice for Ca Cx IMRT as it produces a highly conformal, homogeneous plan with superior target coverage and better OAR sparing.
Entities:
Keywords:
Carcinoma cervix; Conformity index; IMRT; Integral dose; Photon energy
Authors: Arno J Mundt; Anthony E Lujan; Jacob Rotmensch; Steven E Waggoner; S Diane Yamada; Gini Fleming; John C Roeske Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J C Roeske; A Lujan; J Rotmensch; S E Waggoner; D Yamada; A J Mundt Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Krzysztof Ślosarek; Wojciech Osewski; Aleksandra Grządziel; Michał Radwan; Łukasz Dolla; Marta Szlag; Małgorzata Stąpór-Fudzińska Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2014-11-18