Sophie Bonnet1, Julien Dekaezemacker1, Kendra A Turk-Kubo2, Thierry Moutin1, Robert M Hamersley3, Olivier Grosso1, Jonathan P Zehr2, Douglas G Capone4. 1. Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Aix Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Marseille/Noumea, New Caledonia, France. 2. Department of Ocean Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America. 3. Environmental Studies, Soka University of America, Aliso Viejo, California, United States of America. 4. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Abstract
We examined rates of N2 fixation from the surface to 2000 m depth in the Eastern Tropical South Pacific (ETSP) during El Niño (2010) and La Niña (2011). Replicated vertical profiles performed under oxygen-free conditions show that N2 fixation takes place both in euphotic and aphotic waters, with rates reaching 155 to 509 µmol N m(-2) d(-1) in 2010 and 24±14 to 118±87 µmol N m(-2) d(-1) in 2011. In the aphotic layers, volumetric N2 fixation rates were relatively low (<1.00 nmol N L(-1) d(-1)), but when integrated over the whole aphotic layer, they accounted for 87-90% of total rates (euphotic+aphotic) for the two cruises. Phylogenetic studies performed in microcosms experiments confirm the presence of diazotrophs in the deep waters of the Oxygen Minimum Zone (OMZ), which were comprised of non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs affiliated with nifH clusters 1K (predominantly comprised of α-proteobacteria), 1G (predominantly comprised of γ-proteobacteria), and 3 (sulfate reducing genera of the δ-proteobacteria and Clostridium spp., Vibrio spp.). Organic and inorganic nutrient addition bioassays revealed that amino acids significantly stimulated N2 fixation in the core of the OMZ at all stations tested and as did simple carbohydrates at stations located nearest the coast of Peru/Chile. The episodic supply of these substrates from upper layers are hypothesized to explain the observed variability of N2 fixation in the ETSP.
We examined rates of N2 fixation from the surface to 2000 m depth in the Eastern Tropical South Pacific (ETSP) during El Niño (2010) and La Niña (2011). Replicated vertical profiles performed under oxygen-free conditions show that N2 fixation takes place both in euphotic and aphotic waters, with rates reaching 155 to 509 µmol N m(-2) d(-1) in 2010 and 24±14 to 118±87 µmol N m(-2) d(-1) in 2011. In the aphotic layers, volumetricN2 fixation rates were relatively low (<1.00 nmol N L(-1) d(-1)), but when integrated over the whole aphotic layer, they accounted for 87-90% of total rates (euphotic+aphotic) for the two cruises. Phylogenetic studies performed in microcosms experiments confirm the presence of diazotrophs in the deep waters of the Oxygen Minimum Zone (OMZ), which were comprised of non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs affiliated with nifH clusters 1K (predominantly comprised of α-proteobacteria), 1G (predominantly comprised of γ-proteobacteria), and 3 (sulfate reducing genera of the δ-proteobacteria and Clostridium spp., Vibrio spp.). Organic and inorganic nutrient addition bioassays revealed that amino acids significantly stimulated N2 fixation in the core of the OMZ at all stations tested and as did simplecarbohydrates at stations located nearest the coast of Peru/Chile. The episodic supply of these substrates from upper layers are hypothesized to explain the observed variability of N2 fixation in the ETSP.
The efficiency of oceaniccarbon (C) sequestration depends upon many factors, among which is the availability of nutrients to support phytoplankton growth in the illuminated surface ocean. In particular, large amounts of nitrogen (N) are required, as it is an essential component of proteins, nucleic acids and other cellular constituents. Dissolved N in the form of nitrate (NO3
−) or ammonium (NH4
+) is directly usable for growth, but concentrations of fixed N are low (<1 µmol L−1) and often growth-limiting in most of the open ocean euphotic zone [1]. Dinitrogen (N2) gas dissolved in seawater, on the other hand, is very abundant in the euphotic zone (ca. 450 µmol L−1) and could constitute a nearly inexhaustible N source for the marine biota. However, only certain prokaryotic ‘N2-fixers’ (or diazotrophs) are able to use this N source since they can break the triple bond between the two N atoms of the N2 molecule, and convert it into a usable form (i.e. NH3) for assimilation.The focus of much recent marine N2 fixation research has been on the NO3
−-poor environments of the surface tropical ocean, where it may sustain up to 50% of ‘new’ primary production [2], [3]. The filamentous cyanobacterium Trichodesmium spp., which is widespread in the tropical ocean and has a macroscopic growth form [4], may fix from 60 [5] to 80 Tg of N per year [6]. Until the last decade, this organism was the focus of the bulk of research as it is conspicuous and easily collected [4]. However, since then, studies of the abundance and diversity of the nifH gene required for N2 fixation have elucidated the importance of unicellular pico- and nano-planktoniccyanobacteria [7], [8], extending the geographical extent of diazotrophy beyond tropical waters [9], and potentially narrowing the gap between direct measurements and geochemically-based global marine N fixation rates [5]. These molecular tools have also revealed the presence of putative non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs (possessing and potentially expressing the nifH gene) in diverse aquatic environments [10], including surface seawater, hydrothermal vents and lakes [11] and references therein). In marine waters, these diazotrophs seem to be almost ubiquitous [12], but few studies e.g. [13], [14] have focused on these non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs, and our knowledge of their distribution in the ocean and their biogeochemical importance for the marine N budget is still very limited.The N budget for the global ocean is poorly constrained, with some suggestions that sinks (denitrification and anammox) exceed sources (N2 fixation) [15]. The high energy and iron (Fe) requirements [16], [17] of the N2 fixation reaction have implied that this process occurs mainly in the large oligotrophic areas of the ocean that are depleted in fixed N, and where fixing N2 gives an ecological advantage. This may be particularly the case in areas which receive high Fe-rich Saharan dust such as the North Atlantic [18], or which are under the influence of terrigenous and submarine Fe sources, such as the North Pacific near Hawaii [19], [20] or the South West Pacific [20], [21], [22], [23]. However, recent studies [24], [25] have hypothesized that N2 fixation might also be associated with denitrified surface waters over oxygen minimum zones (OMZs), which have measureable NO3
−, but are depleted in N relative to phosphorus (P). This hypothesis has been recently confirmed in the coastal surface waters of the Peruvian-Chilean upwelling [26], [27] as well as throughout the eastern tropical South Pacific Ocean (ETSP) [28], where depth-integrated rates over the upper watercolumn were comparable to those found in subtropical gyres. nifH sequences recovered from these areas within the upper 200 m of the ocean were mostly non-cyanobacterial and clustered with known heterotrophic sequences [26]. This led us to explore N2 fixation in the aphotic zone of the ETSP.Previous studies conducted in surface waters of the ETSP indicated that N2 fixation was highly variable in space and time, with depth-integrated rates varying from 10- to 30-fold between cruises performed at the same locations [26], [28]. Although the activities of heterotrophicdiazotrophs might potentially be contributing to this high temporal variability, very few studies have examined the regulation of N2 fixation by heterotrophic bacteria in marine waters. OrganicC availability has been hypothesized to control marine heterotrophicN2 fixation [29] as a consequence of the high energy requirements of the reaction, but, to our knowledge, the effect of organic molecules on heterotrophicN2 fixation has never been studied in OMZs.In this study, we investigated N2 fixation along a transect across the ETSP in 2010 and 2011 through temperature, oxygen and nutrient gradients. We quantified N2 fixation throughout the 0 to 2000 m depth range in order to evaluate its potential biogeochemical impact on the marine N budget, and we conducted aphotic nutrient addition bioassays in the core of the aphoticOMZ in order to investigate which nutrients might control N2 fixation in this environment. We also phylogenetically characterized the diazotrophscommunity composition in the core of the OMZ and how it responded to some of the nutrient amendments.
Methods
Our research was carried out during two cruises in the ETSP, aboard the R/V Atlantis in February and March 2010, and the R/V Melville in March and April 2011. Experiments were performed along a transect that began in northern Chile and ran west along 20°S, from the nutrient-rich waters at 82°W to the more oligotrophic and low-NO3
− waters at 100°W, and returned along 10°S (Fig. 1). No specific permissions were required for these locations/activities as both cruises took place in international waters. This study did not involve endangered or protected species. The coastal waters of this region of the ETSP are characterized by a permanent wind-driven upwelling of cool nutrient-replete water (Fig. 1), which supports high primary productivity and a persistent subsurface OMZ, where O2concentrations are low enough to induce the anaerobic processes of the Ncycle, such as denitrification and anammox [30], [31], [32]. These O2-deficient waters are carried by Eckman transport westward beyond the limit of our transect. The ETSP is subjected to the inter-annual climactic variability of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which modulates the strength of the upwelling. The 2010 cruise took place during an El Niño event (Multivariate ENSO index: 1.52) and the 2011 cruise during a La Niña event (Mutivariate ENSO index: −1.49) [NOAA Climate Diagnostics Center, Wolter and Timlin (1993, 1998); data from http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/enso/mei.table.html].
Figure 1
Location of stations superimposed upon seawater temperature at 75-m-depth.
(A) the 2010 cruise (R/V Atlantis), and (B) the 2011 cruise (R/V Melville). Station numbering are identical to that of 2 companion papers [28], [42]).
Location of stations superimposed upon seawater temperature at 75-m-depth.
(A) the 2010 cruise (R/V Atlantis), and (B) the 2011 cruise (R/V Melville). Station numbering are identical to that of 2 companion papers [28], [42]).
Hydrographic and nutrient measurements
Hydrographic and nutrient measurements were performed at 6 stations in 2010 and 7 stations in 2011 (Fig. 1). Vertical profiles of temperature, chlorophyll a, fluorescence and dissolved oxygen were obtained using a Seabird 911 plus CTD equipped with a model 43 oxygen sensor and a Wetlabs ECO-AFL/FL chlorophyll fluorometer. Oxygen values were calibrated by micro-Winkler [33]. Seawater samples were collected at selected depths using a rosette equipped with 24 12-L Niskin bottles. Samples for inorganic nutrient (NO3
− and PO4
3− concentrations) analyses were collected in acid-washed 20-mL plastic bottles. Nutrient concentrations were determined using standard colorimetric techniques [34] on a Bran Luebbe AA3 autoanalyzer. Detection limits for the procedures were 0.02 to 0.52 µmol L−1 for NOx [nitrite (NO2
−)+NO3
−] and 0.005 to 0.083 µmol L−1 for PO4
3−.
Vertical profiles of N2 fixation
Rates of N2 fixation were measured using the 15N2 tracer method [35]. Water samples were dispensed into acid-leached 4.5-L polycarbonate bottles. During the 2010 cruise, this work was exploratory and unreplicated (except for nutrient addition bioassays, see below) measurements were made at 12 to 14 depths between the surface and 2000 m at stations 1, 9 and 11. During the 2011 cruise, samples were collected at stations 1, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 11 in triplicates at 12 depths between the surface and 2000 m, with a specific focus on O2 gradients. Depths were chosen in order to sample the oxycline, at least 3 depths within the core of the OMZ, as well as an additional 3 within the second increasing oxygenconcentrations below the OMZ. Most of these depths were located in the aphotic zone.On both cruises, specificcare was taken to avoid O2contamination and to perform incubations under strict oxygen-free conditions as described in [36]. Briefly, before each profile, the 36 4.5-L bottles were filled with deionized water, then the deionized water was flushed with argon and finally filled with seawater via tubing into the bottom of the argon-filled bottles to minimize gas exchange. Bottles were then closed with septa and spiked with 3 mL 15N2 (99 atom % EURISO-TOP) via a gas-tight syringe. Each bottle was shaken 30 times to fragment the 15N2 bubble and facilitate its dissolution. Recent work has suggested that with this method, there may be incomplete equilibration of the added 15N2 gas bubble with the seawater sample, resulting in a dissolved 15N2 concentration in the sample that is lower than the equilibrium value assumed in the calculation of 15N2 fixation rates [37]. This may lead to a potential underestimate of N2 fixation rates [38], [39]. Therefore, the values given in the present study should be considered as minimum estimates (discussed below). Bottles were then incubated either in on-deck incubators at irradiances specific from the sampling depth using blue screening and cooled with circulating surface seawater (photic samples), or in dark rooms at 12°C or 5°C depending of the sampling depth. After incubation, the triplicate bottles from each depth were filtered onto precombusted (4 h at 450°C) 25-mm GF/F filters. Filters were stored at −20°C until the end of the cruise, then dried for 24 h at 60°C and stored dry until mass spectrometric analysis. During the 2011 cruise, an extra 4.5-L bottle was collected at each depth of the profile, spiked with 15N2 and immediately filtered in order to determine the initial background δ15N in the particulate organic N (PON) for calculations of N2 fixation rates. During the 2010 cruise, the value of δ15N in air (0.00366) was used as a reference value for these calculations, which may introduce a potential bias, except at Station 1 where 15N atom % of the PON at depth was available.
Nutrient addition bioassays in the core of the OMZ
Nutrient addition bioassays of N2 fixation were performed at one single depth in the core of the OMZ (based on O2-CTD profiles) at 3 stations (Stations 5, 7 and 11, between 140- and 450-m depth) during the 2010 cruise and at 6 stations (Stations 1, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 11, between 320- and 475-m depth-) during the 2011 cruise. All experiments were performed in triplicate and under strict oxygen-free conditions (using the argon flushing method described above) to avoid inhibition of N2 fixation by oxygen. Immediately after collection, bottles were capped with septa and amended with nutrients via syringes. During the 2010 cruise, at each of the 3 stations, triplicate bottles were left as unamended controls, and a second set of bottles was amended with glucose to obtain a final concentration of 10 µmol L−1. During the 2011 cruise, triplicate bottles were left as unamended controls, and a second set of triplicate bottles was amended with a mixture of three simplecarbohydrate substrates (39% glucose, 29% acetate and 32% pyruvate, final total concentration of 1 µmol carbohydrate L-1) to test the effect of a source of dissolved organicC (DOC) on N2 fixation. A third set was amended with a mixture of three amino acids as a source of both DOC and dissolved organic N (DON) (20% leucine, 23% glutamic acid and 56% alanine) to reach a final concentration of 1 µmol amino acids L−1. The proportion of each carbohydrate and amino-acid has been chosen in order to add the same quantity of organicC in the two treatments (4 µmol L−1). A fourth set was amended with ATP (source of dissolved organic P, DOP) to reach a final concentration of 1 nmol L−1, and a fifth set was amended with 8 µmol L−1 of NO3
− to test its potential inhibitory effect on heterotrophicN2 fixation. Bottles were then incubated in a dark cold room at 12°C for 24 h in order to leave enough time to induce any potential nutrient stimulation. After 24 h, all bottles were spiked with 15N2 as described above, and incubation was continued under the same conditions for an additional 24 h. At the end of each incubation, the three treatments and control replicates were filtered as described above in order to measure N2 fixation rates, and amplification of the nifH gene (2010 only). Samples were also collected from bottles sacrificed at time zero in order to quantify background NOx and PO4
3− concentrations at every station. NOxconcentrations were also measured just after the NO3
− additions in order to confirm the added concentrations at the beginning of the incubations (data not shown).
Mass spectrometric analyses
The isotopic enrichment of particulate N after the incubation of seawater with 15N2 was measured by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry of pelletized filters (Europa Integra-CN), calibrated every 10 samples using reference material (International Atomic Energy Agency [AIEA], Analytical Quality Control Services). The linearity of 15N atom % as a function of increasing sample PON mass was verified as detailed in [40] on both natural and 15N enriched material. This step is critical in ultra-oligotrophic environments or deep waters, where suspended PONconcentrations are low. 15N atom % was linear (Fisher test, p<0.01) between 0.20 and 39 µmol N, which is within the range of PON measured in all of our samples (0.27 to 4.91 µmole N depending on the station and depth).Detection and quantification limits for particulate N were calculated daily, as 3 times and 10 times the standard deviation of 15N analysis of blanks, respectively. Detection limits ranged from 0.10 to 0.17 µmole N, and quantification limits ranged from 0.13 to 0.26 µmole N, depending on the station. The 15N isotope enrichment of a sample was calculated using the 15N atom % excess over the 15N atom % in samples taken from the same station at time zero, which was determined on bottles filtered immediately after adding 15N2. We considered the results to be significant when 15N excess enrichments were greater than 3 times the standard deviation obtained with ten AIEA references (15N atom % >0.0005). The quantification limit of N2 fixation in this study was 0.01 nmol L−1 d−1. If only one of the 3 replicate measurements was quantifiable, the average of the 3 replicates was forced equal to zero, in order to provide minimum estimates of N2 fixation.In order to determine areal rates, N2 fixation measurements were trapezoidally depth-integrated from the summed products of the average of two adjacent rate measurements (including those equal to zero) with the depth interval between them. The standard deviation on the triplicates (2011 cruise) was also used for a trapezoidally depth-integration in order to obtain the standard deviation on integrated rates.
Statistical analysis
Controls and experimental nutrient treatments were compared using a 2-tailed non parametric Mann-Whitney mean comparison test (n = 3, α = 0.05, unpaired samples).
Phylogenetic characterization of diazotrophs
In order to characterize the potential diazotrophs present in the core of the OMZ that responded to the addition of glucose, nucleic acid samples were collected from triplicate bioassays during the 2010 cruise for amplification of the nifH gene. At T0 and at the termination of the experiment, bottles were immediately filtered as described in [41] onto 25-mm, 0.2-µm Supor filters (GE Osmotics, Minnetonka, MN), and immediately flash frozen in liquid N2. All filters were stored at −80°C thereafter.DNA samples were extracted using the Qiagen All Prep kit (Valencia, CA), according to manufacturer's guidelines, with modifications to include freeze-thaw and bead-beating steps to disrupt the cells [42]. The wash steps of this protocol were automated using a QIAcube (Qiagen). DNA extracts were stored at −20°C until use.Nested PCR amplification targeting a fragment of the nifH gene was carried out using degenerate primers nifH1-4 [43], [44] using the reaction and thermocycling conditions described in [42]. Amplicons were purified using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) and cloned using the TOPO TA Cloning Kit for Sequencing (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Purified recombinant plasmids containing partial nifH sequences were recovered from clones using the Montage Plasmid Miniprep96 Kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and sequenced using Sanger technology at the UC Berkeley DNA Sequencing Center. All DNA extractions and as PCR preparations were performed in a PCR-amplicon free facility at UCSC described in [42].Sequencher 5.1 sequence analysis software (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI) was used to remove vector contamination and low-quality reads from raw sequences. All resulting partial nifH sequences were imported into a curated nifH database (http://pmc.ucsc.edu/~wwwzehr/research/database/), translated into amino acid sequences, aligned to the existing hidden Markov model alignment using the Quick Align function, and nucleic acids were realigned to the aligned amino acids in the ARB software environment. Sequences generated from the nutrient addition bioassays were clustered at 97% nucleotide similarity using CD-HIT-EST [45]. Nucleic acid trees used the Jukes-Candor correction for branch length. Trees generated in ARB were exported into iTOL for the display of associated metadata. All partial nifH sequences recovered were submitted to Genbank under Accession numbers KF515738 - KF515848.
Results
Hydrographic and nutrient profiles
During both cruises, oceanographicconditions were consistent with active wind-driven upwelling off the coast of Northern Chile and Peru (Fig. 1), associated with a vertically and horizontally extensive OMZ (Fig. 2C and 3B). During the 2010 cruise (R/V Atlantis, El Niño), the zone of decreasing dissolved oxygen (oxycline) was located at ca. 70–100 m at stations 11 and 9, and suboxicconditions ([O2] <20 µmol kg−1
[46]) were reached at 125 m and 130 m respectively at these two stations. The suboxic zone expanded from 130–750 m at Station 11. During the 2011 cruise (Fig. 3B, R/V Melville, La Niña conditions), the oxycline was shallower (ca. 30–40 m) at stations 11 and 9 compared to 2010, and suboxicconditions were reached at 65 m at both stations. The suboxic zone expanded from 70–850 m at Station 11. On the southern transect (Stations 1, 3 and 5, Fig. 2D and 4B), the watercolumn was well oxygenated during both cruises (ca. 200 µmol kg−1) over the first 200 m, and O2concentrations decreased with depth to reach minimum values of ca. 80 µmol kg−1 at 300 m depth.
Figure 2
Horizontal and vertical distributions of hydrological and biogeochemical parameters during the 2010 cruise (R/V Atlantis).
(A, B) temperature, (C, D) dissolved oxygen, (E, F) chlorophyll fluorescence in the northern transect (left panels) and southern transect (right panels).
Figure 3
Horizontal and vertical distributions of hydrological and biogeochemical parameters during the 2011 cruise (R/V Melville) – Northern transect (10°S).
Horizontal and vertical distributions of hydrological and biogeochemical parameters during the 2011 cruise (R/V Melville) – Southern transect (20°S).
(A) temperature, (B) dissolved oxygen, (C) chlorophyll a fluorescence, (D) NO3
− concentrations, (E) PO4
3− concentrations, (F) Mean N2 fixation rates (n = 3).During the 2011 cruise, on the northern transect at Stations 7 and 9 (Fig. 3D), surface NOxconcentrations were ca. 6 µmol L−1, increased quickly with depth (nitraclineca. 50 m) to reach ca. 37 µmol L−1 in the core of the OMZ. Close to the coast (Station 11), the nitracline was shallower (ca. 25 m) than that of the oceanic stations, and NOxconcentrations increased quickly to reach concentrations of ca. 30–40 µmol L−1 in the core of the OMZ. On the southern transect (Fig. 4D), NOxconcentrations were ca. 0.10 µmol L−1 over the first 100 m of the watercolumn. The depth of the nitracline was 85 m and 130 m at Stations 1 and 5, respectively, and concentrations increased progressively to reach values of ca. 40 µmol L−1 below the oxygen minimum and down to 2000 m. PO4concentrations (Fig. 3E and 4E) followed the same trend as NOx in the northern transect, with surface concentrations of 0.40–0.60 µmol L−1 and a shallower phosphocline near the coast (Station 11) compared to open ocean stations. In the southern transect, surface PO4concentrations were lower compared to those of the northern transect (0.03–0.30 µmol L−1) and the phosphocline was located deeper (ca. 150 m).During both cruises, chorophyll a fluorescence (Fig. 2E–F, 3C, 4C) was highest at stations located along the northern transect. It was much lower in 2010 compared to 2011, especially at stations nearest the coast of Peru on the Northern transect.
Vertical profiles (0 to 2000 m) of N2 fixation
During the 2010 cruise, N2 fixation was detected in 34 of 40 samples representing all three stations (Fig. 5). The overall range of rates measured over the cruise was from the detection limit to 0.80 nmol L−1 d−1. The highest rates were measured in O2 deficient waters at the oxyclines or in the core of the OMZ (Fig. 5), and reached values up to 0.57 nmol L−1 d−1, 0.6 nmol L−1 d−1 and 0.53 nmol L−1 d−1 at Stations 1, 11 and 9, respectively. Below the OMZ, rates were always measurable and were at 1000 m depth 0.16 nmol L−1 d−1, 0.23 nmol L−1 d−1 and 0.06 nmol L−1 d−1 at these stations. Integrated rates over the 2000 m watercolumn were 155 µmol N m−2 d−1 at Station 1, 288 µmol N m−2 d−1 at Station 9, and 509 µmol N m−2 d−1 at Station 11 (Table 1). The average integrated rate over the cruise was 317 µmol N m−2 d−1. Integrated N2 fixation rates in the aphotic zone accounted for 73 to 99% of the rates measured over the entire watercolumn depending on the station. When considering all the stations, the average areal rate in the aphotic zone was 87% of the total rate over the entire watercolumn (Table 1).
Figure 5
Vertical profiles (0–2000 m) of N2 fixation rates (nmol L−1 d−1) during the 2010 cruise (R/V Atlantis).
Open circles: individual N2 fixation measurements at each depth. Black line: dissolved oxygen concentrations (µmol Kg−1) divided by 500 to fit on the same scale.
Table 1
Areal N2 fixation rates (µmol N m−2 d−1) calculated from measurements performed in the euphotic and aphotic zones during the 2010 and 2011 cruises.
Station
Total 0–2000 m (µmol N m−2 d−1)
Euphotic (µmol N m−2 d−1)
Aphotic (µmol N m−2 d−1)
2010
Station 9
288
49
239
Station 11
509
8
501
Station 1
155
71
84
Average
317
43 (13%)
275 (87%)
2011
Station 7
50±39
10±10
40±29
Station 9
101±79
09±04
92±74
Station 11
25±17
04±02
21±14
Station 5
24±14
05±05
19±09
Station 1
118±87
01±01
117±86
Average
64
06 (10%)
58 (90%)
Uncertainties are derived from the standard errors of triplicate measurements for the 2011 cruise.
Vertical profiles (0–2000 m) of N2 fixation rates (nmol L−1 d−1) during the 2010 cruise (R/V Atlantis).
Open circles: individual N2 fixation measurements at each depth. Black line: dissolved oxygenconcentrations (µmol Kg−1) divided by 500 to fit on the same scale.Uncertainties are derived from the standard errors of triplicate measurements for the 2011 cruise.During the 2011 cruise, N2 fixation rates were significantly greater than zero in 140 of the 216 measurements made (Fig. 3F, Fig. 6). The overall range of rates measured was from detection limit to 0.26±0.12 nmol L−1 d−1. In the northern transect (Fig. 3F, Fig. 6), the highest rates of N2 fixation over the vertical profiles were measured in the oxycline as in 2010, and mean rates (n = 3) reached 0.15±0.13 nmol L−1 d−1 at Station 7 and 0.19±0.28 nmol L−1 d−1 at Station 9 at the oxycline. At station 11, the highest rates were found in surface waters (0.22±0.19 nmol L−1 d−1) but rates at the oxycline were also measurable (0.06±0.03 nmol L−1 d−1). Below the OMZ (ca. 400–2000 m), rates were also measurable and ranged from 0.00±0.01 to 0.21±0.13 nmol L−1 d−1, the highest rates being measured at station 9 at 1000 m depth. In the southern transect (Fig. 4F, Fig. 6), the rates ranged from 0.00±0.01 to 0.26±0.12 nmol L−1 d−1, the highest rates being observed at Station 1 just below the second oxycline at 750 m depth. At this station, aphotic rates were measurable at 450 m, 750 m, 1000 m and 1500 m depth. Integrated rates over the 2000 m watercolumn ranged from 24±14 µmol m−2 d−1 at Station 5 to 118±87 µmol m−2 d−1 at Station 1 (Table 1). The average integrated rates over the 2011 cruise were 64 µmol m−2 d−1. Integrated N2 fixation rates over the aphotic zone accounted for 90% of total rates measured over the entire watercolumn (Table 1) over the cruise.
Figure 6
Vertical profiles (0–2000 m) of N2 fixation rates (nmol L−1 d−1) during the 2011 cruise (R/V Melville).
Open circles: individual N2 fixation measurements at each depth. Black line: dissolved oxygen concentrations (µmol Kg−1) divided by 500 to fit on the same scale.
Vertical profiles (0–2000 m) of N2 fixation rates (nmol L−1 d−1) during the 2011 cruise (R/V Melville).
Open circles: individual N2 fixation measurements at each depth. Black line: dissolved oxygenconcentrations (µmol Kg−1) divided by 500 to fit on the same scale.During the 2010 cruise, nutrient concentrations in the core of the OMZ (140 to 450 m) where experiments were performed ranged from 24.0 to 37.0 µmol L−1 for NOx and 1.20 and 3.00 µmol L−1 for PO4
3− (data not shown). Mean N2 fixation rates in control bottles at Stations 5, 7 and 11 were 0.12±0.02, 0.16±0.04 and 0.17±0.02 nmol N L−1 d−1, respectively (n = 3; Fig. 7). At the 2 most oceanic Stations 5 and 7, glucose amendments did not result in any significant increase of N2 fixation (p>0.05). At Station 11 near the Peruvian coast, glucose amendments resulted in a significant (p<0.05) increase in N2 fixation rates by a factor of 3.2, to reach 0.56±0.04 nmol N L−1 d−1 (Fig. 7).
Figure 7
Effect of glucose additions on mean N2 fixation rates (n = 3) during the Atlantis cruise (2010).
Data from bioassay experiments performed in the OMZ at Stations 5, 7 and 11. The error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate incubations. Treatment means were compared using the 2-tailed non parametric Mann-Whitney mean comparison test (n = 3, α = 0.05, unpaired samples). Means that are significantly different (p<0.05) from the control are labeled with an asterisk.
Effect of glucose additions on mean N2 fixation rates (n = 3) during the Atlantis cruise (2010).
Data from bioassay experiments performed in the OMZ at Stations 5, 7 and 11. The error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate incubations. Treatment means were compared using the 2-tailed non parametric Mann-Whitney mean comparison test (n = 3, α = 0.05, unpaired samples). Means that are significantly different (p<0.05) from the control are labeled with an asterisk.During the 2011 cruise, nutrient concentrations in the core of the OMZ (320 to 475 m) where experiments were performed ranged between 33.12 and 38.72 µmol L−1 for NOx and from 2.33 to 3.03 µmol L−1 for PO4. Mean N2 fixation rates in the control bottles ranged from 0.00±0.01 at Station 11 to 0.07±0.01 and 0.07±0.04 nmol N L−1 d−1 at Stations 9 and 5, respectively (n = 3; Fig. 8). At Stations 1 and 9, N2 fixation rates were significantly (p<0.05) stimulated by simplecarbohydrate additions by a factor of 5.5 and 4.6, to reach 0.14±0.07 and 0.30±0.30 nmol N L−1 d−1, respectively (Fig. 8). At all stations, the addition of amino acids resulted in a significant (p<0.05) increase in N2 fixation rates, by a factor of 4 to 7. The highest rates were reached at Station 9 after AA additions with 0.27±0.08 nmol N L−1 d−1. ATP addition never resulted in any significant increase of N2 fixation rates (p>0.05) and NO3
− additions never resulted in any decrease of N2 fixation rates (p>0.05). However, at Station 7, NO3
− additions resulted in a significant (p<0.05) increase of N2 fixation by a factor of 7 to 0.07±0.02 nmol N L−1 d−1.
Figure 8
Effects of nutrient additions on mean N2 fixation rates (n = 3) during the Melville cruise (2011) (C: Control, AA: Amino acids, CH: Carbohydrates).
Data from bioassay experiments performed in the OMZ at (A) Stations 7, (B) Station 9, (C) Station 11, (D) Station 5, (E) Station 1, and (F) Station 6 during the Melville cruise (2011). The error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate incubations. Treatment means were compared using the 2-tailed non parametric Mann-Whitney mean comparison test (n = 3, α = 0.05, unpaired samples). Means that were significantly different (p<0.05) from the control are labeled with an asterisk.
Effects of nutrient additions on mean N2 fixation rates (n = 3) during the Melville cruise (2011) (C: Control, AA: Amino acids, CH: Carbohydrates).
Data from bioassay experiments performed in the OMZ at (A) Stations 7, (B) Station 9, (C) Station 11, (D) Station 5, (E) Station 1, and (F) Station 6 during the Melville cruise (2011). The error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate incubations. Treatment means were compared using the 2-tailed non parametric Mann-Whitney mean comparison test (n = 3, α = 0.05, unpaired samples). Means that were significantly different (p<0.05) from the control are labeled with an asterisk.
Phylogenetic characterization of diazotrophs in 2010 glucose addition bioassays
A full phylogeneticcharacterization of diazotrophs in the upper 200 m of the ETSP watercolumn was performed during the same cruises and is detailed in a companion paper [42]. In this study we report the complementary phylogeneticcharacterization of samples from the core of the OMZ (Fig. 8). Partial nifH sequences recovered during deep glucose addition bioassays during 2010 at Stations 5, 7 and 11, indicated that diazotrophs were present in the deep waters of the OMZ. The diazotrophiccommunity was comprised of non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs affiliated with nifH clusters 1K (predominantly comprised of α-proteobacteria), 1G (predominantly comprised of γ-proteobacteria), and 3 (sulfate reducing genera of the δ-proteobacteria as well Clostridium spp., Vibrio spp, etc.) (Fig. 9). Clear differences exist between OMZ diazotrophiccommunity composition at each station. The Station 5 community was dominated by nifH cluster 1K sequences, many of which are closely related to a phylotype (94–97% nucleic acid similarity) originally reported at Hydrostation S (North Atlantic) from a depth of 1000 m (BT5167A10 (DQ481253) [47]), although a few putative γ-proteobacteral (1G) sequences were also recovered that affiliated with γETSP3, a cluster recovered from the ETSP [42]. Although the lowest number of total sequences was recovered from Station 7, they were mainly affiliated with cluster 1G, along with a few 1K sequences. In contrast, clone libraries from Station 11 were dominated by cluster 3 sequences, along with a few 1G sequences, but no 1K sequences (Fig. 9).
Figure 9
Results from the molecular analyses of the 2010 glucose amendment experiments.
Neighbor joining tree of partial nifH nucleotide sequences. Nodes are labeled with nifH cluster designations according to the convention established [74]. The number of sequences recovered from stations and treatments for each phylotype are indicated in boxes to the right of the tree.
Results from the molecular analyses of the 2010 glucose amendment experiments.
Neighbor joining tree of partial nifH nucleotide sequences. Nodes are labeled with nifH cluster designations according to the convention established [74]. The number of sequences recovered from stations and treatments for each phylotype are indicated in boxes to the right of the tree.Despite being prevalent in clone libraries, both αETSP1 and cIII-ETSP groups were not detected at abundances great enough to quantify using Taqman® qPCR assays during the course of these experiments (see Figuer S1 in File S1). Because the abundances of these targets did not increase as a result of nutrient amendments, it is difficult to speculate whether any of them were responsible for the increased N2 fixation rates we measured after glucose addition.
Discussion
Active N2 fixation in deep and NO3-rich waters of the ETSP
In this study, we measured during 2 consecutive years N2 fixation in surface waters affected by the OMZ, but reveal that N2 fixation below the euphotic zone is more important: 87 and 90% of total areal N2 fixation were measured in the aphotic zone in 2010 and 2011, respectively. In these aphotic layers, volumetricN2 fixation rates were relatively low (<1.00 nmol N L−1 d−1), but when integrated over the whole aphotic layer, they ranged from 84 to 501 µmol N m−2 d−1 in 2010 and from 19±09 to 117±86 µmol N m−2 d−1 in 2011 (Table 1). In 2011, rate measurements were replicated (triplicates) and calculations performed very carefully using a real T0 for every depth. These 2011 measurements are thus more reliable than those measured in 2010. These measurements in aphotic waters add new information compared previously published studies [26], [28] in the area. The hypotheses explaining the persistence of N2 fixation in these high NOx (ca. 40 µmol L−1) environments are largely developed in the companion paper [28]. First, fixed N loss processes occur in this region [31], [48], creating a deficit of N relative to P, which is potentially favorable for N2 fixation [24]. In particular, anammox removes NH4
+, which has an immediate inhibitory effect on N2 fixation [49]. Secondly, N2 fixation is an anaerobic process [50] due to the irreversible inactivation of the nitrogenase enzyme by O2
[51]. It is possible that the low O2concentrations in the OMZ and down to 2000 m contribute to the protection of nitrogenase [52], decrease the energy cost of maintaining intracellular anaerobiosis [53], and thus facilitate N2 fixation. Finally, redox conditions in the OMZ favor the equilibrium formation of the most bioavailable form of iron Fe2+
[54], which could help to support the high Fe requirements of nitrogenase [16], [17]. For these reasons, OMZs and deeper waters may represent favorable ecological niches for N2 fixation, as shown in this study.
Potential impacts on N budgets in the ETSP
AphoticN2 fixation is currently ignored in oceanicN budgets based on biogeochemical rate measurements. However, this dataset indicates that rates in aphotic waters of the ETSP are of the same order of magnitude than those commonly measured in the tropical and sub-tropical NO3
−-depleted surface ocean (Table 2), where N2 fixation has commonly been studied. The potential significance of the N2 fixation rates measured in our study can be evaluated by comparing them with fixed N losses via denitrification and anammox measured in the same region. N losses in the ETSP have been estimated to range from 9 to 25 Tg N yr−1 (Table 3, [31], [55], [56], [57]) in the upwelling area extending 175 km offshore, and 1860 km along the Peruvian-Chilean coast with an area extant of 3.26×1011 m2
[31], [56]. If we consider the same spatial extent for N2 fixation, this process could potentially add 0.04 to 0.9 Tg N yr−1 (Table 3), counterbalancing 0.16 to 10% of the estimated N loss processes in this area (calculations have been performed only using numbers from the 2011). However, the anammox and denitrification measurements mentioned above [31] were performed under conditions of excess substrate availability and therefore represent maximum estimates of N loss rates. In contrast, the 15N2 bubble method used to quantify N2 fixation [58] may underestimate rates [38], [39].
Table 2
Examples of published studies showing the range of oceanic N2 fixation areal rates measured in some contrasting oceanic environments.
Location
Areal rates (µmol m−2 d−1)
Integration depth (m)
Reference
Hypoxic basin (Southern California Bight)
150
885
[37]
ETSP coastal OMZ
7–190
120
[26]
ETSP
0–148
150–200
[28]
ETSP subtropical gyre
12–190
150–200
[14]
Eastern North Pacific gyre
520
mixed layer
[20]
North Atlantic
59–898
15 (Trichodesmium bloom)
[3]
ETSP aphotic zone
19–501
2000
This study
Table 3
Comparison between estimated fixed N losses via denitrification and anammox and fixed N gains via N2 fixation (estimated from the 0–2000 m depth integrated rates measured in this study) in the ETSP.
Area considered
N losses
N gains (based on 2011 cruise)
N gains (based on 2010+2011 cruise)
(m2)
(Tg.yr−1)
(Tg.yr−1)
(Tg.yr−1)
*3.26×1011
**9–25
0.04–0.9
0.05–1.1
2.23×1012
9–25
0.3–1
0.3–7
[31], [56]. Upwelling area extending 175 km from, and 1860 km along the Peruvian-Chilean coast
[31], [55], [56], [57]. Estimates from
[31], [56]. Upwelling area extending 175 km from, and 1860 km along the Peruvian-Chilean coast[31], [55], [56], [57]. Estimates fromSecondly, denitrification and anammox are restricted to subsurface suboxic or anoxic waters [59], whereas N2 fixation is not. Further, denitrification and anammox appear to be restricted to the coastal upwelling system within ca. 175 km of the Peruvian-Chilean coast (the few data available at open ocean stations indicate that N loss processes were below detection limit during the 2010 cruise, Hamersley et al., (Pers. Com.)). N2 fixation in the ETSP is active over a much greater spatial extent than N loss processes. If we consider the spatial extent of the N2 fixation measurements in the ETSP covered by our cruises (2.23×1012 m2), we estimate that N2 fixation could potentially add 0.3 to 1 Tg N to the system in this area and therefore could compensate for up to 11% of the estimated N loss processes in the upwelling region of the ETSP (Table 3) (without taking into account methodological under- or overestimations). These estimates of N gains are the minimum ones calculated by taking into account only the 2011 cruise. If we take into account the 2010 cruise, N2 fixation could potentially compensate up to 0.3 to 7 Tg N to the system (Table 3) (i.e. up to 78% of N losses). N2 fixation in deep waters of the ETSP may be a significant source of N for the ETSP, and needs to be taken into account in future N budgets. Further coupled measurements between N gain and loss processes at the same stations/depths need to be performed to better constrain the magnitude of N gains in this region.
Effects of nutrients on N2 fixation
The diazotrophiccommunity of the ETSP characterized in this study, as well as in a companion study [42] is comprised of an assemblage of non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs, and little can be inferred about their metabolism from partial nifH sequences. However, we performed nutrient addition bioassays using molecules representing common labile components of the dissolved organic matter pool in marine waters (simplecarbohydrates, amino-acids and ATP), which shed some light on nutrient control of N2 fixation in the core of the OMZ. Our results indicated that simplecarbohydrate additions significantly stimulated N2 fixation at stations located nearest the coast during both cruises and at Station 9 during the 2011 cruise (Figs. 7, 8). In OMZs, organicC is largely supplied by vertical flux of planktonic production from shallower layers or by horizontal transport [60]. Thus this supply of organicC is not constant but rather episodic, which could explain why N2 fixation appears so variable in space, in time, and between cruises and years, as reported in the present study and by [26]. This seems to be the case for N loss processes as well, since organicC supply has been correlated with regional denitrification [60] and anammox [31], [61] rates in OMZs. Ward et al. [62] demonstrated that denitrification rates were significantly stimulated in the OMZ of the ETSP by organicC additions. To our knowledge our study is the first designed to study the response of diazotrophs to nutrient additions in the OMZ. In surface waters, significant stimulation of N2 fixation rates by glucose additions have been reported during the same cruise at Station 9 [28]. A significant stimulation of bacterial production after glucose amendments in surface waters of the Chilean upwelling system have also been reported [63]. Finally, in surface waters of the southwest Pacific [64], reported a significant increase of nifH gene copies of unicellular diazotrophiccyanobacteria such as Group A (UCYN-A) and Crocosphaera after glucose and mannitol additions, hypothesizing that this capacity may allow conservation of energy by rapid uptake and recycling of sugars. However, it has to be noted that the large variability in the response to carbohydrates addition (high standard deviation at Station 11 for example) could be explained by the fact that it may be coincidental whether the taxa that benefit from the enrichment possess the nifH gene.Because the organicC molecules tested here are also energy-rich molecules easily entering catabolic pathways, one could interpret our results to be indicative of limitation either by energy or by assimilative C availability. However, in our experiments N2 fixation was not stimulated by ATP additions at any station, indicating that C and not energy might have been the proximate limiting factor. In some oligotrophic P-limited environments, ATP is also a source of P for bacteria and uptake rates of ATP exceed those of glucose [65]; however, in OMZs, P is not limiting relative to N, which may further restrict the ability of ATP to stimulate N2 fixation rates in our bioassays. In contrast, the addition of free amino acids stimulated N2 fixation at all stations tested; this has also been shown in aphotic oxynenated waters of the Red Sea [66]. Amino acids are a source of both C and N, and it has been suggested that it is energetically advantageous for microbes to use preformed compounds such as amino acids rather than glucose as C sources [67]. In terrestrial legume-rhizobium symbioses, the diazotrophic bacteria assimilate amino acids such as glutamic acid provided by the host, which facilitate both dicarboxylate oxidation and ammonium assimilation into asparagine [68]. In Azospirillum sp., additions of glutamic acid also stimulated N2 fixation activity [69] by providing a C and energy source to the diazotrophs, while N was still provided via N2 fixation. It may be that similar nutrient assimilation dynamics are occurring in diazotrophs in the ETSP OMZ.Ambient NOxconcentrations were high (ca. 30–40 µmol L−1) at all stations where nutrient additions were performed, and NO3
− additions (8 µmol L−1) never resulted in N2 fixation inhibition at any station. As the metabolic potential of diazotrophs present in the OMZ have not yet been fully characterized, we do not know if they possess genes for reduction and assimilation of NO3
− or NO2
−. Detailed studies at the single cell level would be needed to characterize the metabolism of these organisms and understand why microbes fix N2 in the presence of so much NO3
−. In addition to possible energy and C, N and P sources derived from molecules like amino acids, carbohydrates or ATP, electron sources and donors are also very important to know for characterizing the physiology of the diazotrophs present in the ETSP. Molecules like O2, NO3
− and less favorably SO4
2− are common electron acceptor and they are used for different types of respirations like aerobic respiration, or anaerobic denitrification and sulfate reduction. These different respiratory pathways potentially supporting N2 fixation are performed by organisms with different physiology which each have their own environmental sensitivities for fixing N2.Our characterization of the diazotrophiccommunity in the core of the OMZ revealed the presence of potential N2-fixing heterotrophs based on the presence of the nifH gene. We did not detect the cyanobacterial diazotrophscommonly found in other regions of the open ocean; in contrast, most of the nifH genes amplified from the OMZclustered with α-, γ- and δ-proteobacteria. This result is consistent with the observations of Turk-Kubo [42] in the upper 200 m of the ETSP watercolumn, where 96% of sequences were also affiliated with proteobacteria. Based on these results, and other studies conducted in the ETSP and the South Pacific Gyre [14], [26], [70], it is clear that the ETSP diazotrophiccommunity is different from other well-studied tropical and sub-tropical oceans such as that of the North Pacific, North Atlantic and Indian Oceans. The cyanobacterial diazotrophic phylotypes commonly found at high abundances in these other ocean provinces appear to be either sporadically present at low abundances (i.e. Trichodesmium, UCYN-A), or undetected altogether (i.e. UCYN-B, diatom-diazotroph associations) in the ETSP.The amplification of diverse non-cyanobacterial nifH-containing organisms from OMZ waters in the ETSP affiliated with nifH clusters 1K, 1G and 3, is consistent with the findings of other studies conducted in anaerobic waters [26], [36], [71] and in abyssopelagic waters [47]. However, the results from this study underscore the difficulty inherent in identifying the diazotrophiccommunity responsible for N2 fixation rates. It is important to note that nifH cluster 1K sequences have been reported as contaminants in many studies, including a study in the ETSP [42]. However, none of the sequences recovered here had greater than 90% amino acid similarity and 83% nucleic acid similarity to reported contaminants. Nevertheless, as a result of the use of highly degenerate primers and nested PCR cycles necessary to amplify this important but low-abundance gene target, contamination must always be considered as a source for heterotrophic diazotroph sequences, whether from PCR and DNA extraction reagents or from sampling or handling procedures, despite the screening of PCR and reagent blank controls as in this study.Furthermore, although it is clear that a diverse assemblage of non-cyanobacterial nifH-containing organisms are present in the OMZ of the ETSP, the best methodologies currently available to characterize dominant members of the diazotrophiccommunity (PCR amplification using degenerate nifH primers) often identify organisms present at extremely low levels when targeted using quantitative approaches (i.e. qPCR; Fig. S1 in File S1) [42], [47], [71]. This, in turn, makes it difficult to argue that these organisms are capable of fixing N2 at cell-specific rates great enough to account for measured bulk rates. An analysis of the expected N2 fixation rates based on abundances and plausible cell-specificN2 fixation rates in the ETSP discussed in [42] indicate that these proteobacteria are unlikely to be responsible for all the measured bulk rates and therefore other N2-fixing organisms could be responsible for a part of N2 fixation in this region but may remain uncharacterized. Identifying which organisms are actively transcribing nifH using techniques such as reverse transcription (RT)-qPCR might provide more insight into which diazotrophic taxa are actively fixing nitrogen. However, the challenge of identifying which organisms are important N2-fixers remains the same when designing qPCR primers from sequences derived from RT-PCR based clone libraries, and are further convoluted by potentially low transcript abundances per cell and/or the timing of sampling with respect to diel changes in nifH expression (even in the case of heterotrophs).
Conclusions
This study provides one of the first estimates of N2 fixation rates in aphoticwaters of the ETSP. It reveals that N2 fixation in aphotic environments is the largest contributor to total areal N2 fixation in ETSP. N2 fixation in high [NO3
−] environments remains an enigma as it requires an additional energeticcost relative to NO3
− or NH4
+. Further physiological studies are needed to understand the physiological regulation of N2 fixation, especially on newly discovered diazotrophic organisms. Contrary to N2 fixation performed in euphotic layer which sustains new primary production [3], aphoticN2 fixation may sustain organic matter remineralization. These new sources of Ncould potentially compensate for as much as 78% of the estimated N loss processes in ETSP, indicating that they need to be taken into account in marine N budgets. Phylogenetic studies confirm the presence of diazotrophs in the deep waters on the OMZ, which are distinct from cyanobacterial phylotypes commonly found in surface oligotrophicwaters of the tropical ocean. Organic and inorganic nutrient addition bioassays reveal that amino acids and simplecarbohydrates stimulate N2 fixation in the core of the OMZ, and the episodic supply of these nutrients from upper layers may explain the large temporal and spatial variability of N2 fixation in the ETSP. Research on marine heterotrophicN2 fixation is at its beginning and significant progress needs to be made in the refinement of the methods to estimate planktonicN2 fixation in OMZs (15N2 bubble method versus 15N2-enriched seawater) from bulk measurements to single cells analysis. The 15N-enriched seawater method should be coupled to oxygen-free and trace metal-clean procedures to provide more accurate estimates. Progress also needs to be made in the characterization of the community responsible for N2 fixation in these deep waters, as well as the control of their population dynamics by the supply of organic matter. Estimates of global N2 fixation based on field measurements [5], [72] are presently lower than geochemically-based (nutrient stoichiometry and isotopic ratio) estimates [73]. Taking into account deep N2 fixation might help to resolve some of this discrepancy. However, progress also needs to be made in the quantification of N loss processes, as recent studies indicate that they may be less sensitive to oxygen than previously thought [59], further complicating the N budget in the ETSP. In future studies, N gain and loss measurements need to be coupled in space and time to further resolve the N budget in the ETSP.Supporting methods, Table S1, and Figure S1.(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Hanna Farnelid; Mikkel Bentzon-Tilia; Anders F Andersson; Stefan Bertilsson; Günter Jost; Matthias Labrenz; Klaus Jürgens; Lasse Riemann Journal: ISME J Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Jonathan P Zehr; Shellie R Bench; Brandon J Carter; Ian Hewson; Faheem Niazi; Tuo Shi; H James Tripp; Jason P Affourtit Journal: Science Date: 2008-11-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Kendra A Turk-Kubo; Katherine M Achilles; Tracy R C Serros; Mari Ochiai; Joseph P Montoya; Jonathan P Zehr Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Amal Jayakumar; Bonnie X Chang; Brittany Widner; Peter Bernhardt; Margaret R Mulholland; Bess B Ward Journal: ISME J Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: María E Alcamán-Arias; Jerónimo Cifuentes-Anticevic; Wilson Castillo-Inaipil; Laura Farías; Cynthia Sanhueza; Beatriz Fernández-Gómez; Josefa Verdugo; Leslie Abarzua; Christina Ridley; Javier Tamayo-Leiva; Beatriz Díez Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2022-05-31
Authors: Pia H Moisander; Mar Benavides; Sophie Bonnet; Ilana Berman-Frank; Angelicque E White; Lasse Riemann Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Mar Benavides; Pia H Moisander; Hugo Berthelot; Thorsten Dittmar; Olivier Grosso; Sophie Bonnet Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 3.240