| Literature DB >> 35744658 |
María E Alcamán-Arias1,2,3, Jerónimo Cifuentes-Anticevic4, Wilson Castillo-Inaipil4, Laura Farías1,2, Cynthia Sanhueza4, Beatriz Fernández-Gómez4,5, Josefa Verdugo6, Leslie Abarzua1, Christina Ridley2,4, Javier Tamayo-Leiva2,4,7, Beatriz Díez2,4,7.
Abstract
Although crucial for the addition of new nitrogen in marine ecosystems, dinitrogen (N2) fixation remains an understudied process, especially under dark conditions and in polar coastal areas, such as the West Antarctic Peninsula (WAP). New measurements of light and dark N2 fixation rates in parallel with carbon (C) fixation rates, as well as analysis of the genetic marker nifH for diazotrophic organisms, were conducted during the late summer in the coastal waters of Chile Bay, South Shetland Islands, WAP. During six late summers (February 2013 to 2019), Chile Bay was characterized by high NO3- concentrations (~20 µM) and an NH4+ content that remained stable near 0.5 µM. The N:P ratio was approximately 14.1, thus close to that of the Redfield ratio (16:1). The presence of Cluster I and Cluster III nifH gene sequences closely related to Alpha-, Delta- and, to a lesser extent, Gammaproteobacteria, suggests that chemosynthetic and heterotrophic bacteria are primarily responsible for N2 fixation in the bay. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation ranged from 51.18 to 1471 nmol C L-1 d-1, while dark chemosynthesis ranged from 9.24 to 805 nmol C L-1 d-1. N2 fixation rates were higher under dark conditions (up to 45.40 nmol N L-1 d-1) than under light conditions (up to 7.70 nmol N L-1 d-1), possibly contributing more than 37% to new nitrogen-based production (≥2.5 g N m-2 y-1). Of all the environmental factors measured, only PO43- exhibited a significant correlation with C and N2 rates, being negatively correlated (p < 0.05) with dark chemosynthesis and N2 fixation under the light condition, revealing the importance of the N:P ratio for these processes in Chile Bay. This significant contribution of N2 fixation expands the ubiquity and biological potential of these marine chemosynthetic diazotrophs. As such, this process should be considered along with the entire N cycle when further reviewing highly productive Antarctic coastal waters and the diazotrophic potential of the global marine ecosystem.Entities:
Keywords: WAP/new production; diazotrophy; heterotrophic diazotrophy; nitrogen fixation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35744658 PMCID: PMC9227844 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10061140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Geographic location of Chile Bay on Greenwich Island, Western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP). The red square (A–C) represents the P3 sampling point in the bay where seawater was collected to measure environmental variables and N2 fixation and carbon assimilation rates.
Chile Bay physicochemical variables during the late summer periods (February–March) of 2013–2014 and 2016–2019. Inorganic nutrients (NO3−, NO2− NH4+, PO43−) and the N:P ratio [N = (NO3− + NO2− + NH4+); p = PO43−] were assessed.
| Date | Depth (m) | Temperature °C | Salinity | Chl- | NH4+ (µM) | NO2− (µM) | NO3− (µM) | PO43− (µM) | N:P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 February 2013 | 2 | 0.55 | 34.15 | 0.03 | NaN | 0.32 | 20.52 | 1.62 | 12.85 |
| 14 February 2014 | 2 | −0.11 | 33.20 | 0.36 | NaN | 0.16 | 19.52 | 1.61 | 12.22 |
| 22 February 2014 | 2 | 0.34 | 33.47 | 1.18 | NaN | 0.13 | 17.16 | 1.53 | 11.30 |
| 22 February 2016 | 2 | −0.25 | NaN | 1.01 | NaN | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 14.56 ± 0.16 | 1.57 ± 0.16 | 9.45 |
| 10 February 2017 | 2 | 2.23 | 34.03 | 0.69 ± 0.32 | 0.33 ± 0.07 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 21.64 ± 2.12 | 1.43 ± 0.11 | 15.52 |
| 21 February 2017 | 30 | 1.42 | 34.16 | 0.327 ± 0.17 | 0.61 ± 0.09 | 0.204 ± 0.03 | 23.3 ± 4.55 | 1.61 ± 0.13 | 14.98 |
| 9 February 2018 | 30 | 1.33 | 34.05 | 1.55 ± 1.63 | 0.96 ± 0.29 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 20.90 ± 3.73 | 1.53 ± 0.30 | 14.50 |
| 16 February 2018 | 2 | 1.61 | 34.01 | 3.58 ± 2.07 | 0.93 ± 0.09 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 17.70 ± 5.50 | 1.04 ± 0.42 | 18.22 |
| 17 February 2019 | 2 | 1.54 | 34.10 | 2.14 ± 1.90 | 0.48 ± 0.18 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 16.50 ± 3.97 | 1.19 ± 0.27 | 14.39 |
| 8 March 2019 | 2 | 1.11 | 34.36 | 4.17 ± 2.03 | 1.19 ± 0.54 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 15.55 ± 4.31 | 1.20 ± 0.23 | 14.11 |
| 8 March 2019 | 30 | 1.16 | 34.21 | 2.83 ± 1.81 | 1.27 ± 0.78 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 17.28 ± 4.06 | 1.13 ± 0.26 | 16.52 |
± = standard deviation.
Figure 2Phylogenetic placement of NifH protein sequences identified in coastal waters of Chile Bay. The phylogenetic placement was carried out using a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction that included annotated reference NifH protein sequences and novel NifH protein sequences retrieved from Tara Oceans metagenomes. Short NifH amino acid sequences are shown with a white background. NifH sequences obtained from Chile Bay are shown in bold. The number of reads assigned to each OTU, and their respective relative abundance, is shown in parenthesis (# of reads-% relative abundance). The tree was rooted to archaeal NifH sequences from Cluster II. The branch color indicates the NifH cluster, while the label background indicates the taxonomy of the NifH sequence. Black circles in the nodes indicate ≥95% of ultra-fast bootstrap and ≥80% of SH-aLRT branch support.
Figure 3Interannual marine nitrogen ((a), 15N2) fixation and carbon ((b), 13C) assimilation rates in Chile Bay during the late summer in 2013–2014 and 2016–2019. The white bars represent light incubations and black bars represent dark incubations. The error bars represent triplicate rates. Significant differences between rates (p-value) were evaluated by the t-test.
Contribution of marine N2 fixation to local primary production (N2LPP) and new production (N2NP) in Chile Bay based on the C:N ratio and nitrogen (N2) and carbon (C) fixation rates under light and dark conditions.
| 15N2 Contribution to | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Sample Depth (m) | Condition | molC:molN | Marine 15N2 Fixation | Total Marine 13C Uptake | Total N2LPP (C) * | Total N2P (N) ** |
| (nmol N L−1 d−1) | (nmol C L−1 d−1) | % | % | ||||
| 8 February 2013 | 2 | Light | 10.49 | 0.64 ± 0.06 | 1471 ± 101.51 | 0.46 | 0.76 |
| 14 February 2014 | 2 | Light | 7.47 | 1.03 ± 0.002 | 723 ± 97.91 | 1.07 | 4.29 |
| 22 February 2014 | 2 | Light | 5.95 | 0.45 ± 0.14 | 51.18 ± 31.50 | 5.23 | 0.66 |
| 22 February 2016 | 2 | Light | 6.80 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 837 ± 5515.2 | 0.54 | 9.82 |
| 10 February 2017 | 2 | Light | 5.82 | 0.35 ± 0.09 | 463 ± 104 | 0.44 | 0.31 |
| 16 February 2018 | 2 | Light | 5.02 | 7.70 ± 4.42 | 677 ± 76.3 | 5.71 | 3.84 |
| 17 February 2019 | 2 | Light | 4.11 | 6.54 ± 0.20 | 643 | 4.18 | 4.35 |
| 8 March 2019 | 2 | Light | 3.11 | 2.03 ± 0.57 | 1380 | 0.46 | 1.39 |
| 8 February 2013 | 2 | Darkness | 0.18 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 38.37 ± 22.04 | 0.25 | 4.66 |
| 14 February 2014 | 2 | Darkness | 7.65 | 0.17 ± 0.05 | 36.80 ± 2.93 | 3.50 | 0.60 |
| 22 February 2014 | 2 | Darkness | 6.43 | 0.81 ± 0.05 | 39.60 ± 17.53 | 13.15 | 0.82 |
| 22 February 2016 | 2 | Darkness | 6.31 | 0.48 | 100 ± 32.51 | 3.00 | 37.59 |
| 10 February 2017 | 2 | Darkness | 4.72 | 1.02 ± 0.73 | 595 ± 109 | 0.81 | 2.26 |
| 16 February 2018 | 2 | Darkness | 4.22 | 18.78 ± 2.19 | 468 ± 165 | 16.93 | 5.76 |
| 17 February 2019 | 2 | Darkness | 4.69 | 24.51 ± 1.40 | 338 ± 167 | 34.01 | 36.96 |
| 8 March 2019 | 2 | Darkness | 3.29 | 7.96 ± 0.38 | 805 ± 345 | 3.25 | 15.99 |
| 21 February 2017 | 30 | Darkness | 4.96 | 2.39 ± 1.53 | 9.24 ± 4.70 | 128 | 5.13 |
| 9 February 2018 | 30 | Darkness | 7.10 | 45.40 ± 10.09 | 91.47 ± 40.09 | 354 | 12.88 |
| 8 March 2019 | 30 | Darkness | 3.55 | 1.21 ± 0.27 | 482 ± 123 | 0.89 | 2.80 |
* N2LPP = contibution of N2 fixation on local primary production based on carbon; ** N2P= contibution of N2 fixation on new production based on nitrogen; ± =standard deviation.
Figure 4Nitrogen fixation and carbon assimilation rates in association with phosphate (PO43−) concentrations. Light and dark nitrogen fixation (a) and carbon assimilation (b) were strongly correlated with PO43− concentrations in Chile Bay. All axes were transformed to log scale. R2 and p-value significance values for each analysis are shown on each plot.