Literature DB >> 24322540

Posterior stabilization of cervical spine injuries using the Roy-Camille plates: a long-term follow-up.

Demitrios Korres1, Vassilios S Nikolaou, Maria Kaseta, Demetrios Evangelopoulos, Kostas Markatos, John Lazarettos, Nicolas Efstathopoulos.   

Abstract

AIM: Posterior cervical spine fixation has undergone tremendous advancement in recent years. The purpose of this study is to present our experience with the Roy-Camille instrumentation for posterior cervical stabilization after injury in a long-term follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1985 to 1995, 76 patients with a lower cervical spine traumatic lesion were treated in a single institution by posterior plate stabilization using the Roy-Camille plates (R-C plates). Fifty-four men and 22 women with a mean age of 43.2 years were involved. In 59 patients the injuries were due to a road traffic accident, in 14 cases the fall from a high was responsible, while in two cases the injuries were due to sport activities. There were four bilateral dislocations, nine unilateral dislocations, 56 fracture dislocations, five fracture separations of a lateral mass and two burst fractures. Neurological lesions were present in 65 patients (9 ASIA A, 16 ASIA B, 22 ASIA C, 18 ASIA D and 11 ASIA E). All patients had minimum follow-up of 7 years. Fifty-nine patients were followed up for a mean period of 21 years (14-27 years).
RESULTS: Stability was obtained in all but two cases. Reoperation was done in two cases: in one for the correction of the lost reduction and in a second for the reinsertion of a screw irritating a nerve root. No case in the ASIA A group showed neurological improvement, a fact observed in the other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The R-C plates were used in the last quarter of the last century. This technique showed good short-time results, and we have shown good results in a long-term follow-up as well. The literature referred to this technique was favorable, as far as the biomechanical behavior and also clinical application concern. The question about this plating system abundance still remains unanswered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24322540     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1376-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  15 in total

1.  Pullout strength comparison of two methods of orienting screw insertion in the lateral masses of the bovine cervical spine.

Authors:  T Errico; R Uhl; P Cooper; R Casar; T McHenry
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-12

2.  Quantitative anatomic evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation with a comparison of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl screw techniques.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Patrick Mertens; Jérôme Jund; François Cotton; Gilles Perrin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Anatomic considerations for plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine.

Authors:  H S An; R Gordin; K Renner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Posterior fixation of the upper cervical spine: contemporary techniques.

Authors:  Richard J Bransford; Michael J Lee; Abilio Reis
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of anterior cervical spine stabilization.

Authors:  M R Grubb; B L Currier; J S Shih; V Bonin; J J Grabowski; E Y Chao
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  E L Jones; J G Heller; D H Silcox; W C Hutton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Biomechanical analysis of cervical stabilization systems. An assessment of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Y Kotani; B W Cunningham; K Abumi; P C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Posterior cervical arthrodesis with AO reconstruction plates and bone graft.

Authors:  P A Anderson; M B Henley; M S Grady; P X Montesano; H R Winn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Instability and recurrent deformity following treatment by anterior interbody fusion.

Authors:  E S Stauffer; E G Kelly
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Posterior plates in the management of cervical instability: long-term results in 44 patients.

Authors:  M G Fehlings; P R Cooper; T J Errico
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  1 in total

1.  Safe placement of lateral mass screw in the subaxial cervical spine: a case series.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Xianda Gao; Jiang Jiang; Fanlong Kong; Yong Shen; Wenyuan Ding; Xiufang Hao; Huixian Cui
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.075

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.