Literature DB >> 28204844

Safe placement of lateral mass screw in the subaxial cervical spine: a case series.

Di Zhang1,2, Xianda Gao1, Jiang Jiang1, Fanlong Kong1, Yong Shen1, Wenyuan Ding1, Xiufang Hao1, Huixian Cui3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation has been proven to be an effective method to treat the multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy and severe cervical spondylosis. However, accurate and safe insertion of the lateral mass screw is technically demanding due to the individual variations of the anatomy of the lateral mass of the subaxial cervical spine. Misplaced lateral mass screw is not uncommon, and operation-related complications still beset the surgeons, which may impair the clinical outcomes. This study aimed to introduce a novel strategy for safe and accurate insertion of lateral mass screw in the subaxial cervical spine.
METHODS: From July 2014 to March 2015, 24 patients with multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy at C3-C6 levels received laminectomy. Before the operation, the screw insertion technique depended on the pre-operative imaging and operative exploration. Following this strategy, the lateral mass screws were inserted into the subaxial cervical spines. Post-operative radiograph was performed to observe the locations of the lateral mass screws and the cervical curvature. Patients were followed up, and the functional neurological recovery was evaluated by the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) disability scale, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and NDI ranking system.
RESULTS: All screws were inserted into the lateral mass of C3-C6 cervical vertebrae following the current technique. Post-operative CT scans confirmed all screws inserted into the safe zone and relative safe zone of the lateral mass without any screw placed into the transverse foramen. The angle between the lateral mass screw and the vertical line was 40.49 ± 5.44 degrees on the axial CT images. Twenty-four patients were followed up for an average of 25.79 months (range, 20-30 months), and 22 cases evaluated as no or mild disability. According to the JOA score, NDI score and NDI ranking system, the postoperative function of the patients was significantly better when compared with their preoperative corresponding data (all p < 0.001)
CONCLUSION: Inserting lateral mass screw following this new strategy is safe and easy to perform without any screw-related neurovascular complications, which contribute to the rigid fixation of the subaxial cervical spine and the satisfactory functional recovery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical degenerative myelopathy; Entry zone; Laminectomy; Lateral mass screw, safe insertion; Outward direction; Upward direction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28204844     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3423-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  27 in total

1.  The anatomic relation of lateral mass screws to the spinal nerves. A comparison of the Magerl, Anderson, and An techniques.

Authors:  R Xu; S P Haman; N A Ebraheim; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates.

Authors:  B Jeanneret; F Magerl; E H Ward; J C Ward
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Anatomic considerations for plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine.

Authors:  H S An; R Gordin; K Renner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Paul G Matz; Michael W Groff; Robert F Heary; Langston T Holly; Michael G Kaiser; Praveen V Mummaneni; Timothy C Ryken; Tanvir F Choudhri; Edward J Vresilovic; Daniel K Resnick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-08

6.  The location of the vertebral artery foramen and its relation to posterior lateral mass screw fixation.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; R Xu; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Comparison of anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Jiaquan Luo; Kai Cao; Sheng Huang; Liangping Li; Ting Yu; Cong Cao; Rui Zhong; Ming Gong; Zhiyu Zhou; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Nikolaos K Paschos; Emilios E Pakos; Angelos N Politis; Christina M Arnaoutoglou; Athanasios C Karageorgos; Avraam Ploumis; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Cervical laminectomy for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy.

Authors:  Timothy C Ryken; Robert F Heary; Paul G Matz; Paul A Anderson; Michael W Groff; Langston T Holly; Michael G Kaiser; Praveen V Mummaneni; Tanvir F Choudhri; Edward J Vresilovic; Daniel K Resnick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-08

10.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Citations, non-citations and visibility of International Orthopaedics in 2017.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Andrew Quaile; Marko Pećina; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine: systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 1768 patients and 8636 screws.

Authors:  Mohamed A R Soliman; Slah Khan; Nicco Ruggiero; Brandon L Mariotti; Alexander O Aguirre; Cathleen C Kuo; Alexander G Fritz; Siddharth Sharma; Anxhela Nezha; Bennett R Levy; Asham Khan; Amany A Salem; Patrick K Jowdy; Qazi Zeeshan; Moleca M Ghannam; Robert V Starling; John Pollina; Jeffrey P Mullin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.042

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.