Literature DB >> 7855677

Biomechanical analysis of cervical stabilization systems. An assessment of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine.

Y Kotani1, B W Cunningham, K Abumi, P C McAfee.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The biomechanical stability of seven cervical reconstruction methods including the transpedicular screw fixation was evaluated under four instability patterns. These four modalities, based on the range and grade of instability, allowed a reproducible biomechanical assessment to establish the in vitro role of internal fixation in the cervical spine.
OBJECTIVES: This study biomechanically investigated the stability of seven reconstruction methods in the cervical spine as influenced by four instability patterns and assessed whether three-column fixation for the cervical spine using transpedicular screw fixation would provide increased stability over that of conventional cervical fixation systems.
METHODS: A total of 24 calf cervical spine specimens were divided into four experimental groups. The spinal constructs including seven reconstruction techniques--the posterior AO titanium reconstruction plate, Bohlman's posterior triple-wiring, transpedicular screw fixation, anterior iliac bone graft, anterior AcroMed plate, anterior AO titanium locking plate, and combined fixation with the AO anterior plate and posterior triple-wiring--were tested under four loading modes.
RESULTS: Anterior plating methods provided less stability than that of posterior constructs under axial, torsional, and flexural loading conditions. Exclusive posterior procedures provided increased stability compared with the intact spine in one level fixation, however, did not sustain the torsional stability when the anterior and middle column was eliminated in two-level fixation. The stabilizing capabilities of both the combined fixation and transpedicular screw fixation were clearly demonstrated in all loading modes, however, those of the latter were superior in multilevel fixation.
CONCLUSION: Front and back approaches, employing the anterior plate and posterior triple-wiring, and transpedicular screw fixation demonstrated clear biomechanical advantages when the extent of instability increased to three-column or multilevel. Three-column fixation for the cervical spine using transpedicular screw fixation offers increased stability over that of conventional cervical fixation systems, particularly in multiple level constructs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7855677     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199411001-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  79 in total

1.  Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine.

Authors:  Marcus Richter; Thomas Mattes; Balkan Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The use of pedicle screw-rod system for the posterior fixation in cervico-thoracic junction.

Authors:  Wonik Cho; Ahmed Shawky Eid; Ung-Kyu Chang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-07-31

4.  Load sharing properties of cervical pedicle screw-rod constructs versus lateral mass screw-rod constructs.

Authors:  Bradley J Dunlap; Eldin E Karaikovic; Hyung-Soon Park; Mark J Sokolowski; Li-Qun Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Juliane Zenner; Stefan Midderhoff; Stefan Middendorf; Nicolaus Graf; Nicolaus Gräf; H Resch; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Hans-Joachim Willke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparative analysis of three different cervical lateral mass screw fixation techniques by complications and bicortical purchase : cadaveric study.

Authors:  Jin-Wook Baek; Dong-Mook Park; Dae-Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-09-30

7.  Cervical pedicle screw insertion using a gutter entry point at the transitional area between the lateral mass and lamina.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Tofuku; Hiroaki Koga; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Mechanical implant failure in posterior cervical spine fusion.

Authors:  Takeshi Okamoto; Masashi Neo; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Hiromu Ito; Mitsuru Takemoto; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Posterior stabilization of cervical spine injuries using the Roy-Camille plates: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Demitrios Korres; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Maria Kaseta; Demetrios Evangelopoulos; Kostas Markatos; John Lazarettos; Nicolas Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-10

10.  Preoperative imaging of cervical pedicles: comparison of accuracy of oblique radiographs versus axial CT scans.

Authors:  James P Sieradzki; Eldin E Karaikovic; Eugene P Lautenschlager; Martin L Lazarus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.