Literature DB >> 1801270

Anatomic considerations for plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine.

H S An1, R Gordin, K Renner.   

Abstract

A cadaveric study was done to investigate the variability of interfacet distances from C3 to C7, to learn pedicle morphology at C7-T2, and to determine potential dangers of plate-screw osteosynthesis technique of the cervical spine. Twenty-two cadavers were dissected from C2 to C7 to expose the lateral masses and nerve roots. The interfacet distances from the center of the lateral mass to the next lateral mass from C3 to C7 vary widely among different individuals, ranging from 9 mm to 16 (average, 13 mm). A new plate design is necessary to better accommodate the differences in interfacet distances among different patients and different levels. The second part of the study involved 11 dissected cadaveric specimens of the cervicothoracic junction. The pedicle entry point was 1 mm inferior to the midportion of the facet joint for C7, T1, and T2. The medial angulation averaged 34 degrees at C7, 31.8 degrees at T1, and 26.5 degrees at T2. The mediolateral and superoinferior outer pedicle diameters were 6.9 mm and 7.5 mm at C7, 8.5 mm and 9.5 mm at T1, and 7.5 mm and 10.7 mm at T2, respectively. The mediolateral inner diameter averaged 5.18 mm, 6.4 mm, 5.5 mm for C7, T1 and T2, respectively. The pedicle distances (from the entry point to the posterior vertebral body line) measured 9.1 mm, 9.9 mm, and 10.4 mm for respective levels. The margins for error are small when using pedicle screws at these levels. If a pedicle screw must be used at C7, T1, and T2, one must have precise knowledge of the entrance point, diameters, and 25-30 degrees medial direction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1801270     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199110001-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  52 in total

1.  Is intraoperative CT of posterior cervical spine instrumentation cost-effective and does it reduce complications?

Authors:  Andrew C Hecht; Steven M Koehler; Janelle C Laudone; Arthur Jenkins; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Freehand determination of the trajectory angle for cervical lateral mass screws: how accurate is it?

Authors:  Debasish Pal; Edward Bayley; Sani A Magaji; Bronek M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  C7 posterior fixation using intralaminar screws : early clinical and radiographic outcome.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Jang; Jae Taek Hong; Il Sup Kim; In Sung Yeo; Byung Chul Son; Sang Won Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-08-31

4.  Load sharing properties of cervical pedicle screw-rod constructs versus lateral mass screw-rod constructs.

Authors:  Bradley J Dunlap; Eldin E Karaikovic; Hyung-Soon Park; Mark J Sokolowski; Li-Qun Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparative analysis of three different cervical lateral mass screw fixation techniques by complications and bicortical purchase : cadaveric study.

Authors:  Jin-Wook Baek; Dong-Mook Park; Dae-Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-09-30

6.  Pedicle screw fixation of the C7 vertebra using an anteroposterior fluoroscopic imaging technique.

Authors:  Shaunak Desai; Anil Sethi; Christopher C Ninh; Stephen Bartol; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A comparison of feasibility and safety of percutaneous fluoroscopic guided thoracic pedicle screws between Europeans and Asians: is there any difference?

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Reza Zamani; Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Lateral radiological evaluation of transarticular screw placement in the lower cervical spine.

Authors:  Rongming Xu; Liujun Zhao; Bo Chai; Weihu Ma; Huajie Xia; Guoping Wang; Weiyu Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  An analysis of the anatomic features of the cervical spine using computed tomography to select safer screw insertion techniques.

Authors:  Masahiro Nishinome; Haku Iizuka; Yoichi Iizuka; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Posterior stabilization of cervical spine injuries using the Roy-Camille plates: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Demitrios Korres; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Maria Kaseta; Demetrios Evangelopoulos; Kostas Markatos; John Lazarettos; Nicolas Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.