Literature DB >> 15112317

Temperature and SAR calculations for a human head within volume and surface coils at 64 and 300 MHz.

Christopher M Collins1, Wanzhan Liu, Jinghua Wang, Rolf Gruetter, J Thomas Vaughan, Kamil Ugurbil, Michael B Smith.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine relationships between specific energy absorption rate (SAR) and temperature distributions in the human head during radio frequency energy deposition in MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-tissue numerical model of the head was developed that considered thermal conductivity, heat capacity, perfusion, heat of metabolism, electrical properties, and density. Calculations of SAR and the resulting temperature increase were performed for different coils at different frequencies.
RESULTS: Because of tissue-dependent perfusion rates and thermal conduction, there is not a good overall spatial correlation between SAR and temperature increase. When a volume coil is driven to induce a head average SAR level of either 3.0 or 3.2 W/kg, it is unlikely that a significant temperature increase in the brain will occur due to its high rate of perfusion, although limits on SAR in any 1 g of tissue in the head may be exceeded.
CONCLUSION: Attempts to ensure RF safety in MRI often rely on assumptions about local temperature from local SAR levels. The relationship between local SAR and local temperature is not, however, straightforward. In cases where high SAR levels are required due to pulse sequence demands, calculations of temperature may be preferable to calculations of SAR because of the more direct relationship between temperature and safety. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15112317     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  73 in total

1.  Surface coil with reduced specific absorption rate for rat MRI at 7 T.

Authors:  Sergio E Solis-Najera; Rodrigo Martin; Fabian Vazquez; Alfredo O Rodriguez
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Analysis of the role of lead resistivity in specific absorption rate for deep brain stimulator leads at 3T MRI.

Authors:  Leonardo M Angelone; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  It's the little things: On the complexity of planar electrode heating in MRI.

Authors:  Johannes B Erhardt; Thomas Lottner; Jessica Martinez; Ali C Özen; Martin Schuettler; Thomas Stieglitz; Daniel B Ennis; Michael Bock
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  13C MRS of occipital and frontal lobes at 3 T using a volume coil for stochastic proton decoupling.

Authors:  Shizhe Li; Yan Zhang; Shumin Wang; Maria Ferraris Araneta; Christopher S Johnson; Yun Xiang; Robert B Innis; Jun Shen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  A prototype RF dosimeter for independent measurement of the average specific absorption rate (SAR) during MRI.

Authors:  John P Stralka; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  An RF dosimeter for independent SAR measurement in MRI scanners.

Authors:  Di Qian; Abdel-Monem M El-Sharkawy; Paul A Bottomley; William A Edelstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Magnetic-resonance-based electrical properties tomography: a review.

Authors:  Xiaotong Zhang; Jiaen Liu; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2014

8.  Short-term side-effects of brain MR examination at 7 T: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  M Cosottini; D Frosini; L Biagi; I Pesaresi; M Costagli; G Tiberi; M Symms; M Tosetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  (13)C MRS of human brain at 7 Tesla using [2-(13)C]glucose infusion and low power broadband stochastic proton decoupling.

Authors:  Shizhe Li; Li An; Shao Yu; Maria Ferraris Araneta; Christopher S Johnson; Shumin Wang; Jun Shen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Numerical field calculations considering the human subject for engineering and safety assurance in MRI.

Authors:  Christopher M Collins
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.