Literature DB >> 24976043

Box size effects are negligible for solvation free energies of neutral solutes.

Sreeja Parameswaran1, David L Mobley.   

Abstract

Hydration free energy calculations in explicit solvent have become an integral part of binding free energy calculations and a valuable test of force fields. Most of these simulations follow the conventional norm of keeping edge length of the periodic solvent box larger than twice the Lennard-Jones (LJ) cutoff distance, with the rationale that this should be sufficient to keep the interactions between copies of the solute to a minimum. However, for charged solutes, hydration free energies can exhibit substantial box size-dependence even at typical box sizes. Here, we examine whether similar size-dependence affects hydration of neutral molecules. Thus, we focused on two strongly polar molecules with large dipole moments, where any size-dependence should be most pronounced, and determined how their hydration free energies vary as a function of simulation box size. In addition to testing a variety of simulation box sizes, we also tested two LJ cut-off distances, 0.65 and 1.0 nm. We show from these simulations that the calculated hydration free energy is independent of the box-size as well as the LJ cut-off distance, suggesting that typical hydration free energy calculations of neutral compounds indeed need not be particularly concerned with finite-size effects as long as standard good practices are followed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24976043     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9766-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  10 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. II. The hydration free energy of the sodium cation.

Authors:  Mika A Kastenholz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

5.  Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Elise Dumont; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Accurate and efficient corrections for missing dispersion interactions in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Alchemical prediction of hydration free energies for SAMPL.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Shaui Liu; David S Cerutti; William C Swope; Julia E Rice
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Net charge changes in the calculation of relative ligand-binding free energies via classical atomistic molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Maria M Reif; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.376

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Gaetano Calabró; Daisy Y Kyu; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Applicability of a thermodynamic cycle approach for a force field parametrization targeting non-aqueous solvation free energies.

Authors:  Andreas Mecklenfeld; Gabriele Raabe
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Implementation of Telescoping Boxes in Adaptive Steered Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Yi Zhuang; Nikhil Thota; Stephen Quirk; Rigoberto Hernandez
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.578

4.  Blind prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Kalistyn H Burley; Michael Chiu; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Approaches for calculating solvation free energies and enthalpies demonstrated with an update of the FreeSolv database.

Authors:  Guilherme Duarte Ramos Matos; Daisy Y Kyu; Hannes H Loeffler; John D Chodera; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Eng Data       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Predictions of Ligand Selectivity from Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Matteo Aldeghi; Alexander Heifetz; Michael J Bodkin; Stefan Knapp; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Free Energy Perturbation Calculation of Relative Binding Free Energy between Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies and the gp120 Glycoprotein of HIV-1.

Authors:  Anthony J Clark; Tatyana Gindin; Baoshan Zhang; Lingle Wang; Robert Abel; Colleen S Murret; Fang Xu; Amy Bao; Nina J Lu; Tongqing Zhou; Peter D Kwong; Lawrence Shapiro; Barry Honig; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  GAFF/IPolQ-Mod+LJ-Fit: Optimized force field parameters for solvation free energy predictions.

Authors:  Andreas Mecklenfeld; Gabriele Raabe
Journal:  ADMET DMPK       Date:  2020-06-28

9.  On the importance of statistics in molecular simulations for thermodynamics, kinetics and simulation box size.

Authors:  Vytautas Gapsys; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.