OBJECTIVE: To provide a more complete characterization of aortic blood flow in patients following valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) compared with presurgical cohorts matched by tricuspid and bicuspid valve morphology, age and presurgical aorta size. METHODS: Four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to analyse three-dimensional (3D) blood flow in the thoracic aorta of n = 13 patients after VSARR with reimplantation of native tricuspid aortic valve (TAV, n = 6) and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV, n = 7). Results were compared with presurgical age and aortic size-matched control cohorts with TAV (n = 10) and BAV (n = 10). Pre- and post-surgical aortic flow was evaluated using time-resolved 3D pathlines using a blinded grading system (0-2, 0 = small, 1 = moderate and 2 = prominent) analysing ascending aortic (AAo) helical flow. Systolic flow profile uniformity in the aortic root, proximal and mid-AAo was evaluated using a four-quadrant model. Further analysis in nine analysis planes distributed along the thoracic aorta quantified peak systolic velocity, retrograde fraction and peak systolic flow acceleration. RESULTS: Pronounced AAo helical flow in presurgical control subjects (both BAV and TAV: helix grading = 1.8 ± 0.4) was significantly reduced (0.2 ± 0.4, P < 0.001) in cohorts after VSARR independent of aortic valve morphology. Presurgical AAo flow was highly eccentric for BAV patients but more uniform for TAV. VSARR resulted in less eccentric flow profiles. Systolic peak velocities were significantly (P < 0.05) increased in post-root repair BAV patients throughout the aorta (six of nine analysis planes) and to a lesser extent in TAV patients (three of nine analysis planes). BAV reimplantation resulted in significantly increased peak velocities in the proximal AAo compared with root repair with TAV (2.3 ± 0.6 vs 1.6 ± 0.4 m/s, P = 0.017). Post-surgical patients showed a non-significant trend towards higher systolic flow acceleration as a surrogate measure of reduced aortic compliance. CONCLUSIONS: VSARR restored a cohesive flow pattern independent of native valve morphology but resulted in increased peak velocities throughout the aorta. 4D flow MRI methods can assess the clinical implications of altered aortic flow dynamics in patients undergoing VSARR.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a more complete characterization of aortic blood flow in patients following valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) compared with presurgical cohorts matched by tricuspid and bicuspid valve morphology, age and presurgical aorta size. METHODS: Four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to analyse three-dimensional (3D) blood flow in the thoracic aorta of n = 13 patients after VSARR with reimplantation of native tricuspid aortic valve (TAV, n = 6) and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV, n = 7). Results were compared with presurgical age and aortic size-matched control cohorts with TAV (n = 10) and BAV (n = 10). Pre- and post-surgical aortic flow was evaluated using time-resolved 3D pathlines using a blinded grading system (0-2, 0 = small, 1 = moderate and 2 = prominent) analysing ascending aortic (AAo) helical flow. Systolic flow profile uniformity in the aortic root, proximal and mid-AAo was evaluated using a four-quadrant model. Further analysis in nine analysis planes distributed along the thoracic aorta quantified peak systolic velocity, retrograde fraction and peak systolic flow acceleration. RESULTS: Pronounced AAo helical flow in presurgical control subjects (both BAV and TAV: helix grading = 1.8 ± 0.4) was significantly reduced (0.2 ± 0.4, P < 0.001) in cohorts after VSARR independent of aortic valve morphology. Presurgical AAo flow was highly eccentric for BAV patients but more uniform for TAV. VSARR resulted in less eccentric flow profiles. Systolic peak velocities were significantly (P < 0.05) increased in post-root repair BAV patients throughout the aorta (six of nine analysis planes) and to a lesser extent in TAV patients (three of nine analysis planes). BAV reimplantation resulted in significantly increased peak velocities in the proximal AAo compared with root repair with TAV (2.3 ± 0.6 vs 1.6 ± 0.4 m/s, P = 0.017). Post-surgical patients showed a non-significant trend towards higher systolic flow acceleration as a surrogate measure of reduced aortic compliance. CONCLUSIONS: VSARR restored a cohesive flow pattern independent of native valve morphology but resulted in increased peak velocities throughout the aorta. 4D flow MRI methods can assess the clinical implications of altered aortic flow dynamics in patients undergoing VSARR.
Authors: John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Tino Ebbers; Lars Wigström; Jan Engvall; Christian L Olin; Ann F Bolger Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Michael Markl; Mary T Draney; D Craig Miller; Jonathan M Levin; Eric E Williamson; Norbert J Pelc; David H Liang; Robert J Herfkens Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: K L Yun; D C Miller; J I Fann; R S Mitchell; R C Robbins; K A Moore; P E Oyer; E B Stinson; N E Shumway; B A Reitz Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-11-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eric J Keller; S Chris Malaisrie; Jane Kruse; Patrick M McCarthy; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker; Jeremy D Collins Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2016-05-30
Authors: Susanne Schnell; Danielle A Smith; Alex J Barker; Pegah Entezari; Amir R Honarmand; Maria L Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Patrick M McCarthy; Jeremy Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jeremy D Collins; Edouard Semaan; Alex Barker; Patrick M McCarthy; James C Carr; Michael Markl; S Chris Malaisrie Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2015-07-23 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Nicola Galea; Filippo Piatti; Christopher Lau; Francesco Sturla; Luca Weltert; Iacopo Carbone; Ruggero De Paulis; Mario Gaudino; Leonard N Girardi Journal: J Vis Surg Date: 2018-05-09
Authors: Malenka M Bissell; Margaret Loudon; Aaron T Hess; Victoria Stoll; Elizabeth Orchard; Stefan Neubauer; Saul G Myerson Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Alexander Lenz; Johannes Petersen; Christoph Riedel; Julius M Weinrich; Hendrik Kooijman; Bjoern P Schoennagel; Gerhard Adam; Yskert von Kodolitsch; Hermann Reichenspurner; Evaldas Girdauskas; Peter Bannas Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Lucia Cocomello; Marco Meloni; Filippo Rapetto; Mai Baquedano; Maria Victoria Ordoñez; Giovanni Biglino; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Andrew Parry; Serban Stoica; Massimo Caputo Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 5.501