Literature DB >> 10571974

Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after different types of valve-preserving surgery.

R G Leyh1, C Schmidtke, H H Sievers, M H Yacoub.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The surgical approach to aortic root aneurysm and/or dissection remains controversial. The use of valve-sparing operations, which are thought to have many advantages, is increasing. We hypothesized that the particular technique and type of surgery could influence valve motion characteristics and function. Therefore, we studied the instantaneous opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after the main 2 types of valve-sparing surgery. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 20 patients (10 with tube replacement of the aortic root, group A; and 10 with separate replacement of the sinuses of Valsalva, group B) and 10 controls (group C), transthoracic and transesophageal studies on aortic valve dynamics were performed. Three distinct phases of aortic valve motion were identified. They were as follows: (1) a rapid opening, with a velocity of 20.9+/-4.2 cm/s in group C, 27.1+/-10.9 cm/s in group B (P=NS), and 58.3+/-18.4 cm/s in group A (group A versus group C, P<0. 001; group A versus group B, P=0.001); (2) a slow systolic closure, with 12.5+/-6.6% and 10.8+/-2.2% of maximal opening in groups C and B, respectively (P=NS), and 3.8+/-1.6% in group A (group A versus group C, P=0.001; group A versus group B, P<0.001); and (3) a rapid closing movement, with a velocity of 26.3+/-5.6 cm/s in group C, 32. 4+/-11.4 cm/s in group B (P=NS), and 21.8+/-3.5 cm/s in group A (group A versus group C, P=NS; group A versus group B, P=0.008). The pressure strain of the elastic modulus was different in groups C and B only at the commissures (682+/-145 g/cm(2) versus 1896+/-726 g/cm(2), respectively; P<0.001). At all root levels, the distensibility was reduced in group A (P<0.001). Systolic contact of aortic cusps and wall occurred only in group A.
CONCLUSIONS: Near-normal opening and closing characteristics can be achieved by a technique that preserves the shape and independent mobility of the sinuses of Valsalva.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10571974     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.21.2153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  37 in total

Review 1.  Annular management during aortic valve repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-11-25

Review 2.  Dilation of the thoracic aorta: medical and surgical management.

Authors:  P Nataf; E Lansac
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Haemodynamic outcome at four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging following valve-sparing aortic root replacement with tricuspid and bicuspid valve morphology.

Authors:  Edouard Semaan; Michael Markl; S Chris Malaisrie; Alex Barker; Bradley Allen; Patrick McCarthy; James C Carr; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Aortic valve sparing operations: outcomes at 20 years.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

5.  Anatomy of the aortic root: implications for valve-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Efstratios I Charitos; Hans-Hinrich Sievers
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

6.  Should the annulus be fixed in aortic valve-sparing root replacement with remodeling?

Authors:  Kojiro Furukawa; Keiji Kamohara; Junji Yunoki; Shugo Koga; Manabu Itoh; Hiroyuki Morokuma; Yosuke Mukae; Tsuyoshi Itoh; Shigeki Morita
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-22

Review 7.  Toward standardization of valve-sparing root replacement and annuloplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-09-17

8.  The impact of the aortic valve impairment on the distant coronary arteries hemodynamics: a fluid-structure interaction study.

Authors:  Hossein Mohammadi; Raymond Cartier; Rosaire Mongrain
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Mimicking isovolumic contraction with combined electromechanical stimulation improves the development of engineered cardiac constructs.

Authors:  Kathy Ye Morgan; Lauren Deems Black
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Aortic valve sparing operations: a review.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.