Literature DB >> 23489528

Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography.

Joon-Won Kang1, Hae Geun Song, Dong Hyun Yang, Seunghee Baek, Dae-Hee Kim, Jong-Min Song, Duk-Hyun Kang, Tae-Hwan Lim, Jae-Kwan Song.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to define the clinical importance of an integrated classification of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) phenotypes and aortopathy using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
BACKGROUND: An association between BAV phenotypes and the pattern of valvular dysfunction or bicuspid aortopathy has yet to be definitely established.
METHODS: The study cohort included 167 subjects (116 men, age 54.6 ± 14.4 years) who underwent both MDCT and transthoracic echocardiography from 2003 to 2010. Two BAV phenotypes-fusion of the right and left coronary cusps (BAV-AP) and fusion of the right or left coronary cusp and noncoronary cusp (BAV-RL)-were identified. Forty-five patients showed normal aortic dimensions and were classified as type 0. In the remaining patients, hierarchic cluster analysis showed 3 different types of bicuspid aortopathy according to the pattern of aortic dilation: type 1 (aortic enlargement confined to the sinus of Valsalva [n = 34]), type 2 (aortic enlargement involving the tubular portion of the ascending aorta [n = 49]), and type 3 (aortic enlargement extending to the transverse aortic arch [n = 39]).
RESULTS: The prevalence of BAV-AP and BAV-RL was 55.7% and 44.3%, respectively. Comparing BAV-AP and BAV-RL, no differences in age or in the prevalence of male sex were determined. However, significant differences in the valvular dysfunction pattern were noted, with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis predominating in patients with BAV-RL (66.2% vs. 46.2% in BAV-AP; p = 0.01), and moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation in BAV-AP (32.3% vs. 6.8% in BAV-RL; p < 0.0001). A normal aorta was the most common phenotype in BAV-AP patients (33.3% vs. 18.9% in BAV-RL; p = 0.037), and type 3 aortopathy was the most common phenotype in BAV-RL patients (40.5% vs. 9.7% in BAV-AP; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy differed significantly between the 2 BAV phenotypes, suggesting the possibility of etiologically different entities.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23489528     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  61 in total

1.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging-based characterization of aortic morphometry and haemodynamics: impact of age, aortic diameter, and valve morphology.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Alex J Barker; Ian Murphy; Kelly Jarvis; Susanne Schnell; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Michael Markl
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Aortic shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve with stenosis and insufficiency.

Authors:  Yan Shan; Jun Li; Yongshi Wang; Boting Wu; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Chunsheng Wang; Xiaolin Wang; Xianhong Shu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Haemodynamic outcome at four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging following valve-sparing aortic root replacement with tricuspid and bicuspid valve morphology.

Authors:  Edouard Semaan; Michael Markl; S Chris Malaisrie; Alex Barker; Bradley Allen; Patrick McCarthy; James C Carr; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 4.  Bicuspid aortic valve syndrome: a multidisciplinary approach for a complex entity.

Authors:  María Martín; Rebeca Lorca; José Rozado; Rubén Alvarez-Cabo; Juan Calvo; Isaac Pascual; Helena Cigarrán; Isabel Rodríguez; César Morís
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Aortic stenosis exacerbates flow aberrations related to the bicuspid aortic valve fusion pattern and the aortopathy phenotype.

Authors:  Yan Shan; Jun Li; Yongshi Wang; Boting Wu; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Chunsheng Wang; Xiaolin Wang; Xianhong Shu
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Characteristics of aortic valve dysfunction and ascending aorta dimensions according to bicuspid aortic valve morphology.

Authors:  Hong Ju Shin; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Kun Chee; Jun Suk Kim; Sung Min Ko
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Genetic diagnostics of inherited aortic diseases : Medical strategy analysis.

Authors:  Y von Kodolitsch; K Kutsche
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Valvular heart disease in congenital heart disease: a narrative review.

Authors:  Joshua M Saef; Joanna Ghobrial
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

9.  Bicuspid valve-related aortic disease: flow assessment with conventional phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Bicuspid aortic valve related aortopathy.

Authors:  Sina Stock; Salah A Mohamed; Hans-Hinrich Sievers
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.