Literature DB >> 33963389

Blood flow energy loss: a predictor for the recovery of left ventricular function after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.

Yu Hohri1, Keiichi Itatani1, Satoshi Numata1, Sachiko Yamazaki1, Shohei Miyazaki2, Teruyasu Nishino2, Hitoshi Yaku1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It is difficult to estimate the improvement in left ventricular (LV) function after aortic valve replacement (AVR). The present study aimed to evaluate whether energy loss (EL) can predict the postoperative LV function after AVR.
METHODS: Nine patients who underwent AVR with a bioprosthetic valve were enrolled in the present study. Porcine prostheses were used in 5 patients and bovine pericardial prostheses were used in 4 patients. The aortic flow pattern was visualized and EL and cardiac output (CO) were measured using 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging from the LV to the descending aorta; the EL/CO ratio in the extracted area was calculated as total EL/CO ratio.
RESULTS: With a porcine valve, a severe helical flow was observed in the ascending aorta during the holosystolic phase. In contrast, with a bovine pericardial valve, straight transvalvular aortic flow was observed in the early systolic phase and 2 large vortical flows occurred on both sides of the greater and lesser curvature of the ascending aorta after the mid-systolic period. The total EL/CO ratio was strongly correlated with LV ejection fraction improvement after AVR (r = 0.74, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The aortic flow pattern is different between the porcine valve and bovine pericardial valve. The total EL/CO ratio is a valuable tool for evaluating the postoperative LV ejection fraction improvement after AVR. Optimization of total EL/CO ratio would have potential to improve haemodynamic performances after AVR.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4-Dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging; Aortic valve replacement; Bioprosthetic prosthesis; Blood flow imaging; Energy loss

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33963389      PMCID: PMC8759471          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  19 in total

1.  Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management.

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Haemodynamic outcome at four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging following valve-sparing aortic root replacement with tricuspid and bicuspid valve morphology.

Authors:  Edouard Semaan; Michael Markl; S Chris Malaisrie; Alex Barker; Bradley Allen; Patrick McCarthy; James C Carr; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 3.  Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Stuart J Head; Mevlüt Çelik; A Pieter Kappetein
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators.

Authors:  H M Connolly; J K Oh; T A Orszulak; S L Osborn; V L Roger; D O Hodge; K R Bailey; J B Seward; A J Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-05-20       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  The Role of Imaging of Flow Patterns by 4D Flow MRI in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-02

6.  2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Volkmar Falk; Jeroen J Bax; Michele De Bonis; Christian Hamm; Per Johan Holm; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Emmanuel Lansac; Daniel Rodriguez Muñoz; Raphael Rosenhek; Johan Sjögren; Pilar Tornos Mas; Alec Vahanian; Thomas Walther; Olaf Wendler; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Evaluation of Cardiac Shunts With 4D Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Intra- and Interobserver Variability.

Authors:  Javier Urmeneta Ulloa; Ana Álvarez Vázquez; Vicente Martínez de Vega; José Ángel Cabrera
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Claudia Blais; Jean G Dumesnil; Richard Baillot; Serge Simard; Daniel Doyle; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-08-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Comparable long-term results for porcine and pericardial prostheses after isolated aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Martin Andreas; Stephanie Wallner; Kurt Ruetzler; Dominik Wiedemann; Marek Ehrlich; Georg Heinze; Thomas Binder; Anton Moritz; Michael J Hiesmayr; Alfred Kocher; Guenther Laufer
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.