Literature DB >> 24298060

The sister chromatid cohesion pathway suppresses multiple chromosome gain and chromosome amplification.

Shay Covo1, Christopher M Puccia, Juan Lucas Argueso, Dmitry A Gordenin, Michael A Resnick.   

Abstract

Gain or loss of chromosomes resulting in aneuploidy can be important factors in cancer and adaptive evolution. Although chromosome gain is a frequent event in eukaryotes, there is limited information on its genetic control. Here we measured the rates of chromosome gain in wild-type yeast and sister chromatid cohesion (SCC) compromised strains. SCC tethers the newly replicated chromatids until anaphase via the cohesin complex. Chromosome gain was measured by selecting and characterizing copper-resistant colonies that emerged due to increased copies of the metallothionein gene CUP1. Although all defective SCC diploid strains exhibited increased rates of chromosome gain, there were 15-fold differences between them. Of all mutants examined, a hypomorphic mutation at the cohesin complex caused the highest rate of chromosome gain while disruption of WPL1, an important regulator of SCC and chromosome condensation, resulted in the smallest increase in chromosome gain. In addition to defects in SCC, yeast cell type contributed significantly to chromosome gain, with the greatest rates observed for homozygous mating-type diploids, followed by heterozygous mating type, and smallest in haploids. In fact, wpl1-deficient haploids did not show any difference in chromosome gain rates compared to wild-type haploids. Genomic analysis of copper-resistant colonies revealed that the "driver" chromosome for which selection was applied could be amplified to over five copies per diploid cell. In addition, an increase in the expected driver chromosome was often accompanied by a gain of a small number of other chromosomes. We suggest that while chromosome gain due to SCC malfunction can have negative effects through gene imbalance, it could also facilitate opportunities for adaptive changes. In multicellular organisms, both factors could lead to somatic diseases including cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromosome gain; cohesin; genome instability; sister chromatid cohesion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24298060      PMCID: PMC3914611          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.159202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  80 in total

1.  Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair.

Authors:  Lena Ström; Hanna Betts Lindroos; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Camilla Sjögren
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain.

Authors:  Elçin Unal; Ayelet Arbel-Eden; Ulrike Sattler; Robert Shroff; Michael Lichten; James E Haber; Douglas Koshland
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  The enhancement of pericentromeric cohesin association by conserved kinetochore components promotes high-fidelity chromosome segregation and is sensitive to microtubule-based tension.

Authors:  Carrie A Eckert; Daniel J Gravdahl; Paul C Megee
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion at the S. cerevisiae replication fork.

Authors:  Armelle Lengronne; John McIntyre; Yuki Katou; Yutaka Kanoh; Karl-Peter Hopfner; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Frank Uhlmann
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Genome-wide genetic analysis of polyploidy in yeast.

Authors:  Zuzana Storchová; Amanda Breneman; Jessica Cande; Joshua Dunn; Kendra Burbank; Eileen O'Toole; David Pellman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The pattern of gene amplification is determined by the chromosomal location of hairpin-capped breaks.

Authors:  Vidhya Narayanan; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Hyun-Min Kim; Thomas D Petes; Kirill S Lobachev
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor.

Authors:  Beth A A Weaver; Alain D Silk; Cristina Montagna; Pascal Verdier-Pinard; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans.

Authors:  Anna Selmecki; Anja Forche; Judith Berman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Different mating-type-regulated genes affect the DNA repair defects of Saccharomyces RAD51, RAD52 and RAD55 mutants.

Authors:  Maria Valencia-Burton; Masaya Oki; Jean Johnson; Tracey A Seier; Rohinton Kamakaka; James E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Genomic convergence toward diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Aleeza C Gerstein; Hye-Jung E Chun; Alex Grant; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  20 in total

1.  Both R-loop removal and ribonucleotide excision repair activities of RNase H2 contribute substantially to chromosome stability.

Authors:  Deborah A Cornelio; Hailey N C Sedam; Jessica A Ferrarezi; Nadia M V Sampaio; Juan Lucas Argueso
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-02-20

Review 2.  Ploidy Variation in Fungi: Polyploidy, Aneuploidy, and Genome Evolution.

Authors:  Robert T Todd; Anja Forche; Anna Selmecki
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2017-07

Review 3.  Cohesin Mutations in Cancer.

Authors:  Magali De Koninck; Ana Losada
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Large-Scale Chromosomal Changes and Associated Fitness Consequences in Pathogenic Fungi.

Authors:  Anja Forche
Journal:  Curr Fungal Infect Rep       Date:  2014-06-01

5.  The regulation of chromosome segregation via centromere loops.

Authors:  Josh Lawrimore; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 6.  Genetic instability in budding and fission yeast-sources and mechanisms.

Authors:  Adrianna Skoneczna; Aneta Kaniak; Marek Skoneczny
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 7.  Shift and adapt: the costs and benefits of karyotype variations.

Authors:  Aleeza C Gerstein; Judith Berman
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 8.  Cohesin mutations in human cancer.

Authors:  Victoria K Hill; Jung-Sik Kim; Todd Waldman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-05-17

Review 9.  Emerging themes in cohesin cancer biology.

Authors:  Todd Waldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  The Opposing Actions of Arabidopsis CHROMOSOME TRANSMISSION FIDELITY7 and WINGS APART-LIKE1 and 2 Differ in Mitotic and Meiotic Cells.

Authors:  Kuntal De; Pablo Bolaños-Villegas; Sayantan Mitra; Xiaohui Yang; Garret Homan; Guang-Yuh Jauh; Christopher A Makaroff
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 11.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.