Literature DB >> 17242156

The enhancement of pericentromeric cohesin association by conserved kinetochore components promotes high-fidelity chromosome segregation and is sensitive to microtubule-based tension.

Carrie A Eckert1, Daniel J Gravdahl, Paul C Megee.   

Abstract

Sister chromatid cohesion, conferred by the evolutionarily conserved cohesin complex, is essential for proper chromosome segregation. Cohesin binds to discrete sites along chromosome arms, and is especially enriched surrounding centromeres, but past studies have not clearly defined the roles of arm and pericentromeric cohesion in chromosome segregation. To address this issue, we developed a technique that specifically reduced pericentromeric cohesin association on a single chromosome without affecting arm cohesin binding. Under these conditions, we observed more extensive stretching of centromeric chromatin and elevated frequencies of chromosome loss, suggesting that pericentromeric cohesin enrichment is essential for high-fidelity chromosome transmission. The magnitude of pericentromeric cohesin association was negatively correlated with tension between sister kinetochores, with the highest levels of association in cells lacking kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Pericentromeric cohesin recruitment required evolutionarily conserved components of the inner and central kinetochore. Together, these observations suggest that pericentromeric cohesin levels reflect the balance of opposing forces: the kinetochore-mediated enhancement of cohesin binding and the disruption of binding by mechanical tension at kinetochores. The involvement of conserved kinetochore components suggests that this pathway for pericentromeric cohesin enrichment may have been retained in higher eukaryotes to promote chromosome biorientation and accurate sister chromatid segregation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17242156      PMCID: PMC1785119          DOI: 10.1101/gad.1498707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  64 in total

Review 1.  Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Don W Cleveland; Yinghui Mao; Kevin F Sullivan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring.

Authors:  Stephan Gruber; Christian H Haering; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  The spindle checkpoint: tension versus attachment.

Authors:  Benjamin A Pinsky; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.808

4.  Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p.

Authors:  Iain M Cheeseman; Scott Anderson; Miri Jwa; Erin M Green; Jung seog Kang; John R Yates; Clarence S M Chan; David G Drubin; Georjana Barnes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Ted R Zarzar; E D Salmon; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  The highly conserved Ndc80 complex is required for kinetochore assembly, chromosome congression, and spindle checkpoint activity.

Authors:  Mark L McCleland; Richard D Gardner; Marko J Kallio; John R Daum; Gary J Gorbsky; Daniel J Burke; P Todd Stukenberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  An Mtw1 complex promotes kinetochore biorientation that is monitored by the Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase.

Authors:  Benjamin A Pinsky; Sean Y Tatsutani; Kimberly A Collins; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 8.  Neocentromeres: role in human disease, evolution, and centromere study.

Authors:  David J Amor; K H Andy Choo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-08-26       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Stu2p, the budding yeast member of the conserved Dis1/XMAP215 family of microtubule-associated proteins is a plus end-binding microtubule destabilizer.

Authors:  Mark van Breugel; David Drechsel; Anthony Hyman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore reveals a conserved molecular core.

Authors:  Stefan Westermann; Iain M Cheeseman; Scott Anderson; John R Yates; David G Drubin; Georjana Barnes
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  58 in total

1.  S-phase cyclin-dependent kinases promote sister chromatid cohesion in budding yeast.

Authors:  W-S Hsu; S L Erickson; H-J Tsai; C A Andrews; A C Vas; D J Clarke
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Pericentric chromatin is organized into an intramolecular loop in mitosis.

Authors:  Elaine Yeh; Julian Haase; Leocadia V Paliulis; Ajit Joglekar; Lisa Bond; David Bouck; E D Salmon; Kerry S Bloom
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  DNA topoisomerase II is a determinant of the tensile properties of yeast centromeric chromatin and the tension checkpoint.

Authors:  Tariq H Warsi; Michelle S Navarro; Jeff Bachant
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 4.  Bi-orienting chromosomes: acrobatics on the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  Heterochromatin and the cohesion of sister chromatids.

Authors:  Marc Gartenberg
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 6.  The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore.

Authors:  Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Kinetochore function and chromosome segregation rely on critical residues in histones H3 and H4 in budding yeast.

Authors:  Tessie M Ng; Tineke L Lenstra; Nicole Duggan; Shuangying Jiang; Steven Ceto; Frank C P Holstege; Junbiao Dai; Jef D Boeke; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Cell cycle-specific cleavage of Scc2 regulates its cohesin deposition activity.

Authors:  Julie Woodman; Tyler Fara; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Michael Trejo; Nancy Luong; Kirk C Hansen; Paul C Megee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Pericentromeric sister chromatid cohesion promotes kinetochore biorientation.

Authors:  Tessie M Ng; William G Waples; Brigitte D Lavoie; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 10.  Emerging roles for centromeres in meiosis I chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Gloria A Brar; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.