Literature DB >> 16782999

Different mating-type-regulated genes affect the DNA repair defects of Saccharomyces RAD51, RAD52 and RAD55 mutants.

Maria Valencia-Burton1, Masaya Oki, Jean Johnson, Tracey A Seier, Rohinton Kamakaka, James E Haber.   

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells expressing both a- and alpha-mating-type (MAT) genes (termed mating-type heterozygosity) exhibit higher rates of spontaneous recombination and greater radiation resistance than cells expressing only MATa or MATalpha. MAT heterozygosity suppresses recombination defects of four mutations involved in homologous recombination: complete deletions of RAD55 or RAD57, an ATPase-defective Rad51 mutation (rad51-K191R), and a C-terminal truncation of Rad52, rad52-Delta327. We investigated the genetic basis of MAT-dependent suppression of these mutants by deleting genes whose expression is controlled by the Mata1-Matalpha2 repressor and scoring resistance to both campothecin (CPT) and phleomycin. Haploid rad55Delta strains became more damage resistant after deleting genes required for nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), a process that is repressed in MATa/MATalpha cells. Surprisingly, NHEJ mutations do not suppress CPT sensitivity of rad51-K191R or rad52-Delta327. However, rad51-K191R is uniquely suppressed by deleting the RME1 gene encoding a repressor of meiosis or its coregulator SIN4; this effect is independent of the meiosis-specific homolog, Dmc1. Sensitivity of rad52-Delta327 to CPT was unexpectedly increased by the MATa/MATalpha-repressed gene YGL193C, emphasizing the complex ways in which MAT regulates homologous recombination. The rad52-Delta327 mutation is suppressed by deleting the prolyl isomerase Fpr3, which is not MAT regulated. rad55Delta is also suppressed by deletion of PST2 and/or YBR052C (RFS1, rad55 suppressor), two members of a three-gene family of flavodoxin-fold proteins that associate in a nonrandom fashion with chromatin. All three recombination-defective mutations are made more sensitive by deletions of Rad6 and of the histone deacetylases Rpd3 and Ume6, although these mutations are not themselves CPT or phleomycin sensitive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16782999      PMCID: PMC1569815          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.058685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.402


  65 in total

1.  Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast.

Authors:  J J Wyrick; F C Holstege; E G Jennings; H C Causton; D Shore; M Grunstein; E S Lander; R A Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair.

Authors:  J A Downs; N F Lowndes; S P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The yeast peptidyl proline isomerases FPR3 and FPR4, in high copy numbers, suppress defects resulting from the absence of the E3 ubiquitin ligase TOM1.

Authors:  M Davey; C Hannam; C Wong; C J Brandl
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  2000-04

4.  Yeast DNA ligase IV mediates non-homologous DNA end joining.

Authors:  T E Wilson; U Grawunder; M R Lieber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Activation of basal transcription by a mutation in SIN4, a yeast global repressor, occurs through a mechanism different from activator-mediated transcriptional enhancement.

Authors:  T Mizuno; S Harashima
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  2000-02

6.  The FK506 binding protein Fpr3 counteracts protein phosphatase 1 to maintain meiotic recombination checkpoint activity.

Authors:  Andreas Hochwagen; Wai-Hong Tham; Gloria A Brar; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  Induction of genome instability by DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kyungjae Myung; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2003-03-01

9.  Acetylation of histone H4 by Esa1 is required for DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Alexander W Bird; David Y Yu; Marilyn G Pray-Grant; Qifeng Qiu; Kirsty E Harmon; Paul C Megee; Patrick A Grant; M Mitchell Smith; Michael F Christman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The requirement for ATP hydrolysis by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 is bypassed by mating-type heterozygosity or RAD54 in high copy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Morgan; Naseem Shah; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  24 in total

1.  The Chromatin and Transcriptional Landscape of Native Saccharomyces cerevisiae Telomeres and Subtelomeric Domains.

Authors:  Aisha Ellahi; Deborah M Thurtle; Jasper Rine
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Shu complex is a conserved regulator of homologous recombination.

Authors:  Julieta Martino; Kara A Bernstein
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Clustered mutations in yeast and in human cancers can arise from damaged long single-strand DNA regions.

Authors:  Steven A Roberts; Joan Sterling; Cole Thompson; Shawn Harris; Deepak Mav; Ruchir Shah; Leszek J Klimczak; Gregory V Kryukov; Ewa Malc; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Michael A Resnick; Dmitry A Gordenin
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Exploring genetic suppression interactions on a global scale.

Authors:  Jolanda van Leeuwen; Carles Pons; Joseph C Mellor; Takafumi N Yamaguchi; Helena Friesen; John Koschwanez; Mojca Mattiazzi Ušaj; Maria Pechlaner; Mehmet Takar; Matej Ušaj; Benjamin VanderSluis; Kerry Andrusiak; Pritpal Bansal; Anastasia Baryshnikova; Claire E Boone; Jessica Cao; Atina Cote; Marinella Gebbia; Gene Horecka; Ira Horecka; Elena Kuzmin; Nicole Legro; Wendy Liang; Natascha van Lieshout; Margaret McNee; Bryan-Joseph San Luis; Fatemeh Shaeri; Ermira Shuteriqi; Song Sun; Lu Yang; Ji-Young Youn; Michael Yuen; Michael Costanzo; Anne-Claude Gingras; Patrick Aloy; Chris Oostenbrink; Andrew Murray; Todd R Graham; Chad L Myers; Brenda J Andrews; Frederick P Roth; Charles Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Mating-type genes and MAT switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  James E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Suppression of the double-strand-break-repair defect of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad57 mutant.

Authors:  Cindy W Fung; Amy M Mozlin; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The sister chromatid cohesion pathway suppresses multiple chromosome gain and chromosome amplification.

Authors:  Shay Covo; Christopher M Puccia; Juan Lucas Argueso; Dmitry A Gordenin; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Mating type influences chromosome loss and replicative senescence in telomerase-deficient budding yeast by Dnl4-dependent telomere fusion.

Authors:  Damon H Meyer; Adam M Bailis
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Chromosomal translocations caused by either pol32-dependent or pol32-independent triparental break-induced replication.

Authors:  José F Ruiz; Belén Gómez-González; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  In silico evidence for functional specialization after genome duplication in yeast.

Authors:  Ossi Turunen; Ralph Seelke; Jed Macosko
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.